Your typing of forum members

[sbbds]

The bolded isn't me talking about LMFAO, if that's what you think.


I've already said multiple times that she's had all her typing threads deleted, and deleted most of her posts to project a certain image. How can I provide evidence of something that's been deleted? How can you say they're nonexistent even though you were there, replying to me and her? Just because there's no screenshot? That's not bulletproof.

Really odd reasoning and an odd thing to get hung up on imo.

They are currently nonexistent. I was there, but do you really expect I or anyone to remember specific details of primarily your interactions with her and also to *rely* on memory alone? Are your opinions which are based on your impressions from memories of posts supposed to be *more* bulletproof? Lol.

She has nearly 200 posts as of now still, even though those type thread ones have been deleted, which you could pull from. She discusses type in at least some of them.

What’s odd to me is getting so hung up on impressions of people when there isn’t even existing evidence of those interactions, and thinking people are supposed to be convinced of your arguments regardless.

[SlytherinPower]

4D Fe demo from IEE is a bloody mess. They just come off as someone who wants to fuck with everyone and screw up the atmosphere to disrupt the good flow of external feelings. She came in asking for help but purposely resisted and shrugged off any guidelines given. She got indignant and threw a hissy fit by calling people “clowns” after she summoned everyone to type her. She was especially ungrateful and passive aggressive to the one person who offered her the most help but she didn’t like that he was also the one who challenged her the most and the more he pressed for more clarity, the more resistant she became. She only wanted people to type her something that she likes that has a badass reputation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually, on every other forum BUT this one I've had my type(s) that I consider for myself for months without ever changing them. I use this forum mainly for something to do because I'm bored, so I figure why not have some fun with a type me thread(s)? Also, I've been mainly into mbti/enneagram, & even though I've been typed in socionics on another forum, I figured people here should know their shit more on socionics & it doesn't always directly line up with someone's mbti from what I've heard, so I wanted to see if people here had the same or different impression. People take this as wishy washy or that I need opinions, but really it's just a hobby pastime for something to do. Also, I like to pick people's brains for fun. People saw that as Ti seeking, but I'm very good at logic when it comes to being analytical on anything I have an interest in & research & think a lot about. Regardless, it honestly don't matter what people type me here or what they think of me. I'm done with the typing threads, too. Plus, anyone on here that i care to have more convos with, I'm doing so in a more private setting & not for the whole forum to see.

[SlytherinPower]

What does that have to do with the typology community fetishizing Se.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I always thought the community preferred intuitives?

[sbbds]

I always thought the community preferred intuitives?

Yeah....

Except for within socionics, the typology community as a whole looks down on sensing and fetishizes intuition.

[SlytherinPower]

It’s in reference to anything Se Jung related in typology communities is fetishized to having a badass reputation. I’m not saying any type is badass nor that I think any type is badass.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought types were how you process information & interact with the world around you? Didn't know a certain type was "tough" or "weak" per se.

[Loaded Piss Gun]

I found him on social media. He has a Tyler the Creator consummate memelord troll energy and impenetrable wall of irony that I don't. I also dont think we look alike much outside of being white guys with medium length hair

Nah, you're too serious. You remind me of an EIE friend quite a lot.

[Thor Mkbr]

Nah, you're too serious. You remind me of an EIE friend quite a lot.

Serious until you catch me out in the streets, fool.

[Loaded Piss Gun]

Serious until you catch me out in the streets, fool.

We gonna fite irl, bitch. UWU

[LemurianLo]

Yeah....

Except for within socionics, the typology community as a whole looks down on sensing and fetishizes intuition.

Oh God, that reminds of years ago when I was involved in MBTI communities and all the INTJ masterrace circle jerking. Remember literal threads on why sensing types are wholly useless and why intuitives can do everything they can and more. So stupid, especially considering just how many of those intuitives bashing sensing types were in fact mistyped.

[xerxe]

Typology communities are full of narcissistic elitists who love to smell their own farts. Typology gives them the tools and the excuse to cherry-pick an image in a make believe world, and to use that to feel superior to others. Typology is useful if it helps you to think about your life and your relationships, but some people are obviously there to validate their self-image and anti-social behaviour.

