Truer words have never been spoken.[ILE is characterized by] lack of diplomacy and ability to "lick" in time.
Truer words have never been spoken.[ILE is characterized by] lack of diplomacy and ability to "lick" in time.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Thanks for this post shotgunfingers
It's a balancing game, if you remove all statistical significance with too many corrections then those corrections have issues in themselves because they make the whole exercise useless by throwing out valid data. You can always add more filters but at some point the signal gets eaten up by the filter.
I think these results are interesting, but of course require applying more than a grain of salt and common sense if you want to use them.
I think it's an interesting dump of raw data, not processed conclusions that should be used without other more reliable information as context. You can sift through it and maybe you find something useful that can be used as yet another supporting viewpoint when dissecting the typical characteristics of types.
Where’s the English version
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Talanov: "EIE = gay"
EIE-Fe Creative 7w8 748 Sx/So VELF
For the ESI, the data has to have been at least 80% from Sensory subtype test takers. For the IEE, most of the data is from intuitive subtype test takers; the ethical subtype is generally detail oriented and more visually aware than that and generally likes nice things (the intuitive subtype is one of the least materialistic types). The intuitive subtype is mostly into science and humanities while the ethical subtype is mostly into drama/theater, art, and business; they're not as talkative and sociable on average as the Ne subtype is, but they have better social skills and higher IQ on average, they're a lot more adaptable.
I think the Donald is SLI-Si actually. Just one that doesn't want to get to the root of things, seeks attention, is hypocritical, accepts the status quo blindly on ethical issues("there are good people on both sides" about white nationalists vs counterprotesters in Charlottesville) and isn't able to critically assess any Ne-patterns that come his way(denies climate change, now accepts it to gain voter support, but doesn't get science), uses misleading facts(evil Ti demonstrative) as a way to manipulate voter decisions, which is a Te-goal (ie. spreads misinformation about QAnon, then says "I don't know anything. I'm just retweeting opinions". Wtf? Why does he post something he's unsure of when he spends half his term talking about "fake news"? Is he really stupid enough to think no one knows he just uses information that suits him to slander democrats?)
He's not Se-dom because even if he has strong Se, he isn't using it. I don't see him creating strict power relations, it's more talky talky instead of do-y do-y as with SLEs.
@Duschia you make a lot of good points there However, from an information metabolism point of view, I can't see his Se in another position than ignoring and his Ne as inferior. And he's definitely not a Se-Ni valuer, he has no vision whatsoever for the US ('Make the US great again' is not a vision, it's a cold war memorabilia; it's just about nostalgia) and he doesn't ask for discipline from himself or anyone to achieve one; his campaign is mostly based on PR stunts and support rallies("look! everybody cares about me!") rather than any appeal to forceful mobilisation("I was brought to power for a reason!").
He's also not Ep. When he does Se, it always sounds like empty threats to me; like when he threatened North Korea, I'd never believe the situation could in fact escalate because there was no real reason for it, and the Se/Ne consequences would have been completely catastrophic without any gain for western countries. It was only about Trump saying to North Korea: "Look! I'm peeing into your pool because I'm a bad bad boiiiiiii woof woof".
I think he could be a 'weird' Ip bc most measures he implemented were not proactive, but reactive to public sentiment or party pressure(let's build a wall! let's dissolve Obamacare! etc...); even on Twitter he needs to have a retort about everything; there seems to be very little experimentation(Ep), personal convictions and rules(Ij) or ambitious proactive projects(Ej).
I think you're right about Ti>Te for him; now I lean towards SEI-Si.
ESE - Hell to the fuck no. Immediately revolting.
SEI - Some fit well, some are the opposite.
ILE - 50/50... not sure it would be a good fit, but thanks for the music recommendation.
LII - Sure I guess? Nothing stands out, but nothing is truly wrong either.
SLE - No, not really relatable. But I could agree with the person's choices/preferences. At least he is sadistic rather than annoying.
LSI - Don't think so.
IEI - I ain't sweet.
EIE - Definitely not.
SEE - sexy but not me
ESI - not me, but bread is nice. the LII and ESI should hook up together and make pizza.
ILI - definitely not
LIE - definitely not
SLI - Almost relatable.
LSE - no
IEE - some of these are oddly extremely relatable, but overall is not relatable at all.
EII - This could work.. but a bit too sensitive and weak for me.
IEI: "Tensions with complex household appliances."
Talanov gets me!!
Last edited by persimmonism; 05-26-2021 at 11:34 PM.
I know these. I discovered them couple of years ago when I was OBSESSED with socionics. I don't think I like these. I cannot explain why, but something feels wrong about these results.
Thanks, this is the most awesome thing I have found as of yet on this site. I especially like the parts where it lists all the properties that distinguish one type from another.
forsitan mea potentia increvit nimis