Only in case I'd wanted opinions of locals about own type. Like you, for example.Originally Posted by Aramas
Only in case I'd wanted opinions of locals about own type. Like you, for example.
Sure. If you'll place your example, there will be more chance I'll do this.
Aramas may join your approach too.
Neither of us is in search of your typing for us, I fear.Sure. If you'll place your example, there will be more chance I'll do this.
Aramas may join your approach too.
But I would lead by example if I told everyone to try a chocolate diet. Just for the fun of it.
Sol should make a typing video, not because you assholes think you're getting one over on him, but because I genuinely want to see him
The main thing you should fear - is your opinion about own type correct or not.
The important in all said by me is - if you are unsure in own type and ask others about it, then you need to give good typing material, what means to give video. And if you think your typing skills are good and you analyzed your type good to be sure in it - there is no need to give video.
While to give video to me or to others does not matter in the context. What being T type (as you dreamed yourself recently) you should to understand, while you do not, what is not the 1st case of your T issues. And that's why I recommended you in past to make a typing thread with the video, as you highly probably mistaked in own type thinking it as SLI. Same I recommend you again, as you have removed your type and significantly probably either you are not sure in own type still or think it as some doubtful T type.
It was funny and interesting to read again your nonsense to get the conformation of my previous opinion about your type. I suspect your type is SEI, mostly.
sorry about your SEI typing cosmic teapot, better luck in the next life
There was my child photo. I'm common human with LSE type, which just messes with psychology as a hobby. Nothing really interesting, at least for those who are not unmarried pretty girls.
Yes, there is significant possibility he or any other will type me wrongly, while I'm sure I did it correctly. As a typer Gulenko is not more respected than other experienced. He's known as long-time practitioner-lecturer, by not bad early texts and later doubtful hypothesis which are not taken seriously.
> You know those people better than anyone?
I know them enough to be sure in their types, when I'm sure.
> If you just using a nonverbal things, then are you already aware of something cultural non-verbal things that they showed?
I have no basis to think there are significant cultural distortions in the nonverbal I'm using for typing. In a bad case I'll get contradictive impressions and no sure opinion, or my mistakes may rise a little.
> Do you think that someone who is LSE in your place, is still LSE when that person moved into my place?
Yes. A type is the balance of functions in a person's consciousness, what does not relate to external conditions. Similarly he'll not become left-handed.
> When you're sure about yourself, you put at least 90% as your accuracy score.
90% is the lowest assurance when is said that I'm sure. In concrete cases the % may be higher. I had no doubts in own type from 2003 year, while I'm checking it by IR with many people typed by me IRL and in the net. So it's near 100% still.
> But when others are sure about themselves, you put at most 30% as their accuracy score.
My opinion about skills of others is based on their objective average match, - 20% the highest I saw still, what means the common accuracy should be ~50% and that's bad. Also I see the common match with me where I'm sure - max 30%, what means their accuracy (for me) is < 33%.
While about own skills I decide based on my personal experience, where I see how people fit good to the theory with my types versions and hence I'm sure in those versions, and when my imressions are same after time. 90% is from <10% possible changes in my opinion after some time when I was sure, in conditions when my skills does not change significantly and the quality of typing material is similar. For example, you may see my blogger's list - I'm removing from it some examples regularly, this quantity seems <10%.
Any experienced typer uses similar approach, I suppose.
> I apologize for my argument. I promise I'll delete it at 9am Pacific time tomorrow.
There is nothing to apologize for and no need to delete.
So sol Where's your vid now
awaites for the financing
Give me your credit card number. I'll transfer the money 💵awaites for the financing
I'll give something around 0.51 €.
I suggest Bitcoin (and I will only use it).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I only have satoshis lolol
10 min is ~1/10 of typical movie lenght. Hence it would need 1/10 of typical Hollywood movie budget.
looks lieisn't your strongest suite
Some figures on blockbusters
$140M /movie
Therefore you only need $14 M.
Well, I'm happy with $100 k.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What? 🤔 i didn't get it? Further explain10 min is ~1/10 of typical movie lenght. Hence it would need 1/10 of typical Hollywood movie budget.
Send me your credit card number. I'll send 100klooks lie
Some figures on blockbusters
$140M /movie
Therefore you only need $14 M.
Well, I'm happy with $100 k.
it's evident
3L7jrbJEdYe6mPL6yJ3ab8JRBNYhqfBfSj
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Your special talent is to write nonsense.
Sent
3L7jrbJEdYe6mPL6yJ3ab8JRBNYhqfBfSj
But I'm a diva too.He's a Diva, lol
But I'm a diva too.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
C-ILE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
LIE
LOL
....well?
Relatable. My influence stretches as far as the four quadras of the socion >
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I'm still awaiting my $1 million for the production.
I think if you aim to be fair person then you should be in huge debt assuming that you are not a millionaire.I'm still awaiting my $1 million for the production.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Let's raise this thread again
I have an idea about his type
There’s a thread like this? Lol
He’s so Estj though
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