[Uncle Ave]

khcs - ISTJ Gorky

[Sol]

@ShiningLunette

it's possibly your type is not EII as you suppose now

your art taste has victimish content
profile's title: "Magical girl (◠‿・)—☆" - esoterics is Ni region
among close to EII are EIE/IEI which fit that.

[ShiningLunette]

@ShiningLunette

it's possibly your type is not EII as you suppose now

your art taste has victimish content
profile's title: "Magical girl (◠‿・)—☆" - esoterics is Ni region
among close to EII are EIE/IEI which fit that.

its unusual to judge a person typing solely by their art or aesthetic preference since it isn't a good indicator because there isn't really a consistent pattern divided by what people like. Anyway i'm never usually certain with anything. But i 100% certain about Se polr so its either EII or LII for me.

[Sol]

@ShiningLunette
I'd want to see videos of all who claims to be my dual. To understand better the types, certainly.
Especially when those are women.

Among those who claimed that in recent times all appeared to have other types.

@ooo *sigh*

Even among those who I typed to EII was the same. It's a doom. Just no better explanation.

[ShiningLunette]

i'll have to feel safe enough to consider posting personal or private things. So i guess i'll see.

Also, are u implying ur the only expert enough to accurately judge? are u saying i or someone else will not be able accurately judge myself or type people but only you are able to?

[Kalinoche buenanoche]

Typology communities are full of narcissistic elitists who love to smell their own farts. Typology gives them the tools and the excuse to cherry-pick an image in a make believe world, and to use that to feel superior to others. Typology is useful if it helps you to think about your life and your relationships, but some people are obviously there to validate their self-image and anti-social behaviour.

Sure, and everything is/can be valuable. Self-reference is a beast.

[Aylen]

@ShiningLunette

it's possibly your type is not EII as you suppose now

your art taste has victimish content
profile's title: "Magical girl (◠‿・)—☆" - esoterics is Ni region
among close to EII are EIE/IEI which fit that.

You are always saying how EII are kind, gentle and never rude, then as if by "magic" a girl shows up who appears to be just that so you promptly retype her beta NF based on very little information.

[aster]

You are always saying how EII are kind, gentle and never rude, then as if by "magic" a girl shows up who appears to be just that so you promptly retype her beta NF based on very little information.

Maybe it’s a test lol

[Sol]

You are always saying how EII are kind, gentle and never rude

Nice to notice your interest to types, as you've removed your IEI from the profile.

People having leading Fi value and are able to be emotionally pleasant the most among types, so they communicate the most softly among types.
I never said that EII are never rude. No one is perfect and anyone may do anything. A type predisposes to some behavior and so that behavior happens _more often_ compared to differing types.
The difference of Fi type compared to Fe is the degree, how often and contexts where they are rude. There is a different common level of the trait for differing types. If base Fi type is annoyed much and by good reason - he may become rude, but to get the same from Fe is much easier. To understand more clearly such nuances in behavior of types helps an experience and types examples.

The more of not common and not expected by base theory in a behavior for a type - the lesser possibility that type is correct. To be rude for base Fi is similar as for base Ni to ignore own foreboding. As for base Te to ignore or have no interest to facts and objectivity. If the degree of so unusual behavior is significant, seen not rarely and without unusually strong external factors pushing to that - there is significant possibility of other type.

P.S. I see a tower in your profile. You may tell in pm what happens, in case you want.

[Aylen]

Nice to notice your interest to types, as you've removed your IEI from the profile.

People having leading Fi value and are able to be emotionally pleasant the most among types, so they communicate the most softly among types.
I never said that EII are never rude. No one is perfect and anyone may do anything. A type predisposes to some behavior and so that behavior happens _more often_ compared to differing types.
The difference of Fi type compared to Fe is the degree, how often and contexts where they are rude. There is a different common level of the trait for differing types. If base Fi type is annoyed much and by good reason - he may become rude, but to get the same from Fe is much easier. To understand more clearly such nuances in behavior of types helps an experience and types examples.

The more of not common and not expected by base theory in a behavior for a type - the lesser possibility that type is correct. To be rude for base Fi is similar as for base Ni to ignore own foreboding. As for base Te to ignore or have no interest to facts and objectivity. If the degree of so unusual behavior is significant, seen not rarely and without unusually strong external factors pushing to that - there is significant possibility of other type.

