Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 81

Thread: What is your IQ?

  1. #41
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Cognitive disorganization
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 ELFV?
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Your problem is that you don't take into account how IQ is calculated and that you can't understand it with the 1st time when I've said this above.
    So tell me how it is calculated every single time even when tests fail to take into account such a dismal/high number and we have to invent a new test for it as it takes a very weird test that handles the tail portion of it which are symmetrical in both ends.

    I think it takes a person with lots of IQ.

    In fact there are people who design IQ tests for absolute geniuses (who are not one). It gets very difficult to get test subjects even if they accomplish the task and since it is so hard it due to limited number of people it also means that could give false results. One way to get grasp of this is to make a simulation. Let's say you make a computer program that "throws" few dices few billion times. Well, the result distribution won't be "perfect" although it is very very near. I have made one. It was quite fun.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  2. #42

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,594
    Mentioned
    869 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas View Post
    I'm 103. I shouldn't underestimate you then.
    It's important what variant of the test you used.
    Also in IQ testing the difference up to 10 units is often thought as not meaningful due to inaccuracy of tests and not perfect conditions (you may be tired, etc). For example, making the same test after a year you may get this difference. Up to 120 IQ is same "normal" category. Not in general IQ, but in particular scales you may to have more significant difference - like being T type to do better math tasks than average F type.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #43
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Cognitive disorganization
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 ELFV?
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Te thing IQ measures is very artificial. If you do let's say height distribution then you need to put notion that (human) length > 0. As IQ is just some sort of random convention it can capture all the real numbers.

    There are other kinds of distributions like log normal distribution where left side of tail will end at 0 (and the curve is not symmetric around it's peak). Is IQ is truly normally distributed? Well, apparently, I'd say that statistical tools do not capture mechanism and are therefore just tools for approximation. Statement about IQ artificiality applies. It is just measures something where so called experts tend to agree with each other.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  4. #44
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    1,235
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    138 give or take 5
    I feel like this has already been a thread for some reason.

  5. #45
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,304
    Mentioned
    195 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    hurdur im smart hurdur

  6. #46
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    4,715
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    What's up with all the IQ threads? They are springing everywhere like mushrooms after a warm summer.

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    New York City
    TIM
    ILI-Ni, 5w6 sp/so
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I volunteered on a reaserch study for my friend, so these were my results

    Ravens Advanced Progressive Matricies- 33/36 (Grade 1)
    WAIS-lV: 141 IQ, my fluid and crystallized reasoning were very high, while my working memory was slightly above average.

  8. #48

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    New York City
    TIM
    ILI-Ni, 5w6 sp/so
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    I would like to see an IQ test without NT bias
    I don't think that IQ test are biased at all. IQ measures your fluid reasoning, crystallized intelligence, and your working memory. I happen to think that its the other way around, NT's are more predisposed to developing these skills at younger age, while other types develop different types of skills, such as socializing. Its not only NT's though, there are plenty of ENFp, INFj, ISTj, and ISTp that have high IQ's so its not only type specific.

  9. #49
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    2,056
    Mentioned
    168 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took a bunch of professional tests when I was 16, scored between 135/140, and there were many word play questions I remember. Then internet came out and I've tried new tests and in them my IQ sucked, all qs were in english so I excused myself thinking that I didnt understand well...

  10. #50

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,594
    Mentioned
    869 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    I took a bunch of professional tests when I was 16, scored between 135/140
    Tests may to have different scales for different ages. Human brain develops after 16 years. So you could get other number later.

    > all qs were in english so I excused myself thinking that I didnt understand well...

    it's important to test on your native language or with close language level
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  11. #51
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,360
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not enough people bragging.

    Someone once said that I wasn't aware of how smart I was, and then someone else jumped in and said, No. He is exactly aware of how smart he is. It was a pretty sick burn.

    Online Iq tests were 135-140, so I'd say probably 120 ish. I'm terrible with spacial reasoning fwiw.
    Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.

  12. #52
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    1,305
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some people take the onlinetest and say: I bet they make it easier to make people pay for the real test. People who make bad results say: I was tired. People who make the real test are rare and people who do not take it say those who take the real test have low iq for taking it coz its a scam. Some people try to impose their ideal self as high iq. Some people downplay the phenomenon of IQ. Some people just say IQ is not important, it is all about EQ. Its just a mess this IQ thing.

  13. #53
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Cognitive disorganization
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 ELFV?
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    Not enough people bragging.

    Someone once said that I wasn't aware of how smart I was, and then someone else jumped in and said, No. He is exactly aware of how smart he is. It was a pretty sick burn.

    Online Iq tests were 135-140, so I'd say probably 120 ish. I'm terrible with spacial reasoning fwiw.
    How is your chess playing skills?

    I'm not spatially good being exact. My mind works with fuzzy forms. I scored medium in some spatial tests while some sections give above average and other sections are below average.

    2D stuff is usually easy while 3D stuff is much much worse (I'm stereo blind – I can't see in 3D using both eyes) but I managed to get average in 3D test.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  14. #54
    IQ over 150 vesstheastralsilky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    INxJ Hybrid
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Was 135 in high school then over 150 per professionally certified book tests after I enhanced my math skills.
    ~* astralsilky

    4w5 that morphed into a 3w2 sx/sp
    Cancer Sun, Cancer/Leo Moon, Libra Ascendant, Pluto conjunct Ascendant, Sun conjunct Moon, Saturn conjunct Mercury conjunct MC in 10th, Jupiter handle of bucket pattern squares Nodes, Uranus biquintile Jupiter, Neptune sextile Ascendant, Lilith trine Ascendant, Venus in Gemini/Cancer in 9th house conjunct MC, Venus trine Uranus, Uranus conjunct Spica, Ascendant conjunct SuperGalactic Center, Sun inconjunct Galactic Center.

    Each essence is a separate glass,
    Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
    Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
    A thousand colors, but the Light is One.

    Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet

  15. #55
    Little Timmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    South America
    TIM
    Ne/Ti
    Posts
    36
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I only got tested professionally once when I was a little kid, they only gave percentiles in different areas and determined I was gifted. My parents never told me about the results (as far as I recall). I found the test ten years later and found I got 99.8th percentile in spatial visualization (or something like that) and 98th percentile in reasoning, which would be 146 and 133~ converted to IQ. I scored pretty bad in everything else though. I found a few sites with (relatively reliable) IQ tests for those who think theirs is 120+ (since traditional IQ tests are really bad at measuring outside of the 80-120 range). https://iqhaven.com/ has free tests and seems decent enough, although the site got revamped and it looks like crap now. I did the Mathematricius test which is math-only (https://iqhaven.com/matematricius-test) and scored 145. I think IQ tests are pretty bad though. If I hadn't gone through my Math and Algebra classes in university I would've probably scored much less.

    Quote Originally Posted by vesstheastralsilky View Post
    Was 135 in high school then over 150 per professionally certified book tests after I enhanced my math skills.
    Hmmm, this is pretty interesting. I also think training your math/verbal skills can get you (significantly) better scores in IQ tests, which is another reason why they're not so meaningful. There's also a big statistical discrepancy in small score differences: Consider someone of IQ 125, and someone of IQ 130, given a normal distribution with median 100 and SD 15. For every 10 people with 130 IQ you have 25 with 125 IQ, and yet the difference between one score and the other is usually just a few different questions answered correctly.

    IQ stands for Intelligence Quotient (though largely a misnomer now), and it's supposed to measure something that is relatively unchanged over the course of one's life. Then why is it possible for people to get (greatly) varying scores? That means that the method of measuring isn't good enough, or that it's measuring something other than intelligence, or that intelligence actually does change with time.

    In my opinion, IQ only gives you a rough measure of people's intelligence (as the ability to recognize patterns, solve novel problems, etc.) and a decent measure of mathematical ability, verbal ability, spatial ability, etc. Since these things are correlated with intelligence, someone who scores high in these factors (compared to other people) will likely be more intelligent than the median, but you can't "stack them up" with others in a normal distribution and say with certainty that they're smarter than XX.X% of the population, which is exactly what IQ tests do.

  16. #56
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    1,600
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    What's up with all the IQ threads? They are springing everywhere like mushrooms after a warm summer.
    .. why you keep getting mistyped as SLI

  17. #57
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    4,715
    Mentioned
    404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    .. why you keep getting mistyped as SLI
    that's an external sensory perception - not an internal one, though I get what you're saying

    in other news that's just a manifestation of the sp instinct - http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...on-SP-instinct

  18. #58
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    1,600
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    :3

  19. #59
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Cognitive disorganization
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 ELFV?
    Posts
    3,990
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    parts of super ego manifests strong in this one.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  20. #60
    IQ over 150 vesstheastralsilky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    INxJ Hybrid
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Timmy View Post
    I only got tested professionally once when I was a little kid, they only gave percentiles in different areas and determined I was gifted. My parents never told me about the results (as far as I recall). I found the test ten years later and found I got 99.8th percentile in spatial visualization (or something like that) and 98th percentile in reasoning, which would be 146 and 133~ converted to IQ. I scored pretty bad in everything else though. I found a few sites with (relatively reliable) IQ tests for those who think theirs is 120+ (since traditional IQ tests are really bad at measuring outside of the 80-120 range). https://iqhaven.com/ has free tests and seems decent enough, although the site got revamped and it looks like crap now. I did the Mathematricius test which is math-only (https://iqhaven.com/matematricius-test) and scored 145. I think IQ tests are pretty bad though. If I hadn't gone through my Math and Algebra classes in university I would've probably scored much less.



    Hmmm, this is pretty interesting. I also think training your math/verbal skills can get you (significantly) better scores in IQ tests, which is another reason why they're not so meaningful. There's also a big statistical discrepancy in small score differences: Consider someone of IQ 125, and someone of IQ 130, given a normal distribution with median 100 and SD 15. For every 10 people with 130 IQ you have 25 with 125 IQ, and yet the difference between one score and the other is usually just a few different questions answered correctly.

    IQ stands for Intelligence Quotient (though largely a misnomer now), and it's supposed to measure something that is relatively unchanged over the course of one's life. Then why is it possible for people to get (greatly) varying scores? That means that the method of measuring isn't good enough, or that it's measuring something other than intelligence, or that intelligence actually does change with time.

    In my opinion, IQ only gives you a rough measure of people's intelligence (as the ability to recognize patterns, solve novel problems, etc.) and a decent measure of mathematical ability, verbal ability, spatial ability, etc. Since these things are correlated with intelligence, someone who scores high in these factors (compared to other people) will likely be more intelligent than the median, but you can't "stack them up" with others in a normal distribution and say with certainty that they're smarter than XX.X% of the population, which is exactly what IQ tests do.
    Tests traditionally written by a psychometrician are a legitimate leveraging gauge at measuring one's intellectual capacities because they benchmark the mean average score for the majority at 100 and then normalize the distribution curve. It measures ability to think accurately and solve problems more than a Te/Si only style of reciting back memorized information. I hadn't realized how many free poser tests had become prevalent and written by non-psychometricians had flooded the internet and begun discrediting the profession accordingly until coming to this forum and seeing a few pejorative views (without merit).

    One can research and find the average IQ score by country. If I recall correctly Singapore was the highest at 107 as the average and the USA average has dropped from 100 to 98. President George Bush Jr.'s was only 100 when he tested. I remember that news hitting the radio when he was elected to office. Trump's is very high (and this statement doesn't mean I endorse him 100% because of his strong Ti).
    ~* astralsilky

    4w5 that morphed into a 3w2 sx/sp
    Cancer Sun, Cancer/Leo Moon, Libra Ascendant, Pluto conjunct Ascendant, Sun conjunct Moon, Saturn conjunct Mercury conjunct MC in 10th, Jupiter handle of bucket pattern squares Nodes, Uranus biquintile Jupiter, Neptune sextile Ascendant, Lilith trine Ascendant, Venus in Gemini/Cancer in 9th house conjunct MC, Venus trine Uranus, Uranus conjunct Spica, Ascendant conjunct SuperGalactic Center, Sun inconjunct Galactic Center.

    Each essence is a separate glass,
    Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
    Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
    A thousand colors, but the Light is One.

    Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet

  21. #61

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,594
    Mentioned
    869 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vesstheastralsilky View Post
    President George Bush Jr.'s was only 100 when he tested.
    According to wikipedia there is no trusted or official data about his IQ.

    > Trump's is very high (and this statement doesn't mean I endorse him 100% because of his strong Ti)

    he's EIE. the same clown which rules more by TV picture than really
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  22. #62
    IQ over 150 vesstheastralsilky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    INxJ Hybrid
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    According to wikipedia there is no trusted or official data about his IQ.

    > Trump's is very high (and this statement doesn't mean I endorse him 100% because of his strong Ti)

    he's EIE. the same clown which rules more by TV picture than really
    No SLE.

    As for Wikipedia, how convenient for one in power. I'm sure the radio report I heard was quickly trashed. After all, billions of dollars were about to be spent and lives lost under this man's authority and personal judgment.
    ~* astralsilky

    4w5 that morphed into a 3w2 sx/sp
    Cancer Sun, Cancer/Leo Moon, Libra Ascendant, Pluto conjunct Ascendant, Sun conjunct Moon, Saturn conjunct Mercury conjunct MC in 10th, Jupiter handle of bucket pattern squares Nodes, Uranus biquintile Jupiter, Neptune sextile Ascendant, Lilith trine Ascendant, Venus in Gemini/Cancer in 9th house conjunct MC, Venus trine Uranus, Uranus conjunct Spica, Ascendant conjunct SuperGalactic Center, Sun inconjunct Galactic Center.

    Each essence is a separate glass,
    Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
    Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
    A thousand colors, but the Light is One.

    Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet

  23. #63
    Morgana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    TIM
    LFEV
    Posts
    202
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I remember a 120 somewhere, don't know what test or the age I took it. It was at school though.

  24. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    TIM
    EII 4w5 Sx/So
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    idk 130+ though probably

    I like Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences

  25. #65
    Putting the fun in funeral prowthin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    PNW
    TIM
    H-ILI-Ni 5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    96
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was tested by a child psychologist and told that I am gifted.

    1516214088889.png
    H-ILI-Ni - 5w4 4w5 9w1 sx/sp - Eternal Anglo - Agnostic - Rightist Populist - Zoomer

    Ear byþ egle eorla gehwylcun,
    ðonne fæstlice flæsc onginneþ,
    hraw colian, hrusan ceosan
    blac to gebeddan; bleda gedreosaþ,
    wynna gewitaþ, wera geswicaþ.

  26. #66
    kalinoche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,022
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    115
    honest labor needs no master

    Nothing good is a miracle, nothing lovely is a dream.

    Επί πάντων μέμνησο τα έσχατά σου, και ου μη αμαρτήσης

  27. #67
    strrrng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,853
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Haven't been administered a full battery, but based on the tests I have taken I would assume somewhere in the top 1%.
    4w3-5w6-8w7

  28. #68
    Impermanence para's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Speculative sensation
    Posts
    657
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Spatial abstraction/logic/problem solving is hard for me to do, so i'd assume not very high.
    ''Time is a child playing draughts, the kingly power is a child's.''

  29. #69
    hag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    TIM
    ESI-Fi
    Posts
    1,819
    Mentioned
    337 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by para View Post
    Spatial abstraction/logic/problem solving is hard for me to do, so i'd assume not very high.
    me2. i suck at logic and i dont score highly on IQ tests even the bullshit ones (but especially not pattern recognition tests). i think around ~100 or whatevers average, maybe below. tho ive not been tested professionally.

  30. #70
    fka lungs ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,609
    Mentioned
    725 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    I only know what my parents told me about the IQ test I took as a really little kid, which is a high number but both of them are highly prone to exaggeration and I'm certain my IQ is lower than it was when I was a kid. My estimation of my own intelligence is probably slightly above average. I saw my brothers official result of 140 and he's a little quicker than I am but we communicate easily.

  31. #71
    To Stand As The Oak Luminous Lynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Wilderness
    TIM
    H-EIE-Ni2
    Posts
    272
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    132

    "We live in an age in which there is no heroic death."



    Model A: EIE-Ni2
    -
    Model G: EI

    Quadra Values: Beta
    Dyad:
    /
    DCNH: Harmonizing
    Enneagram: 6w7, 2w1, 8w9
    Instinctual Variant: Sx/So

  32. #72
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,660
    Mentioned
    230 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    60
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  33. #73
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    4,957
    Mentioned
    635 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    When I was 11 years old, my school principal called in the Stanford-Binet people to give me an IQ test. They asked me a bunch of questions, like, what if you need to move stuff across a river in a boat? It took all afternoon, and they said my IQ was "high 140's", which I take to be about 147. This didn't get me any better treatment from my mother, as far as I could tell, so it was pretty irrelevant to me.

    Since IQ and age are inversely related, I'd estimate my present IQ at about 17, which is still larger than my shoe size.

  34. #74
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,685
    Mentioned
    860 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    After following a link, posted to a server today, I ended up on this article.

    If the IQ test forced upon you was under 130, like mine, or you only have a rough estimate from the average of your online tests you can now take heart in these findings. You may be smarter than you, or others, think.


    You use recreational drugs


    Psychology Today

    According to Psychology Today, people who use more drugs are more intelligent. "Intelligent people don't always do the right thing," they write, "only the evolutionarily novel thing."

    According to a study conducted by National Child Development, "more intelligent children in the United Kingdom are more likely to grow up to consume psychoactive drugs than less intelligent children." These drugs include marijuana, cocaine, heroin, alcohol and tobacco.

    The chart on the left shows the findings of the study. It depicts the latent factor for the consumption of 13 different kinds of psychoactive drugs, (cannabis, ecstasy, amphetamines, LSD, amyl nitrate, magic mushrooms, cocaine, temazepan, semeron, ketamine, crack, heroin, and methadone). There is a clear association between childhood general intelligence and adult drug consumption.

    "Very bright individuals (with IQs above 125) are roughly three-tenths of a standard deviation more likely to consume psychoactive drugs than very dull individuals," says Psychology Today. They ran the same study in the U.S. and found similar results.
    20 Scientifically-Proven Signs You're Smarter Than Average

    14/20 Not too bad. I don't want my brain volume measured just yet. I will look to dna and my MRI scan for a rough estimate.

    Please remember that although some have high IQ they may still be LQ in other areas. Yep I totally stole than from a former forum member.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung

     



  35. #75
    Doctor Weird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne C
    Posts
    343
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I am in the 120-130 range, but I'm probably overestimating.

  36. #76
    the lurker Mio Q's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    TIM
    IEE-H ... maybe
    Posts
    261
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    2

    JEFFREY DAHMER OF BUGS




    "If a lot of people love each other the world will be a better place to live!"

    -Tommy Wiseau

  37. #77
    عالم نفسي thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,949
    Mentioned
    277 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Never took an IQ test, but I did get a nearly perfect score on the SAT.

    Also, I once did a memory span test for a psychology experiment where they say longer and longer sequences of numbers, and you have to repeat them backwards. The examiner said I was the first person to get a perfect score.

    Anyways, IQ is overrated.

  38. #78
    the Lycanthrope Remiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Terra Incognita
    TIM
    Ni-ILI 468 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,661
    Mentioned
    67 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IQ points are just cocoanuts for the monkeys!
    "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." ―Thucydides



  39. #79

  40. #80
    Varlawend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    ILI-H, 594 sp/sx
    Posts
    61
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Anyways, IQ is overrated.
    Completely agreed. The last IQ test I took I got a perfect score on (indicating ~150+), and I had taken a similar test years before having got one question wrong. You can actually get better at those kinds of tests without necessarily becoming appreciably more "intelligent" in reality.

    Nassim Taleb posted an (IMO) insightful criticism of IQ not long ago, showing it to be flawed from a mathematical and complex systems perspective:

    https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-lar...e-f131c101ba39

    Background : “IQ” is a stale test meant to measure mental capacity but in fact mostly measures extreme unintelligence (learning difficulties), as well as, to a lesser extent, a form of intelligence, stripped of 2nd order effects. It is via negativa not via positiva. Designed for learning disabilities, and given that it is not too needed there (see argument further down), it ends up selecting for exam-takers, paper shufflers, obedient IYIs (intellectuals yet idiots), ill adapted for “real life”. The concept is poorly thought out mathematically (a severe flaw in correlation under fat tails, fails to properly deal with dimensionality, treats the mind as an instrument not a complex system)...

    I think Socionics could go a ways towards advancing a more precise, flexible and useful concept of mental capacity.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •