Socionics Calculator

[idontgiveaf]

I think the best way to type yourself is by reflecting your relationship with every type.

Using socionics Calculator as a basis,

Write down the nearest type you think you are, then type all the 16types here and your relationship with each type plus percentage.

Your type:
1~16 (relationship): (percentage)


Here's the socionics Calculator :

http://www.sociotype.com/tools/

After that reflect if how you behave with the person possessing each type matches with the percentage and inter-type relationship status

[idontgiveaf]

I actually just experiment this shit earlier then i think what if I'm an ILE?

So ILe:

1. ILI (intj/mbti intp)- Mirror: 80%
2. ILE (entp) - Identical: 91%
3. ESE (esfj)- Activity: 89%
4. SEI (isfj) - Dual: 100%
5. LSI (istj/mbti istp) - Supervisory: 41%
6. LSE (estp) - Look-a-like: 57%
7. EIE (enfj) - Benefactor: 39%
8. IEI ( INfP/mbti infj) - Illusionary: 59%
9. LSE (estj) - Beneficiary: 43%
10. ESI ( isfj/mbti isfp) - Conflicting: 0%
11. SEE (esfp) - Super ego:27%
12. LIE (ENTJ) - quasi identical - 18%
13. ILI (intp/ mbti intj) - Contrary: 18%
14. EII (infj/ mbti infp) - Supervisee: 36%
15. IEE(enfp) - kindred: 57%
16. SLI (istp/mbti istj) - Semi dual: 59%

[idontgiveaf]

So ILe:

1. ILI (intj/mbti intp)- Mirror: 80%
> yes i really hang out with ili very well irl
2. ILE (entp) - Identical: 91%
> probably lol i don't know because I'm a girl. I only know ile males. But ile in real life is very nice and easy to talk.and they're funny
3. ESE (esfj)- Activity: 89%
> esfj likes me. And yes xD irl, i had two esfjs hangout like one esfj and her family with me hangout in one smug place with her kids xD and then i also had accompanied my esfj friend in one country because she likes me lol xD
4. SEI (isfj) - Dual: 100%
> I don't know about this
5. LSI (istj/mbti istp) - Supervisory: 41%
> yes lol xD this is quite accurate because one istp which is also a programmer likes me and look up to me asking me stuffs because he thinks I'm good lol xD
6. LSE (estp) - Look-a-like: 57%
> yesss. Lol. Estps. Hang out very well
7. EIE (enfj) - Benefactor: 39%
> lol Benefactor? in romance side, i just realized that eie likes me because i don't know xD but yeah. I sometimes think they're just using me tehe like I'm always there for them but then, it seems like i don't get anything. They like the way i am.
8. IEI ( INfP/mbti infj) - Illusionary: 59%
> yeah make sense now
9. LSE (estj) - Beneficiary: 43%
> probably Because of Te. At my workplace, me estj boss doesn't really like me but i somehow tries to please him? Because he's a boss duhh. But I'm really amazed of how he use Te. Like he's able to think stuffs i totally overlook in the programs i create.
10. ESI ( isfj/mbti isfp) - Conflicting: 0%
> i Dunno. But i had conflicts with my sister when i was a kid we always hurt each other like we totally bleed.
11. SEE (esfp) - Super ego:27%
> hmmm. actually esfp have really different kind of friends. like I don't have esfp.. Oh i had one. She called me bff. But she's just using me basically because i was popular back then and she loses her friends and it's either she'll hangout with FJ types which she hates or me. But then we really don't have anything in common aside from friends and that's all. Just only friends but one on one, it's really awkward. It's all about her.
12. LIE (ENTJ) - quasi identical - 18%
> wakaranai
13. ILI (intp/ mbti intj) - Contrary: 18%
> MAKE MORE SENSE I HATE THE ILI I KNOW
14. EII (infj/ mbti infp) - Supervisee: 36%
> hmmm. Probably xD oh yeah even on forums some infp asks me for advices probably that's it
15. IEE(enfp) - kindred: 57%
> yes lol xDD
16. SLI (istp/mbti istj) - Semi dual: 59%
> my last real life crush was istj he likes me very much i swear xDDD Damn i don't actually know if he's isfj? Hmmm.

Probably isfj omggg he's my dual?? He's really amused at me i swear specially when i talk.. D like i like how he smiles and just aaawwwwwww. It's gone now. Too bad.

[Sol]

you'll fail on the step of opinions about types of others

"Identical"
Psychological Compatibility Rating: Excellent (91%)

this number is also for "long-term romantic relationships"

funny people

[Spermatozoa]

SEE-1Fi

vs

LII: Conflicting (0%)
A TOTAL and UTTER LOSER. Incredibly annoying, constantly nitpicks and finds fault in everything.

ILE: Super-ego (27%)
Not much better than LII, they are crazy, neurotic loose cannons. Weird.

ESE: Quasi-identical (18%)
Nag nag nag nag nag. Over plans, obsessed with cleanliness, ugh.

SEI: Contrary (18%)
A ball of anxiety that can never make up its mind.

LSI: Supervisee of (32%)
They are OK, but can become kind of boring after a while.

SLE: Kindred (52%)
Fun to be around, and easy to talk to, but they really need to learn when to mind their own business.

EIE: Beneficiary of (41%)
They are usually hot, but not in a way I find attractive.

IEI: Semi-dual (52%)
Kind of mysterious and sexy, but also a bit helpless and aimless.

ESI: Mirror (77%)
Very hot, passionate, very sexual. These girls have the assets.

SEE: Identical (91%)
The easiest type to befriend, as it's almost instant but they are not very sexually attractive to me. They make a good wingman/woman though.

LIE: Activity (82%)
No experience with women of this type. But the men are awesome to work with, because we just get shit done. No questions asked.

ILI: Dual (98%)
Again only men alas, but they seem much like LIE except quieter, which I prefer. I admire their gift for strategy and ruthlessness.

EII: Supervisor of (45%)
I attract these girls all the time. They are annoying as hell, oversensitive and fragile. Leave me alone.

IEE: Look-a-like (64%)
Fun to be around as long as they don't have strong political or religious views, which make it awkward.

LSE: Benefactor of (45%)
I have a quite good relationship with people of this type. It is not very sexual, but we work well on a team.

SLI: Illusionary (66%)
Yeah, I know quite a few, men and women. They like me, but I don't feel fully satisfied.

[Chae]

@Olimpia made something similar elsewhere, I forgot what it was. I also remember @Director Abbie creating tables for that. Which thread was that again?

[idontgiveaf]

you'll fail on the step of opinions about types of others

"Identical"
Psychological Compatibility Rating: Excellent (91%)

this number is also for "long-term romantic relationships"

funny people

Well the basis is socionics not your own basis xDDD

Because actually we can say our opinion but then, lots of opinions already like you don't know who to believe anymore

[Sol]

Well the basis is socionics not your own basis

The basis is your relations with concrete people, while as you mistake in their types with significant probability this makes the task of understanding of own type based on this as doubtful.

[idontgiveaf]

The basis is your relations with concrete people, while as you mistake in their types with significant probability this makes the task of understanding of own type based on this as doubtful.

Why would i? Well i can be mistaken if they're just my acquaintances.