Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Correlation between the DCNH system and 2 subtype system

  1. #1
    Shytan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII 4w3 Sx/sp
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Correlation between the DCNH system and 2 subtype system

    I'm confused about the correlation between these two subtype systems. As a Creative subtype in DCNH (meaning accentuated Ne, Fe and Se ), I am ironically inclined toward the EIi-Fi description, which doesn't make sense. But then again, EII-Ne have strengthened Ne and weaker Fe and Se. EII-Fi have strengthened Fi as well as Fe and Se. I'm confused.

    C-EII-INFj 4w3 Sx/sp 479

  2. #2
    Seed my wickedness Sanguine Miasma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    7,563
    Mentioned
    321 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    2 subtype system:
    It looks like there are several ways to interpret this.

    Some say irrationality/rationality. Some say inert contact. Some say it depends what they produce.

    DarkAngelFireWolf69: He is outwardly extremely rational but bit too wishy washy in terms of his conclusions. He leaves contradictions behind him that are not important to him. Some say this is Ne but I'm not inclined to think so. I spot contradictions.
    -+ (like you) people are kind of nitpicky about this and will see those (different degrees).

    I sub typed myself based on descriptions.
    Last edited by Sanguine Miasma; 08-16-2017 at 05:34 PM.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.

  3. #3
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    3,787
    Mentioned
    283 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    People here might not know it but DCNH has a huge impact on compatibility. It's not just some theoretical construct. Almost every married couple is either D+N or C+H.

    So if you want to understand compatibility you need DCNH. That's just a fact of nature. So converting into 2-subtypes doesn't make sense. You need 4 subtypes.

    Descriptions can be used for subtyping, but ultimately it is about the connecting/ignoring and contact/distant dichotomies.
    Last edited by Tallmo; 08-17-2017 at 01:48 PM.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  4. #4
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,050
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nice, I've tried to explain this in my theory but I might have missed the Model G, is someone here willing to explain what Model G is about? In simple terms?

    @PurplePuff, what's with the + and - signs you put next to the functions? Is it resembling the theory explained in Hitta's thread on model B?

  5. #5
    Seed my wickedness Sanguine Miasma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    7,563
    Mentioned
    321 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Basically DCHN says that if you act like rational better to find complementary rational and same goes for irrational.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.

  6. #6
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,050
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @unsuccessfull Alphamale what's with the + and - signs you put next to the functions? Is it resembling the theory explained in Hitta's thread on model B?

  7. #7
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,050
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    No, it's a more complicated way to try and solve what Model B already did, which is Libido (energy). I had looked through it previously and was confused by how DarkAngelFireWolf69 could have missed such. In MBTI, the functional stacking shows what Model B shows, except it only shows the Libido flow. Model A did not include Libido, whereas MBTI did not include information. Model B reconciled the two into a single model. DarkAngelFireWolf69 is trying to holograph, that is, turn it inside out, Model A to see the opposite side presented by MBTI and how they connect. He's just trying to make Model B and doesn't realize it.
    Found this thread for Model G to be very useful. Model G(ulenko) is basically a more complex Model B... just to keep things simple ehhh lol

    I still miss to understand properly the Model B, if someone could formulate it better it would be much appreciated

  8. #8
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,050
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Viktor
    Yeah they don't contradict each other, if you have stronger Si you can't just be a contact SLE, same if you have stronger functions than the 4 found in the 1st and 4th blocks, then you're probably not the type you think you are.

  9. #9
    Seed my wickedness Sanguine Miasma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    7,563
    Mentioned
    321 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hybris theory View Post
    @unsuccessfull Alphamale what's with the + and - signs you put next to the functions? Is it resembling the theory explained in Hitta's thread on model B?
    It is different supervision and benefactor rings share same +/- not quadras. It follows that +/- comes only with two distinct flavours.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.

  10. #10
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,050
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I didnt understand a single thing but ty

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •