Those who identify with the 'left' see me as a 'right'-wing extremist. Those who identify with the 'right' see me as a 'left'-wing extremist.
Politics is a battle of interests. Not the moral or the immoral, the right and the wrong, the good and the bad. It is the battle of groups and the structure in which they desire the world to be. I identify those who see the world in 'left' or 'right' with the rabble.
Between the 'left' and the 'right' I am equally disgusted. Modern politics is a battle of moralisms. The rightist berates me for saying: 'goddamn!', the leftist berates me for saying: '******!'. The rightist berates me for defending the revolution of the oppressed, the leftist berates me for defending the authority of the oppressor. Isolated from these two group interests I say: 'to the victor belong the spoils! let god stamp the seal of nobility on those who emerge victorious in this struggle!' but as an individual part of society I say: 'the world shall be how I will it to be and all those who oppose me deserve death'
Now in the broader historical sense of the struggle which I identify my world to be in, I identify myself with the 'left' in this struggle. In this struggle I intend to be the victor, and I would defend the status quo of my revolution to such an extent that would make any conservative blush.
My ideal society would be a free association of producers notwithstanding my harsh criticisms of 'egalitarian' ideologies and 'revolutions' in the past which occurred in the name of 'equality' and especially the Alpha Enlightenment value of 'progress' . Obviously I am not a fan of what today we deem as the 'capitalist mode of production' but it should also be obvious that the reason why I oppose the 'capitalist system' is because my ideals and my individuality get the short end of the stick in that relationship. Simultaneously I am also sympathetic to those who oppose general 'freedom'. Particularly my dual, whose primary 'modus operandi' is power over others. In other words I support the power of proletariat over bourgeoise, and believe from this will arise a new aristocracy. See: §257 of Nietzche's 'Beyond Good & Evil' to understand what it is that I am elucidating to. And yes to right wingers I am aware of Nietzsche's hostility towards proletarian movements and no quoting him does not contradict my worldview at all. Right-Nietzscheanism is as ignorant and stupid as Left-Nietzscheanism as Nietzsche takes with one hand what he gives with the other.
I hope I did not offend anybody as it was not my intention.
*Edit: The forum censored one of my words in the third stanza. The word in is an epithet for 'homosexuality' that begins with the letter 'F'. I have absolutely no problem with what contemporary morality has labeled 'homosexuality' and would absolutely defend the right for 'homosexuals' to be as they are. In fact I associate 'homosexuality' with high cultural achievement as 'homosexuality'— or more accurately pederasty has been a theme in many great literary works. The censorship of this word in this post reminded me a time in which I was talking to a girl and referred to a group of males whom I deemed to be weak as '******s' in a critical way. My use of language was immediately met with condemnation from her and that I should be more considerate to the feelings of others. Mind you, the 'feelings' of 'others' who were not even present in the conversation to begin with. Needless to say, that individual has cut off contact from me after that exchange due to my refusal to admit my wrongdoing. If this was any indication of the future of our conversations then I am glad than she did— because there is nothing that I most abhor than those who try to police sentiment. However, I do not hold this person in contempt for their view as it could be that they hail from a place in which gay people were a marginalized group and probably associate that sort of language with unscrupulous people. Again however, those who try to police speaking in such a way as to remove 'insensitive' language deserve to have the shit kicked of them by an SLE.