
Originally Posted by
Sol
VI in general sense is not about lookalikes. It's just a kind of information used for typing - visual information.
The only thing which fits to classical types theory in VI is nonverbal behavior.
As there are no good means to analyze such behavior by common thinking and words, you may do it by intuition.
So the only adequate VI is intuitive impressions from nonverbal behavior. So people of the same type may or may not be "lookalike" in appearance.
While lookalike <censored> leave for phisiognomy heretics.
Pat Healy - ISTJ(?)
Casey Neistat - some F clown