Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: BLOG: MANIFESTATIONS OF DICHOTOMY

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Spiritual Advisor Hope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    Celestial Sli
    Posts
    3,448
    Mentioned
    415 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default BLOG: MANIFESTATIONS OF DICHOTOMY


    MANIFESTATIONS OF DICHOTOMY: SENSORICS - INTUITION.


    What is sensorics and what is intuition?

    Sensorika is responsible for the person's perception of space, material objects of the surrounding world and specific concepts.

    Intuition is responsible for the perception of time, not the material objects of reality and abstract concepts.

    The term "intuition" has little to do with the usual meaning of this word, and does not include such meaning as a premonition.
    And, of course, the notion "not a material object" has nothing to do with ghosts, and other otherworldly entities.

    What does this mean?

    Sensorik is a person oriented to the perception of individual physical objects and their characteristics, such as they exist at the moment. What is the object at the moment.

    Intuity is a person focused on a large-scale perception of a group of objects or phenomena, and fixing changes in their qualities over time. What was or what will be the phenomenon.

    We can say that:


    Sensorik sees the picture as if close, close-up, at the distance of "outstretched hand". He sees trees that are currently: strong, rough, fragrant or dry and therefore need watering or grooming; But "does not see" the trees behind the trees.

    Inutit sees the picture as if from a distance, in the future. He sees the forest as an integral organism, the processes that take place in it.As a result, it can assess the coherence of these processes, and make some assumptions about how the forest was in the past; Or forecasts, where his paths will lead.
    Individual "trees" and their needs perceive worse. You can say - does not see the trees behind the forest.


    As a consequence:

    Sensorik
    in his reasoning goes from private to general. First collects the facts, then draws general conclusions.
    He prefers to work with factual material, based on known facts (facts that can be "touched").
    The new material is learned slowly, but in detail and remembers better.

    Intuition tries to immediately grasp the essence, to see the big picture. In his arguments, it comes from the general (from the essence) to the particular. But this does not always happen, but only in the case when it is necessary to somehow justify their conclusions for others. And since it is not so easy to dress "thought forms" in physical terms, it often happens that you can hear something like "by the head" from the intuition, "because it's so necessary".
    He prefers to work with theoretical material, learn new things, relying on forecasts.
    The material grasps "on the fly," it works effectively with large blocks of information, but also the perception is more superficial, the one learned more quickly is forgotten.

    Scope of "application":

    For sensorics - this is practice. Everyday, "routine" classes, requiring attention to detail. Where the intuition gets sour and bored, the sensor will sharpen its skills and professionalism. Therefore, the sensorics make the best masters, cooks, technical operators, musicians and dancers.
    The generation of something new for sensorics, in essence, boils down to a combination and recombination of facts already known to him.

    For an intuition is a theory. Generating everything new, global - the area of ​​his self-confidence. Therefore, the best researchers, technologists, composers and directors will get out of intuition.
    Attention of the intuition is directed to the future. The immediate needs of the surrounding world, as well as of one's own body, are realized badly. Therefore, applied professions that require constant attention are given to them more difficult.

    How is this dichotomy reflected in behavior?

    Sensorics will most likely seek to detail the information. Can ask concretizing questions, or make clarifying comments: "not much, but three." In the explanations often makes subject comparisons: "Blushed like a mother's coat". If this is an artist, then, most likely, will carefully draw the details.
    (Will try to "approximate" the picture)
    In everyday life, "imposes" their organization: how to cook food, how to clean, how to arrange furniture, what machine to buy. He has "smart" hands.
    Physiological needs are considered a natural manifestation. Perfectly aware of when he is hungry, when he is ill, comfortable or not.What he wants, or does not want.
    Careful in handling time. It is difficult to make predictions, or to calculate the time, which may be required for a new action.
    Without intuitive support, the sensor is difficult to "see" the direction in which you need to move, can act on luck. I do not feel the timeliness of starting an enterprise.

    Inutit will seek to generalize information. From him you can often hear "in general", "in fact." (She tries to "move away", that would see the picture as a whole). If this is an artist, then most likely he will not pay attention to detail, but draw in broad strokes or abstractly.
    "Imposes" its time schedule, or strategy of behavior. Now is the time to "forge iron", "prepare a sleigh", then it will be too late. Now is not the time to buy a car, they will soon fall in price, you have to buy a house - they "have a good harvest" this year.
    Time is a strong trait. It is usually quite accurate to guess how long this or that process can take. He sees well the possibilities and consequences. As a rule, it always has its own forecast concerning the event of interest to it.

    Physiological needs are worse. You may forget to eat, sit in an uncomfortable position, do not immediately realize that you are sick.Without sensory support in the home can "overgrow", save their obsolete things.

    You can say that the sensor knows "what and how," but does not know "where and when." Inutite, on the contrary, knows when and where to move, but does not know how.

    How is sensory - intuition in appearance?

    Sensor often looks more dense, and broad, "resistant." Movement conscious, confident.
    Extraverted sensorics looks more active, takes up a lot of space.
    Introverted - more passive, "compact" well feels its relevance.
    Sensor is well aware of shape, color, texture. The clothes on it fit, sits "as if poured." In it sensorics should be cozy and comfortable.

    Intuit more often looks more elongated in length, "unstable". Movements are cautious, as if "touching" the space, if the introver. An extrovert, on the contrary, is mobile, but the movements are not coordinated, because of what they can stumble upon surrounding objects, break them.
    It occupies little space in space, it can triple itself as a bird on a perch. Sometimes, in the territory that is required for one extrovert sensory can accommodate several intuitions at once. Especially it can be seen well in public transport.
    With clothes, as with the touch component of things are more complicated. It is more difficult for him to choose the size and the things that fit together. Because of what clothes on it can not sit well, warp. Especially if intuition is an extrovert. But this does not mean that intuition has no taste.
    Intuit can better feel the style. Its appearance carries more, a certain semantic load, than just a competent combination of color and form.

    And once again I will remind you that a person will not always act one-sidedly. Sensorik can also see the big picture, it just takes him more time. As well as intuition, if you wish, you can get used to the application of any complexity.



    Automatic translation from russian socionics Blog.
    Last edited by Hope; 08-24-2017 at 08:39 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •