Type Me

[squark]

Yeah. IRL I tend to probably use a larger vocabulary overall, but I do try to be direct and to the point when speaking. I have been told I'm very honest about things and can be blunt, for sure. I don't like what I'm saying to be confused so I try to say exactly what I intend or think... though how well I actually get my point across varies. Some people, especially online, seem to take offense at what I say and have referred to me as "abrasive" or harsh. Online there's less filter so I probably speak more forthrightly than I would in person... though it depends, of course too.

Yeah, I also offend people without intending to just by saying what I think.

[Bertrand]

there are significant differences between squark who falls into one camp, and retsu/cuvinen who I perceive as lumped in a separate and distinct camp. I don't feel whatever is working against one necessarily captures whats going on with the other

squark never comes across as insecure is what I would peg it to, for example retsu/cuv always allude to the inner yet misunderstood virtue of their "directness" like they don't understand that its not that people just can't handle such a "straight shooter" its that the stuff they're saying is stupid for reasons other than how direct it is. a directly formulated truth is actually quite beautiful. squark is probably more direct in a lot of ways, and yet somehow incurs less trouble. that's the joke; all this talk about "directness" and it all comes across like a scam, which is what people pick up on. directness is not the problem, squark is direct and its not the source of issues, its the self delusion that people's inability to handle "directness" is where the trouble is with whatever is being said, which is in itself either a form of innocent naivete, or a lie masquerading as "direct" which is anything but direct, its a literal misdirection

the only similarity is both camps think they're being direct, or at least present themselves as being direct, whether they actually are is the question

everyone offends someone by saying exactly what they think (unless its a universally accepted tautology: "helping people is good" for example) because not everyone values the same thing, which is precisely the point, its the underlying value statement or truth or falsity that causes the controversy

its funny cause both these jokers probably hate feminism but their argument boils down to: "you just can't handle a strong independent woman!" except in this case its a male.. its like no, that's really not it

[Retsu77]

Yeah, I also offend people without intending to just by saying what I think.

What type are you?

[ashlesha]

everyone offends someone by saying exactly what they think because not everyone values the same thing, which is precisely the point, its the underlying value statement or truth or falsity that causes the controversy

[Retsu77]

there are significant differences between squark who falls into one camp, and retsu/cuvinen who I perceive as lumped in a separate and distinct camp. I don't feel whatever is working against one necessarily captures whats going on with the other

squark never comes across as insecure is what I would peg it to, for example retsu/cuv always allude to the inner yet misunderstood virtue of their "directness" like they don't understand that its not that people just can't handle such a "straight shooter" its that the stuff they're saying is stupid for reasons other than how direct it is. a directly formulated truth is actually quite beautiful. squark is probably more direct in a lot of ways, and yet somehow incurs less trouble. that's the joke; all this talk about "directness" and it all comes across like a scam, which is what people pick up on. directness is not the problem, squark is direct and its not the source of issues, its the self delusion that people's inability to handle "directness" is where the trouble is with whatever is being said, which is in itself either a form of innocent naivete, or a lie masquerading as "direct" which is anything but direct, its a literal misdirection

the only similarity is both camps think they're being direct, or at least present themselves as being direct, whether they actually are is the question

everyone offends someone by saying exactly what they think (unless its a universally accepted tautology: "helping people is good" for example) because not everyone values the same thing, which is precisely the point, its the underlying value statement or truth or falsity that causes the controversy

All that to say nothing, essentially.

Tell me, what is it that I say specifically that you deem "stupid"?

[Bertrand]

honestly its more useful to talk about you than to you

[squark]

What type are you?

LSI

[Retsu77]

its funny cause both these jokers probably hate feminism but their argument boils down to: "you just can't handle a strong independent woman!" except in this case its a male.. its like no, that's really not it

Ha ha ha. Feminism...

It's funny how I seem to only be drawing the ire of Fi leads here. Isn't that strange? And sure enough an Fi lead, INFj no less, is the one who brings the topic up. I swear, you can't make this stuff up.

[Retsu77]

honestly its more useful to talk about you than to you

Hmm, that's not very Christ-like.

[Bertrand]

Hmm, that's not very Christ-like.

what makes you think talking about you rather than to you communicates less effectively to you

in any case, I think this falls under the indirect communication of Kierkegaard, which is the most Christian thing there is

you should look into it

[Retsu77]

what makes you think talking about you rather than to you communicates less effectively to you

in any case, I think this falls under the indirect communication of Kierkegaard, which is the most Christian thing there is

you should look into it

I'm not sure what version of christianity you're following... Being passive aggressive is Christ-like? I don't think so. He directly confronted the religious leaders of his day. I'd worry more about emulating him than Kierkegaard.

I find it amusing how whine about my posts but can't even point out one thing I said that you felt was "stupid." Surely it shouldn't be difficult...

[Bertrand]

lol the bible is God literally making an example out of people



you're one of those people who throws a tantrum as soon as someone doesn't make them do something "why doesn't God come down and explain himself to me if he cares so much." you act like you love free will and you cry out for restraint. this is me showing you respect

[Retsu77]

lol the bible is God literally making an example out of people

Are you God now?

BTW, you never answered the question. Is this what Se PoLR looks like?

[Bertrand]

You said communicating about people was not christ like, I said that's precisely how God (Christ) operates, my response was not that me acting like God makes me God, rather that its consistent not inconsistent with Christ like behavior which was your initial objection

your logic is the logic of co-subordination, the logic of SEE

[Retsu77]

You said communicating about people was not christ like, I said that's precisely how God (christ) operates, my response was not that me acting like God makes me God, rather that its consistent not inconsistent with christ like behavior which was your initial objection

your logic is the logic of co-subordination, the logic of SEE

I said being passive aggressive was not Christ-like. I can quote the bible for you, if you like. BTW, an INFP/EII attempting to debate me with logic is laughable.

You were the same person that typed Cuv as ESE... Surprising you've yet to type me as the same. You appear to be the only person here making the feeler/ethical claim.

No wonder why some say your posts are nonsensical ramblings.

And you think the hebrew god was passive aggressive? lmao I think you need to read it again. That guy was anything but. He had some serious anger issues and seemed to being in the smiting business a little too frequent for your low-level passive aggressive jabs.

[Bertrand]

you're throwing a lot out there, maybe an ILI will come around and sort you out

[Retsu77]

you're one of those people who throws a tantrum as soon as someone doesn't make them do something "why doesn't God come down and explain himself to me if he cares so much." you act like you love free will and you cry out for restraint. this is me showing you respect

Did you forget to take your meds again...?

[Retsu77]

you're throwing a lot out there, maybe an ILI will come around and sort you out

Well, if Julius Caesar (ENTJ) is an SEE as many socionists say, I accept. SEE = ENTJ apparently.

[Retsu77]

LSI

Ok.

In the other thread, before it got closed, you mentioned SLE or LSE for my potential type. I found that interesting.

It seems, so far, we've got mostly logical types being chosen - with the odd SEE reference.

[Spermatozoa]

I said being passive aggressive was not Christ-like. I can quote the bible for you, if you like. BTW, an INFP/EII attempting to debate me with logic is laughable.

You were the same person that typed Cuv as ESE... Surprising you've yet to type me as the same. You appear to be the only person here making the feeler/ethical claim.

No wonder why some say your posts are nonsensical ramblings.

And you think the hebrew god was passive aggressive? lmao I think you need to read it again. That guy was anything but. He had some serious anger issues and seemed to being in the smiting business a little too frequent for your low-level passive aggressive jabs.

In fairness, I typed myself as SEE for a joke though I guess the joke could be on me all along - I might just be a depressed, bored SEE who craves some hot, demonically evil ILI to fuck some love juice into, again and again until she becomes my personal bitch. However I've also noticed that the women I find hot are apparently ESI-Se porn stars. I like their soft features and hungry, longing gazes. You can tell that they just want to be speared without mercy. But tactically, if I want to entice them down below, according to Socionics my best chance is to be an LIE-Ni.

I guess I could mind hack myself and try to become something else, but consider the other option of being SEE. Now that sucks when male, because your dual is ILI. The female variety is (1.) very rare which means I will be single for longer, and I absolutely hate being single. Also consider that let's say she and I meet and achieve optimal penetration. In this case I encounter problem (2.) which is that the ILI will just sit and lie there, talk in a monotonous tone and stare at me like a sexbot. But then, if I wanted a sexbot I would have already bought one; one that never nags me and never whines about BS. For the record you can now buy them online for $10K, so it's an increasingly attractive prospect and feminists are losing their shit over it.

Anyway you seem cool, not a feminist and therefore we have enough to start with. I feel like sometimes I come across as robotic, much colder and less friendly, less pleasurable than I am...maybe this is because a great deal of the time, people either discuss things without any joy or to a level of detail that just makes me restless. Without some energy and rough humor I am not easily engaged but yeah who the fuck cares, let's just get on with it. I do think you are LIE but honestly, I'm not in the mood for trying to explain here. Too much to do, too much to see.

