I'm sure this has been discussed a dozen times before but I don't wanna try to figure out the right search terms.
So function placement determines the places your mind goes and your natural thought patterns, but does it necessarily imply strengths and weaknesses?
I mean if you view the world primarily through the lens of Ne then it probably follows that you'll be good at seeing potential, etc. & I understand that. But does it always work that way?
Is it possible to be objectively better at say, creative or HA because those are your natural skills genetically or for some reason outside of socionics?


Reply With Quote
ignoring applies to the latter.
is good
you'd be IEI or so. If an EII can effectively monitor and manipulate their comfort state and that of others/
they're not EII. Being objectively better needs a comparative element which are the objectively worse elements, 2D, 1D.

or
, I assume you can't be serious.
