alright well thanks for telling me about your projections based on your expectations of your dual were they doing what I'm doingOriginally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
Haha, OK. Translation of this is: I (Bertrand) like the drama of battletypings because it feeds mymobilzing, otherwise when it's serious and my feelings might get hurt, I don't want to play. It's cool I (me) thought that, I (me) just thought i'd ask
Well why don't we run through the people you've spent threads and threads and topic over topics harassing over their type and the types of people they know?
Or no I won't because I won't feed your troll drama loving tendencies by re-mentioning people.
he's good at trolling and makes people make a fool out of themselves, which is amusing
yes, lets have an ethical sorting
if you're talking about aster, based on that stalker post, I'm guessing she doesn't mind the "harassment" [1] except in some kind of empty declarative sense
[1] "aha! so you admit to harassing!" no, no I don't, but I'm just pointing out the absurdity of your inability to let go of something that was never there to begin with
I don't know if he's good at it, but he does do it a lot.
To me he strains too much, I think he's over-reaching himself and his intellect without realizing it (it's been noticed by others also, that, at least comparatively on here, he's not that smart.)and makes people make a fool out of themselves, which is amusing
I do think it's funny when he 'trolls' Aylen for instance, because, he always comes out the worst.
Still, it's not everyone's cup of tea. being trolled, or 'trolled', as he tries. I'd prefer him to put his money where his mouth is, put his name in the spreadsheet to be typed, and even put his own typings on, but, it is what it is.
Thank you for your explanation.
It's more like to me you admit being a disgusting human being.
i dont think he comes out the worst
the funny part is that she still gets insanely angry about him typing her as ESFJ, every time haha
I don't think she cares. I think she cares about people being abused though (which is what he does, which you call 'trolling' and 'lol), but who knows, I guess she'd have to be asked, it's just my impression of that situation.
@Aylen?
Out of curiosity.
there's like zero hard feelings between me and Aylen anyway, only 3rd parties seem to care all that much
how does he abuse people?
He should PARTICIPATE on the sheet.lol. Betrand doesn't bother me that much. He just trolls sometimes. We don't have to keep digging up the past.
So many threads turn into this discussion.
Why dont we talk about how more people should PARTICIPATE on the typing spread sheet, and I don't mean the trolls
Anyway, anyone who's OK with Bertrand, isn't OK with me.
End of discussion for me on this thread
*Loud noises*
Wrong. You are clueless.
You are right.
The idea I got "insanely angry" over that is the silliest thing I heard someone say about me today. I am not 12. I had some fun poking at Bert tbh and made my point in the process. Maybe he felt that he did as well. I never asked. The same goes for K4M (I was told people thought I was angry with him too. I am not.). I don't even waste an ounce of energy disliking either of them. They have 0 impact on how I live my life. They can do or say what they want and so will I. If someone can't take the feedback or backlash for what they say then they should think twice before they say it. I am aware that I could get any number of responses to something I say so I often choose my words wisely and already know how I will respond to any feedback or backlash before I make the post. My self and other awareness is on point.
I am hardly on the forum lately but thanks for the mention so I could clear this up.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Who wants coffee?
how to exterminate rats
Last edited by Spermatozoa; 03-03-2018 at 01:52 AM.
"sometimes"?
I agree with you - why promote reason to a man whose mind is inherently chaotic and disinterested in closure? After all, trolls are dismissive of rules, laws, and objective standards as an ideal even to strive for. Sometimes their only motive is to "have fun", and they often cause harm out of curiosity. They like to discover what's possible and lack empathy for those who they invariably hurt. Most people can't fathom that a villain might lack a specific goal, and that he might be more goofy and zany than thuggish. Maybe the bad guy isn't actually the one who looks and sounds scary after all. Maybe the real bad guy just enjoys provoking fights because the excitement stimulates his or her mind, and it's the "creepy" guy who usually has to clean up his mess.
When you encounter a truly random character, do not even try to argue and defend yourself. Just attack, and go for the jugular whenever you have a chance - and believe me, you will get many opportunities to deal a blow, as this type of provocateur usually lacks foresight. They often overplay their hand too soon and will depend on their ability to improvise their way out of trouble. However, an individual strong in Ni will predict and be well placed to capitalise on this weakness when the time is right.
@Director Abbie if I'm not mistaken someone has added crazedrat's real name to the sheet.
I added what I remembered to have been his username at one point.
But the greatest tension is attained when the "PEDANTS" accuse the "Moralists" of violating some ethical requirements. "MORALISTS" (and especially ethics) at the same time feel as if they are forced to worship the "fetish" - a stupid impression made from the most miserable and most primitive version, remotely resembling their EGO program - the area of their innate professionalism, according to which each of them feels like a congenital "lawmaker", an "expert", a "judge", but certainly not a servant performer of the most crude and primitive of her designs.
trololololololololo
Always a pleasureThanks & thanks for helping me pick 2w1
The only thing Imma cut is the guy who does this and isn't even sneaky about it
Last edited by Chae; 03-03-2018 at 11:32 AM.
Individual field/cell protection also works^
lol ooo's entries just made my night
They are very Fe while being Se valuing quadra and Te PoLR, IEI.
pff the funny thing about this is that i was trying to be serious
@sirac
Schermata 2018-03-04 alle 08.11.53.png
yes? so sweet of u
Super ego relations are among the worst (from descriptions, and self experience) when they get closer, but, usually I have good feelings for the IEIs on here.pff the funny thing about this is that i was trying to be serious
@sirac
Schermata 2018-03-04 alle 08.11.53.png
yes? so sweet of u
I meant to ask you. There was a poster on here who appeared here briefly, they sounded exactly like you, and they were asking why their high emotionalism was Fe and not Fi. Then they disappeared. Anyway I thought they might be you, testing out to see if you were Fe or Fi. If I remember who they were, i'll link it, they were just like you.
Anyway, I know you weren't trying to be serious
If you want to know (if it matters), I don't dislike you and I think you're OK
BTW I heard on the rumor mill that you do have a dislike for Bertrand, and have said as much in several posts. From what i've gathered, you do have a dislike for Aylen. Complicated politics
Anyway your post was good because it showed who likes Bertrand (trolls vs non trolls), so thanks.
Oh, I think you're OK too in my book.
It's like this today haha
i wasn't even alive yet but i got chills. genius ad campaign. also, i miss the 70s. lol.
those don't do it for me. i have a love of 70s staged "heartfelt" musical numbers.
@at sirac son of sirac @bgdjf
All cozy in the 70s? Good, let me ruin it for you. This thing exists:
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I hate you.
Wow, the new X Files episode surely looks dope.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I was really trying to be serious lolol my plan was to type all the list, I actually have been thinking about making a list of all the people on here for a while, I have a paper on my notes with all the people of the forum I've typed, but then, on there, I felt compelled to follow the column, and in the end I felt ashamed not to know most people in there lol so I gave up before even starting.. let's say so.Super ego relations are among the worst (from descriptions, and self experience) when they get closer, but, usually I have good feelings for the IEIs on here.
I meant to ask you. There was a poster on here who appeared here briefly, they sounded exactly like you, and they were asking why their high emotionalism was Fe and not Fi. Then they disappeared. Anyway I thought they might be you, testing out to see if you were Fe or Fi. If I remember who they were, i'll link it, they were just like you.
Anyway, I know you weren't trying to be serious
If you want to know (if it matters), I don't dislike you and I think you're OK
I had no other nicknames aha
and yeah ok, sure, wtv you say sirac, as if I havent seen you type IEIs as EII just because you liked them, and ur passive-aggressive way to turn people u dont like into other quadras.. I mean, don't play it nice just because I called u out on the dynamic of super-egos, the things u say to other people about how u feel about them, underestimating a specific group, can be offending if then u put "me" or anyone else in the group u showed to underestimate, js
well, this pattern is common on this forum, not blaming u to follow the crowd
I don't like everyone who I type as Delta. Some people I like I type as other quadra. It's all good.
Edit: Now that I think about it, i'm struggling to think about any Deltas I don't like. Hmmm. There's some I may not have much in common with, or to talk about with, but, I don't think there's a 'dislike'. Hmm i'll maybe think about that one. Interesting. Thanks for mentioning it.
People say a lot of things, I am just being honest, but, as you mention it, that sort of thing is Fi valuing.
I know an IEE male at work, we don't socialize much, but we get on quite well. He tries to be pleasant with everyone, but in times alone we share our opinions and likes and dislikes about people, quite Fi judging I suppose it would seem. Anyway it's not the best, it just sort of happens. But, like him, I try to be pleasant with all people, but Fi is as Fi does at times.
With ESE I work with we talk about what people do. With IEE it's how we feel. There's some crossovers, and some differences. Subtle, but existing.
Cool
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 03-04-2018 at 06:51 PM.
I thought Bert makes you angry. Never understood why you paid so much efforts to fight with him. His messages were a little senseless.
> I am hardly on the forum lately but thanks for the mention so I could clear this up.
it's nice when IRL distracts you from local assylum
I don't know anyone who doesn't do this in some extent. Telling people how we feel about them is an essential part in establishing relationships..... ugh.
If I say, "they're all a bunch of mamabangers I hate them all, but hey, u not so bad among them all, I do fine with u! <3 <3!" this can be Fi in your twisted idea of what socionics gotta be like, but it's just plainly rude if u say it infront of everyone for everyone to see... Fi? think again.
ps, I'm sure your IEE friend doesn't share such opinions in front of all, as well
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
