Thread deleted sorry, ooops. May post laterThanks
What is your IQ?
Thread deleted sorry, ooops. May post later
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 02-22-2018 at 12:47 PM.
Probably pretty high.
Average but over 100. Maybe 110-120.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Somewhere between - ∞ and ∞.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
so your IQ is enough to assume the existence of negative IQ numbersOriginally Posted by Troll Nr 007
Yes, it is a normal distribution which means that it's tails will never cross the x-axis and therefore it is normed in a way that integration limits go from - ∞ to ∞.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Normal_distribution
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
IQ is calculated as non-negative number only. You usage of the statistical model is wrong here, what I've pointed above.
another one. N types are such N types...
> If you get that joke, your IQ is probably well above average.
but his T seems to be so so, anyway
P.S. my IQ was 110-115 by Amthauer test
Setting average IQ as 100 is illogical itself. I think IQ should only give percentile. That 100 is there for traditional reasons.
I don't get how one contradiction sets you off but you are able to look past other contradictions (set by your position) when you settle your mind. I don't get it. Sorry, but you are such an F.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Really? I guess your problem is that you don't understand the meaning of 10 to the power of negative Graham's number.
I'll explain it to you if you want.
I would like to see an IQ test without NT bias
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think or I have heard that actual cognitive tests measure things such as repetition of movements.
I can say that I'm visually quite restricted. I had to record my physics experiments on video in order to determine results but I have serious visual problems which are not related to visual acuity. I think those tests won't be fair. It is insanely easy to make me very dizzy in my head with right tricks.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
My IQ range is called:
Now it makes sense, I remember the reflective glasses joke
Must be small when you can't even get the sentence right.
I don't think that IQ test are biased at all. IQ measures your fluid reasoning, crystallized intelligence, and your working memory. I happen to think that its the other way around, NT's are more predisposed to developing these skills at younger age, while other types develop different types of skills, such as socializing. Its not only NT's though, there are plenty of ENFp, INFj, ISTj, and ISTp that have high IQ's so its not only type specific.
12 give or take a few points :3c
Just an enormous as my penis
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I see, I see...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
So, a normal distribution... Well, not that "normal"...I see, I see...
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
I would like to meet a stupid LII "mastermind". I am sure they exist because iq varies within the same type.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
They exist, you'll never know it because of how intellectual they are in their centers of interest though.
I remember an mbti meme involving a picture of 3 men: two bulked up guys with bodybuilder physiques and one scrawny guy with very little muscle standing between the other two. The caption read: "when you're an INTP with average IQ"
I guess my IQ is not high enough for this joke. So the other guys are also INTP but with higher IQ?. But they are all 3 INTP? Or is the skinny guy INTP and the other 2 some sensors. Ok, I get it, they are all 3 INTP and the thing about muscle is a metaphor for intelligence. Or something..?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Yes, I think the meme was supposed to be playing on the idea or the stereotype of those types having high IQs and it might act as a metaphor or analogy for how one with an average IQ might feel in the presence of those with higher IQs. Muscles being analogous to intelligence, in the case of this meme.
Don't sell yourself short. IQ is an overrated metric.
Last edited by perpetuus; 02-23-2018 at 07:48 PM.
Well, ability to see qualities that generate parallel paths might lead you to wrong paths...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Mastuh mind iq computing events unimaginable for all yall little garbage people
I never took a real IQ test so no clue. Plenty of fake IQ tests online though to falsely boost your ego.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
It's important what variant of the test you used.I'm 103. I shouldn't underestimate you then.
Also in IQ testing the difference up to 10 units is often thought as not meaningful due to inaccuracy of tests and not perfect conditions (you may be tired, etc). For example, making the same test after a year you may get this difference. Up to 120 IQ is same "normal" category. Not in general IQ, but in particular scales you may to have more significant difference - like being T type to do better math tasks than average F type.
Probably in the 99th percentile (I tried Raven's SPM once). By the way, IQ is just meaningless.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
There might be people with negative IQ numbers with a probability of 10 to the power of negative Graham's number.
If you get that joke, your IQ is probably well above average.
My IQ is -273,15
Negative IQ is interesting
Would it mean that you make other people more stupid? Being an IQ sink.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
All you have to do is to set the average IQ level to zero, and then all people with lower IQ has negative values as result.
It's a matter of definition of the reference number. The number 100 can be considered as an offset value.
btw. I never participated at an official IQ test, but I took an unofficial one and achieved 138 as result.
Last edited by WinnieW; 02-23-2018 at 09:14 PM.
If we define zero IQ as having no intelligence at all. Literally dumb as a rock. What would then negative IQ mean?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
If you define zero IQ = no IQ at all then negative values are meaningless, but thats a different definition.
It's much like the definition of a temperature scale. Set 0 and 100 as numbers for observable temperatures that make sense to people in reality,
e.g. freezing point and boiling point of water, then you get the Celcius temperature scale.
Yes, it's a number used by a mathematician named Graham. It's a sooooo unbelieable huge number, it blows every imagination.
10 to the power of negative Graham's number is a number soo unimaginable tiny... it's not zero, but in reality it can be regarded as zero.
Classical NT style of humor...
Destruction of the intelligence of other's.
Maybe Feelers have negative IQ.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I'm a genius, i promise!! I'm just a late bloomer... Heh, heh...
It 'overclocks' and you become a genius
After following a link, posted to a server today, I ended up on this article.
If the IQ test forced upon you was under 130, like mine, or you only have a rough estimate from the average of your online tests you can now take heart in these findings. You may be smarter than you, or others, think.
20 Scientifically-Proven Signs You're Smarter Than AverageYou use recreational drugs
Psychology Today
According to Psychology Today, people who use more drugs are more intelligent. "Intelligent people don't always do the right thing," they write, "only the evolutionarily novel thing."
According to a study conducted by National Child Development, "more intelligent children in the United Kingdom are more likely to grow up to consume psychoactive drugs than less intelligent children." These drugs include marijuana, cocaine, heroin, alcohol and tobacco.
The chart on the left shows the findings of the study. It depicts the latent factor for the consumption of 13 different kinds of psychoactive drugs, (cannabis, ecstasy, amphetamines, LSD, amyl nitrate, magic mushrooms, cocaine, temazepan, semeron, ketamine, crack, heroin, and methadone). There is a clear association between childhood general intelligence and adult drug consumption.
"Very bright individuals (with IQs above 125) are roughly three-tenths of a standard deviation more likely to consume psychoactive drugs than very dull individuals," says Psychology Today. They ran the same study in the U.S. and found similar results.
14/20 Not too bad. I don't want my brain volume measured just yet. I will look to dna and my MRI scan for a rough estimate.
Please remember that although some have high IQ they may still be LQ in other areas. Yep I totally stole than from a former forum member.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
anti-IQ, like anti-matter.
Posting Permissions