Later oh and btw I promised someone that I'd say this today - Bertrand may you suck on a used dildo with passion.

[Retsu77]

In fairness, I typed myself as SEE for a joke though I guess the joke could be on me all along - I might just be a depressed, bored SEE who craves some hot, demonically evil ILI to fuck some love juice into, again and again until she becomes my personal bitch. However I've also noticed that the women I find hot are apparently ESI-Se porn stars. I like their soft features and hungry, longing gazes. You can tell that they just want to be speared without mercy. But tactically, if I want to entice them down below, according to Socionics my best chance is to be an LIE-Ni.

I guess I could mind hack myself and try to become something else, but consider the other option of being SEE. Now that sucks when male, because your dual is ILI. The female variety is (1.) very rare which means I will be single for longer, and I absolutely hate being single. Also consider that let's say she and I meet and achieve optimal penetration. In this case I encounter problem (2.) which is that the ILI will just sit and lie there, talk in a monotonous tone and stare at me like a sexbot. But then, if I wanted a sexbot I would have already bought one; one that never nags me and never whines about BS. For the record you can now buy them online for $10K, so it's an increasingly attractive prospect and feminists are losing their shit over it.

Anyway you seem cool, not a feminist and therefore we have enough to start with. I feel like sometimes I come across as robotic, much colder and less friendly, less pleasurable than I am...maybe this is because a great deal of the time, people either discuss things without any joy or to a level of detail that just makes me restless. Without some energy and rough humor I am not easily engaged but yeah who the fuck cares, let's just get on with it. I do think you are LIE but honestly, I'm not in the mood for trying to explain here. Too much to do, too much to see.

Later oh and btw I promised someone that I'd say this today - Bertrand may you suck on a used dildo with passion.

Man you need to make a video. I'm serious. We need to bask in the glory that is Cuivienen. Even if you don't post it here, I'd be interested in seeing it. Consider it, okay?

[Adam Strange]

In fairness, I typed myself as SEE for a joke though I guess the joke could be on me all along - I might just be a depressed, bored SEE who craves some hot, demonically evil ILI to fuck some love juice into, again and again until she becomes my personal bitch. However I've also noticed that the women I find hot are apparently ESI-Se porn stars. I like their soft features and hungry, longing gazes. You can tell that they just want to be speared without mercy. But tactically, if I want to entice them down below, according to Socionics my best chance is to be an LIE-Ni.

I guess I could mind hack myself and try to become something else, but consider the other option of being SEE. Now that sucks when male, because your dual is ILI. The female variety is (1.) very rare which means I will be single for longer, and I absolutely hate being single. Also consider that let's say she and I meet and achieve optimal penetration. In this case I encounter problem (2.) which is that the ILI will just sit and lie there, talk in a monotonous tone and stare at me like a sexbot. But then, if I wanted a sexbot I would have already bought one; one that never nags me and never whines about BS. For the record you can now buy them online for $10K, so it's an increasingly attractive prospect and feminists are losing their shit over it.

Anyway you seem cool, not a feminist and therefore we have enough to start with. I feel like sometimes I come across as robotic, much colder and less friendly, less pleasurable than I am...maybe this is because a great deal of the time, people either discuss things without any joy or to a level of detail that just makes me restless. Without some energy and rough humor I am not easily engaged but yeah who the fuck cares, let's just get on with it. I do think you are LIE but honestly, I'm not in the mood for trying to explain here. Too much to do, too much to see.

Later oh and btw I promised someone that I'd say this today - Bertrand may you suck on a used dildo with passion.

I have never thought you came across as robotic.

Instead, this reads like a soliloquy from Hamlet.
Similar cadence, too.
Pretty amazing, dude.

[Retsu77]

I have never thought you came across as robotic.

Instead, this reads like a soliloquy from Hamlet.
Similar cadence, too.
Pretty amazing, dude.

It's possible. I could see it, myself... potentially anyway.

EIE type 4 SX/SO perhaps for him?

[Retsu77]

I wonder if I could be ILE-Ti? DarkAngelFireWolf69 says this of them:

"Self-centred and pensive. Their ideas do not have direct connection with reality, for example philosophy, religion, bioenergetics etc. Their favourite occupation is comparing different logical systems. A type of office scientist. A very slim figure is characteristic for them."

[Number 9 large]

I wonder if I could be ILE-Ti? DarkAngelFireWolf69 says this of them:

"Self-centred and pensive. Their ideas do not have direct connection with reality, for example philosophy, religion, bioenergetics etc. Their favourite occupation is comparing different logical systems. A type of office scientist. A very slim figure is characteristic for them."

nigga pls
@Olimpia i summon thee

also'' Mrs. Buttersworth - today at 04:00 am
I just look at that and go, "What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?"''


feelsgoodman

[Retsu77]

nigga pls
@Olimpia i summon thee

also'' [COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]Mrs. Buttersworth - today at 04:00 am
I just look at that and go, "What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?"''

[/COLOR]feelsgoodman[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]
[/COLOR]

I liked your SLI 1 typing actually. It wasn't too bad...

[Number 9 large]

I liked your SLI 1 typing actually. It wasn't too bad...

hey.

shut up.

[Olimpia]

nigga pls
@Olimpia i summon thee

also'' Mrs. Buttersworth - today at 04:00 am
I just look at that and go, "What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?"''


feelsgoodman

Yeah he said that on discord (yes he called himself Mrs Buttersworth...) after seeing my Ti HA blog posts, haha.
lead/Ti ignoring af.

[Number 9 large]

I liked your SLI 1 typing actually. It wasn't too bad...

at least it was te ego mate, not ti

[Retsu77]

Yeah he said that after seeing my Ti HA blog posts, haha.
af.

You think Ti types care about your logic? Not necessarily. They just care about logic as THEY see it. Perhaps I just didn't care for YOUR logic there.

Ti is less concerned with objective truth than it cares about how it personally thinks things ought to be.

[Retsu77]

at least it was te ego mate, not ti

.
Functionally, ENTp is Ne + Te 4D.

[Number 9 large]

You think Ti types care about your logic? Not necessarily. They just care about logic as THEY see it. Perhaps I just didn't care for YOUR logic there.

Ti is less concerned with objective truth than it cares about how it personally thinks ought to be.

ti also doesnt give a fuck if a theory is related to reality or not, that includes "What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?"-useless philosophizing, especially as alpha nt mate.

[Number 9 large]

.
Functionally, ENTp is Ne + Te 4D.

yeah, but they dont use te except when they really really have to, ego is still Ne+Ti

an entp would never say ""What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?",as in the Te connotation of what u tried to say

[Retsu77]

ti also doesnt give a fuck if a theory is related to reality or not, that includes "What is the point of this? What can I use this for, if anything?"-useless philosophizing, especially as alpha nt mate.

I am also extraordinarily interested in religion, spirituality, metaphysics, astrology and a whole host of (mostly "bs") topics that don't directly relate to reality. Why do you think I ever typed as an "intuitive" in the first place? Even as a kid, I was obsessed with paranormal shit; ghosts, UFOs, mythology. So don't discount that possibility quite yet.

I still study typology, even though a lot of it is impractical.

[Number 9 large]

I am also extraordinarily interested in religion, spirituality, metaphysics, astrology and a whole host of (mostly "bs") topics that don't directly relate to reality.

Ni hidden agenda/seeking

as a kid, I was obsessed with paranormal shit; ghosts, UFOs, mythology. So don't discount that possibility quite yet.

Ne hidden agenda/seeking hahhaah get rekt son SLI type 1 confirmed gtfo

[Retsu77]

Ni hidden agenda/seeking


Ne hidden agenda/seeking hahhaah get rekt son SLI type 1 confirmed gtfo

Nice consistency for a Ti type. ^

[Retsu77]

I'm fine with being SLI in socionics actually. I mean, none of the descriptions fit - I HATE working with my hands or fixing shit, but ehh.

[Number 9 large]

I'm fine with being SLI in socionics actually. I mean, none of the descriptions fit - I HATE working with my hands or fixing shit, but ehh.

thats just a dumb stereotype

besides that statement is a pretty Si thing to say (si is all about like and dislike, and knowing it very well and acting accordingly)

[Retsu77]

thats just a dumb stereotype

besides that statement is a pretty Si thing to say (si is all about like and dislike, and knowing it very well and acting accordingly)

Actually, that's Fi but whatever.

You're free to type me as that. Not sure what socionics description of Si that ever equates having likes and dislikes with Si though. : /

[Number 9 large]

Actually, that's Fi but whatever.

You're free to type me as that. Not sure what socionics description of Si that ever equates having likes and dislikes with Si though. : /

like and dislike is Si (i mean liking and disliking stuff in general), relating to people and relations is Fi (yes they also have good liking and disliking of people, but it is of people only, with Si it is of mental/physical states as a whole)

Si people often ask themselves would I enjoy doing this, Te people ask themselves is it worth it, Ni people ask themselves does this have meaning, Ti people ask themselves does this make sense, Ne asks what are the possibilities?

Now go forth and choose wisely, my friend.