P.S. I see a tower in your profile. You may tell in pm what happens, in case you want.

lol

Don't worry sol I didn't retype myself or anything since I have never put IEI in my TIM. I did joke around and put SLE once which you scolded me for.

You have said that EII are "lesser rude" or similar.

[Megatrop]

Fi base are actually among the most rude people around ime

[Sol]

I have never put IEI in my TIM

My memory is not very clear about this. Remember your opinion as IEI and that related to types was there.

> You have said that EII are "lesser rude" or similar.

This one I said.
I even have a "scientific experiment". Among two girls which I typed to EII, annoyed a little and then retyped to EIE and ESI. EIE has started to insult me by "bad words" after ~3 monthes, while ESI after ~2 years. It's seen that base Fi are more polite in several times!

[Chakram]

I even have a "scientific experiment". Among two girls which I typed to EII, annoyed a little and then retyped to EIE and ESI. EIE has started to insult me by "bad words" after ~3 monthes, while ESI after ~2 years. It's seen that base Fi are more polite in several times!

This isn't an experiment, it's just you typing by your already established opinions. Confirmation bias is a real thing.

[Sol]

@justalitnerdxx
as the typing thread was censorshiped, opinions are placed here

Your nick contains the term "nerd" - you perceive yourself so. This term is usually applied to technically interested intellectuals - relates to T.

also
The problem of typers alike Gulenko by Internet is that they mostly use _words_. They know a few about you, but try to type by the limited behavior shown in the typing process - where it's not hard to control yourself.
While words are easily to be changed, to filter the objectivity to influence to be typed to some type. The ones who know Jung types theory and have an opinion about own type or wish to have some type may significantly distort own description related to types, intentionally and not.
If typers used nonverbal behavior as main data (as I prefer) - there would be lesser possibility to be misleaded by this way.

You have 2 types in your profile: EII and IEI from Gulenko. As for example, you was inclined to think your type as F before typed by Gulenko - you could significantly fool him.

When a random forum's noob has agreed with IEI with a useless comment, you've wrote a glad reply. You've commented other noobs also. When I've pointed on your more possible T type based on your videos - you have ignored. You may to have emotional motivation to think your type as F. Emotions and truth in a thinking - match not good. This could be among reasons why you doubted in your type for years, - as did not wanted to accept a truth due emotions, while there was enough time for this.
You've closed the thread soon without rational reasons - because of negative emotions from opinions that your type may be other than you want.

The main use of Socionics is IR theory. It can and should be used to understand own type and the typology. Mistakes in types with the usage of IR theory lead to problems. With the emotional approach to own typing you are predisposed to mistake.

[Uncle Ave]

Your nick contains the term "nerd" - you perceive yourself so. This term is usually applied to technically interested intellectuals - relates to T.

I think her name means " a lit(erature) nerd", not something that relates to the technical intellectual interests - not that this an argument anyways.

[Chin Diaper 007]

Yeah, actually down to her core she is über rational LSE stressed out of her unfortunate womanhood which disturbs her logical faculties in extremely drastic manner.

[justalitnerdxx]

@justalitnerdxx
as the typing thread was censorshiped, opinions are placed here

Your nick contains the term "nerd" - you perceive yourself so. This term is usually applied to technically interested intellectuals - relates to T.

also
The problem of typers alike Gulenko by Internet is that they mostly use _words_. They know a few about you, but try to type by the limited behavior shown in the typing process - where it's not hard to control yourself.
While words are easily to be changed, to filter the objectivity to influence to be typed to some type. The ones who know Jung types theory and have an opinion about own type or wish to have some type may significantly distort own description related to types, intentionally and not.
If typers used nonverbal behavior as main data (as I prefer) - there would be lesser possibility to be misleaded by this way.

You have 2 types in your profile: EII and IEI from Gulenko. As for example, you was inclined to think your type as F before typed by Gulenko - you could significantly fool him.

When a random forum's noob has agreed with IEI with a useless comment, you've wrote a glad reply. You've commented other noobs also. When I've pointed on your more possible T type based on your videos - you have ignored. You may to have emotional motivation to think your type as F. Emotions and truth in a thinking - match not good. This could be among reasons why you doubted in your type for years, - as did not wanted to accept a truth due emotions, while there was enough time for this.
You've closed the thread soon without rational reasons - because of negative emotions from opinions that your type may be other than you want.

The main use of Socionics is IR theory. It can and should be used to understand own type and the typology. Mistakes in types with the usage of IR theory lead to problems. With the emotional approach to own typing you are predisposed to mistake.

I closed the thread actually because I felt it was misplaced and misguided. I do appreciate all feedback on my typing - I am not censoring based on people giving me different opinions. I do appreciate your opinion as I appreciate others and I do apologise if I’ve given you any other impression. I believe you consider me LII now? I have to be candid and say that’s not a type I’ve considered. I have believed I’m an Ethical rather than a Logical type though that said, it is possible that you are right and I’ve been naive to not consider ever being a Logical type. I am sincere when I say I will be looking into this.

I have been struggling with typing for years. I am not the only one though so I don’t appreciate being made to feel stupid and wrong for not being confident in my own assessments and understandings.

This is all I’ll say respectfully now on the matter. I’m taking (yet another) step back. I do appreciate insights from yourself and others, but I don’t want to discuss further.

[Number 9 large]

Yeah you’re definitely not SLE. You can’t utilize Ti through a soggy paper bag. You were trying to pathetically throw a nasty Ne Fi jab at me about the tattoo comment implying that I got tattoos to fit my typing. You can’t fake cognition. You can claim you’re Se but there’s none coming from you. When you feel threatened you demand others back their points but you don’t back up yours and then make Ne implications that have no real bearing on the topic just to throw people off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Aramas]

Just doing some winter housecleaning....
@woofwoofl SEE
@mfckrz LIE
@Suspiria EIE
@kingslayer EIE (80%)
@timber LSI (uncertain, seems beta ST though) [New]

[kingslayer]

Just doing some winter housecleaning....
@woofwoofl SEE
@mfckrz LIE
@Suspiria EIE
@kingslayer EIE (80%)
@timber LSI (uncertain, seems beta ST though) [New]

EIE? Fe base? Interesting.. How come?

[Aramas]

EIE? Fe base? Interesting.. How come?

I've hung out with a few EIE dudes before and seen some online. You vibe way more like them than any SLE I've known.

Still 20% chance of being wrong. I'm not absolutely certain. But I feel like it fits better. Beta STs are more like @Northstar or CS Hyatt. You're a lot closer to Robert Anton Wilson in terms of how you come off to others. You're warm and gregarious more than intently sensory or logical.

[kingslayer]

I've hung out with a few EIE dudes before and seen some online. You vibe way more like them than any SLE I've known.

Still 20% chance of being wrong. I'm not absolutely certain. But I feel like it fits better. Beta STs are more like @Northstar.

I hear ya ... It's possible.

to quote SBBDS "You're the kind of SLE Gulenko would type SEE" so could be some fe boosted one

[Aramas]

I hear ya ... It's possible.

to quote SBBDS "You're the kind of SLE Gulenko would type SEE" so could be some fe boosted one

I think a lot of people misunderstand Se and Fe. Fe "feels" like it would be Se because Socionists associate Se with a sense of force. And they often feel force around EIEs, but it's an emotional force they feel, not sensory. Any Se they have is still noticeable. Strong Se isn't felt like that.

[kingslayer]

I think a lot of people misunderstand Se and Fe. Fe "feels" like it would be Se because Socionists associate Se with a sense of force. And they often feel force around EIEs, but it's an emotional force they feel, not sensory.

Actually eie was the first typing I ever gave myself when I found socioncis. However as I studied the system more I learned my ti and si are too good for it. In fact my biggest beef with the typing is si polr. I feel like I'm pretty in touch with si

Jon has me as ESE.. perhaps that could fit better? Both fe base

[Aramas]

Actually eie was the first typing I ever gave myself when I found socioncis. However as I studied the system more I learned my ti and si are too good for it. In fact my biggest beef with the typing is si polr. I feel like I'm pretty in touch with si

Jon has me as ESE.. perhaps that could fit better? Both fe base

I think EIE. ESE is more like @heptayooooo. Or however many O's are in his name lol.

The thing about polr is that you don't know how bad you are at it because you're that bad at it.

The introverted polrs are not as apparent anyway. They're less glaring errors and more really small mistakes or critical blunders.

Or if they do make some kind of social faux pas it's something like not noticing the discomfort of other people.

[kingslayer]

I think EIE. ESE is more like @heptayooooo. Or however many O's are in his name lol.

The thing about polr is that you don't know how bad you are at it because you're that bad at it.

The introverted polrs are not as apparent anyway. They're less glaring errors and more really small mistakes or critical blunders.

Or if they do make some kind of social faux pas it's something like not noticing the discomfort of other people.

Yeah that's not me. I'm really quick at seeing how I make others feel..



Types that value Si prefer to spend their time doing enjoyable activities rather than straining themselves to achieve goals. They like to believe that if activities are done with enjoyment, people will give them more effort and time, and also becoming more skilled at what they are doing in the long run. They believe that goals should suit people's intrinsic needs rather than shaped by the demands and constraints of the external world, and so do not try to force others into doing things they don't want to do. They also try to be easygoing and pleasant, preferring peaceful coexistence to conflict, except when their personal well-being or comfort is directly at stake.

Also this makes Si sound like it's in my ego block, or at least valued. Maybe I'm ILE. Looks similar to EIE. NE base have the most trouble typing themselves from w hat I read. They can consider all sorts of types and shit and see themselves that way.

[Aramas]

Actually eie was the first typing I ever gave myself when I found socioncis. However as I studied the system more I learned my ti and si are too good for it. In fact my biggest beef with the typing is si polr. I feel like I'm pretty in touch with si

Jon has me as ESE.. perhaps that could fit better? Both fe base

Yeah that's not me. I'm really quick at seeing how I make others feel..



Types that value Si prefer to spend their time doing enjoyable activities rather than straining themselves to achieve goals. They like to believe that if activities are done with enjoyment, people will give them more effort and time, and also becoming more skilled at what they are doing in the long run. They believe that goals should suit people's intrinsic needs rather than shaped by the demands and constraints of the external world, and so do not try to force others into doing things they don't want to do. They also try to be easygoing and pleasant, preferring peaceful coexistence to conflict, except when their personal well-being or comfort is directly at stake.

Also this makes Si sound like it's in my ego block, or at least valued. Maybe I'm ILE. Looks similar to EIE. NE base have the most trouble typing themselves from w hat I read. They can consider all sorts of types and shit and see themselves that way.

Maybe emotionally but I don't know about sensory comfort. I remember you showing me a picture of you standing with your coworkers, and you had that mack daddy vibe going while there was at least one person in the photo who didn't seem all that comfy lol. But you didn't really notice or take that into account. Fe is not so much about noticing others feelings as affecting the feelings of others anyway. Fe is Fi ignoring.

[kingslayer]

Maybe emotionally but I don't know about sensory comfort. I remember you showing me a picture of you standing with your coworkers, and you had that mack daddy vibe going while there was at least one person in the photo who didn't seem all that comfy lol. But you didn't really notice or take that into account. Fe is not so much about noticing others feelings as affecting the feelings of others anyway. Fe is Fi ignoring.

Ahh.. I know the pic you mean. Actually I did notice. I purposely hovered my arm cause I saw he was already uncomfortable and I wanted to make him more so for the lolz. He was uncomfortable because he hates taking pics not because of me. I just upped his discomfort to amuse the other guy in the pic and myself cause he's always such an asshole it was funny to see him vulnerable from things as simple as picture taking and close physical contact.

So yeah.. Seems too good for Polr.. I'm always fixing my friends postures and my own as well, or telling people I live with to go sit in another chair for work because it's bad for their back the one they're using for so many hours.

The 3rd guy in that pic is actually EIE

[Aramas]

Ahh.. I know the pic you mean. Actually I did notice. I purposely hovered my arm cause I saw he was already uncomfortable and I wanted to make him more so for the lolz. He was uncomfortable because he hates taking pics not because of me. I just upped his discomfort to amuse the other guy in the pic and myself cause he's always such an asshole it was funny to see him vulnerable from things as simple as picture taking and close physical contact.

So yeah.. Seems too good for Polr.. I'm always fixing my friends postures and my own as well, or telling people I live with to go sit in another chair for work because it's bad for their back the one they're using for so many hours.

The 3rd guy in that pic is actually EIE

Upped his discomfort to amuse someone? That doesn't sound EIE to you?

[kingslayer]

Upped his discomfort to amuse someone? That doesn't sound EIE to you?

Well I noticed his si and influenced it. Lol

You said si polr doesn't notice even