Click 'like' if you agree.
Click 'constructive' if you strongly agree.
Sol should make a typing video
Click 'like' if you agree.
Click 'constructive' if you strongly agree.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Yeeeeeeees girl, you give me life. Finally. It's time.
Emotional state VI of this kid: gloatingOriginally Posted by Chae
My verdict: Rational type
Last edited by WinnieW; 10-27-2017 at 06:06 PM.
I type the people in the backgroundEmotional state VI of this kid: gloatingPoLR because they aren't doing anything
That is a photo, you know, not a video. You can't see people moving around on a photo.I type the people in the background
In that specificy case. There is not much about what the fire fighters can do. The house – made of wood – is on full fire. Their priority is to prevent that houses nearby catch fire.
The house and the inventory is lost anyway. Wooden constructions on full fire are difficult to extinguish.
Here's a secret. I have superhuman abilities that let me animate pictures into gifs when I turn on my laser eyes.That is a photo, you know, not a video. You can't see people moving around on a photo.
Make me reasonable and enough arguments - and I'll do.
Don't you know? The ladies love typing videos. Gets 'em every time.
I'm old school. When a lady have interest to me and I to her, - then we meet IRL. No camera may transfer my charm.Don't you know? The ladies love typing videos. Gets 'em every time.
To fit "enough" you'll need to do it many times.
Until she'll unground herself, I may don't worry.
If you do it then I'll do it. You can hold me to that.I'm old school. When a lady have interest to me and I to her, - then we meet IRL. No camera may transfer my charm.
Indeed, a woman does usually get somewhat looser over time. You just have to plough her regularly.
It's pleasure to see how others accept my wisdom.
> Indeed, a woman does usually get somewhat looser over time. You just have to plough her regularly.
All you need is love, Cuivienen, then you'll not be perceived as a looser by a woman. In other case you'll become boring for both you sometimes, despite your and her qualities.
I'll give you $1
Aušra Augustinavičūtiė will ground you if you don't.
i'd watch it. cock in hand.
LOL
You ask everyone else to make a video, so you yourself should too.
Offer urologists to show their stuff by this fascinating logics.You ask everyone else to make a video, so you yourself should too.
Except you are not a doctor.Offer urologists to show their stuff by this fascinating logics.
Not.Except you are not a doctor.
I don't ask to identify my type.
And >90% people on forums have much lesser typing experience (which also fits to theory) than me, so my opinion has other weight to interest them. If I see someone's behavior is strange for the said type and offer to make typing thread with video, there is good chance the type is other indeed. I also say arguments in such cases sometimes. Chae, Cosmic Teapot, lavos, etc. - behave strangely for the types in their profiles. And to make a video to be sure in their type is not hard for them. They may get problems from own wrong types, I offer them help.
P -ersonally, it would be nice to see you
A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Y -es you have to expose yourself
B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
C -hae demands it, period
K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
I meant my profit.
> A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Because I have no doubts in own type. I ask video in a hope the other person will get or has such doubts.
> Y -es you have to expose yourself
This place is for thoughts' exposion.
> B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
I send my condolences, but do not notice my profit still. There are LSE examples in my bloggers list. And I'm not against others thought me as wrong type - this gives lols me often.
> A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
there are not bad examples already
> C -hae demands it, period
and such Chae have made another hopeless demand in her life
> K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
when you'll gather 100k votes then I'll think. I promise
Last edited by Sol; 10-27-2017 at 11:36 PM.
Yes, there is significant possibility he or any other will type me wrongly, while I'm sure I did it correctly. As a typer Gulenko is not more respected than other experienced. He's known as long-time practitioner-lecturer, by not bad early texts and later doubtful hypothesis which are not taken seriously.
> You know those people better than anyone?
I know them enough to be sure in their types, when I'm sure.
> If you just using a nonverbal things, then are you already aware of something cultural non-verbal things that they showed?
I have no basis to think there are significant cultural distortions in the nonverbal I'm using for typing. In a bad case I'll get contradictive impressions and no sure opinion, or my mistakes may rise a little.
> Do you think that someone who is LSE in your place, is still LSE when that person moved into my place?
Yes. A type is the balance of functions in a person's consciousness, what does not relate to external conditions. Similarly he'll not become left-handed.
> When you're sure about yourself, you put at least 90% as your accuracy score.
90% is the lowest assurance when is said that I'm sure. In concrete cases the % may be higher. I had no doubts in own type from 2003 year, while I'm checking it by IR with many people typed by me IRL and in the net. So it's near 100% still.
> But when others are sure about themselves, you put at most 30% as their accuracy score.
My opinion about skills of others is based on their objective average match, - 20% the highest I saw still, what means the common accuracy should be ~50% and that's bad. Also I see the common match with me where I'm sure - max 30%, what means their accuracy (for me) is < 33%.
While about own skills I decide based on my personal experience, where I see how people fit good to the theory with my types versions and hence I'm sure in those versions, and when my imressions are same after time. 90% is from <10% possible changes in my opinion after some time when I was sure, in conditions when my skills does not change significantly and the quality of typing material is similar. For example, you may see my blogger's list - I'm removing from it some examples regularly, this quantity seems <10%.
Any experienced typer uses similar approach, I suppose.
> I apologize for my argument. I promise I'll delete it at 9am Pacific time tomorrow.
There is nothing to apologize for and no need to delete.
I added some further explainations to my privious post, Chae.
Money
Your intention is to pay Sol for making a video?
No, money is the answer to everything, that's why I used it. He ain't worth my sexy cash nor am I the pimp of 16typesYour intention is to pay Sol for making a video?
You just have them not enough the get the answer on this question.
lungs offered $1. Just calculate wages of director, writer
, operator
, acting
, post-production
, etc. And that all should be me. *huh*
This costs more. I just can't work without profit, I'm not a philanthropist here.
Yes. If sol made a video, I'll do one
Honestly, Sol is one of the few people on this forum whose type is clear to me without video evidence. I ask more for my personal amusement.
You should do it because you're always pestering everyone else to do it, @Sol. What's good for the gander is good for the goose!
Only in case I'd wanted opinions of locals about own type. Like you, for example.
Sure. If you'll place your example, there will be more chance I'll do this.
Aramas may join your approach too.
Neither of us is in search of your typing for us, I fear.Sure. If you'll place your example, there will be more chance I'll do this.
Aramas may join your approach too.
But I would lead by example if I told everyone to try a chocolate diet. Just for the fun of it.
The main thing you should fear - is your opinion about own type correct or not.
The important in all said by me is - if you are unsure in own type and ask others about it, then you need to give good typing material, what means to give video. And if you think your typing skills are good and you analyzed your type good to be sure in it - there is no need to give video.
While to give video to me or to others does not matter in the context. What being T type (as you dreamed yourself recently) you should to understand, while you do not, what is not the 1st case of your T issues. And that's why I recommended you in past to make a typing thread with the video, as you highly probably mistaked in own type thinking it as SLI. Same I recommend you again, as you have removed your type and significantly probably either you are not sure in own type still or think it as some doubtful T type.
It was funny and interesting to read again your nonsense to get the conformation of my previous opinion about your type. I suspect your type is SEI, mostly.
Sol should make a typing video, not because you assholes think you're getting one over on him, but because I genuinely want to see him
There was my child photo. I'm common human with LSE type, which just messes with psychology as a hobby. Nothing really interesting, at least for those who are not unmarried pretty girls.
sorry about your SEI typing cosmic teapot, better luck in the next life
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
