What are your Socionics skills?
Updated poll. Please vote!
Model A
Aspects (static/dynamic etc.)
Reinin dichotomies
Model B (plus/minus)
Model G
Communication styles
Romance styles
Cognitive styles
Energy model
2 subtype system
DCNH subtypes
Small groups
Jung (Psychological types, the book)
I read Russian
Advanced VI
Typing from palm of hand
Other, what?
What are your Socionics skills?
Updated poll. Please vote!
Last edited by Tallmo; 02-28-2018 at 10:09 AM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Socionics theory is limited by model A and Jung. The other is wannabe-Socionics.
Aspects are 8 functions. Static/dynamic are Reinin's traits.
> Typing from palm of hand
only by other body parts
> Advanced VI
you've forgotten to mention also: super supreme advanced extended expanded ultra VI
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Menton pregle su expetted ir ademble co whipesham. Qu berager lo marved menton. Insions tra fathroserty resurious. Surric e trantic tra poincephedle firist.
Wikisocion
Socionics Links
Enneagram Links
A Socionics Test
Other Socionics Tests
Socionics Test Rating Project
Socionics types and Music Preference
Personality Traits of American Cities / Counties
Interesting Psychology Articles
Personality Traits Correlations
A Biased Reading List
Google Scholar Alerts
Type movie suggestions
Random Pictures Thread
Interesting Articles Thread
Best Countries To Emigrate To, Possibly
Voted for palm typing skill, my new favorite method to show off. Palm enthusiasts, where you at? I love it. Socionics just got super sexy
![]()
I voted but my actual skills are a bit rusty. Sweet idea @Tallmo![]()
"Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"
They asked the fox, "Who's your witness?" The fox said, "My tail!"
"Advanced VI"
lol
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
advanced VI in application![]()
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...s-and-Raccoons
@Tallmo it's seems like only "I read russian" is missing haha. The ones who know russian probably left and didn't think of coming back because they reached that next level.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I don't know anyone in the community who has become fluent in Russian and then applied it to socionics, aside from Rick and the native-speakers like Lytov, Olga, etc.
I've considered trying it but I've only seen a very small amount of current Russian material that has informed my view of socionics at all -- a few ideas from Model G in particular. I like SSS and Churumov for their ambition but have had more difficulty finding a meaningful way to incorporate their ideas.
Machine translation is getting better and better and the most insightful Russian stuff was written 20-35 years ago and already partly translated by Rick. I honestly think they could learn more from us than vice versa.
Last edited by Exodus; 03-03-2018 at 03:12 AM.
The purist. It is funny because it is like there exists extra layer on top of original stuff.![]()
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
Stress types aint there and learning russian so fun![]()
Great thread start!
allyourvillagearenowbelongtome
other: I'm not good at socionics
Phobic So/Sp 6w7 3w2 9w1
Bit of a comic books nerd, bit of a fashion nerd, a lot of a generalized nerd
Phrenology & physiognomy
Palm of hand and wrinkle tracking, like all the good typers do.
EIE | Creative | 4w3 sx/so
"хотите —
буду безукоризненно нежный,
не мужчина, а — облако в штанах!"
Except also Russian books on energy meridians
I clicked Model A and DCNH
- Model A I know the basics
- Aspects (static/dynamic etc.) I should have written "IE dichotomies". Anyway, this is very interesting. I sometimes use static/dynamic to type people, and maybe object/field (intro-/extrovert), but not external/internal, it would be fun to learn that too (or maybe I do but am not aware of it)
- Reinin dichotomies Not really, I understand it is Socionics-turned-upside-down, but I haven't really looked into it.
- Model B (plus/minus) I still don't get it.
- Model G No
- Communication styles I can relate to them
- Romance styles I can relate to them
- Cognitive styles I can relate to "dialectical-algorithmic", and it sounds cool too
- Energy model Is this the future of Socionics?
- 2 subtype system Never understood it
- DCNH subtypes Yes, all the time
- Small groups Would be interesting. I've understood they have expanded it a lot way beyond quadra and clubs. One can construct all kinds of small groups.
- Jung (Psychological types, the book) Should definitely be read. Much easier to understand with Socionics in mind.
- I read Russian No
- Advanced VI Not really. I can sometimes type people really fast though
- Typing from palm of hand Would be a nice trick in a bar, breaking the ice
- Other, what? Can't think of anything, Ne problems
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I realized recently that my first inclinations in meeting people is to look for commonalities and I seem to do this even when I'm trying to type people so usually start by assuming they're in or neighbouring quadra. I think it has showed poor results, so maybe i'll now start by first checking off the opposing/ other quadras as a measure of safety lol. Only partially related to the OP.
"Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"
They asked the fox, "Who's your witness?" The fox said, "My tail!"
how does one type by romance styles?slide into DMs and try romancing them?
*** BUMP ***
Please do the poll if you haven't already
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)