Information Elements: Axes

[hellohellohello]

Ne/Si: The Object's Content and Its State

The potential energy, internal content and structure, and internal capabilities in objects and the relations between those objects occurring at the same time in space.

Ni/Se: Time and the Object's Form

The object's external and internal processes and situation in time and the object's kinetic energy and external qualities.

Fe/Ti: Internal Processes and Distance In Space

Internal processes (emotional experiences) that are hidden from view occurring in objects and the distance between those objects and position in space among other objects found within a hierarchy formed by law-bound relations in nature and society; i.e. an object's "needs."

Fi/Te: Attractive Force of Objects and External Movements

The "subjective distance" between objects and the object's movement in space, whether it is an event, fact, action, or change in position.

[Sol]

Another heretical nonsense from Gulenko? Partly based on fantasies of Augustinavichiute
If you give a citation or close to this, - give the link on the source, note about used sources.

> Ne/Si: The Object's Content and Its State
The potential energy, internal content and structure, and internal capabilities in objects and the relations between those objects occurring at the same time in space.

N - is an imagination. it can be about "potential energy, internal content and structure" or other. Ne is about imagined and objective, not only the said. about the same can be, as example, logical thoughts. perception of energy of a human (what is a kind of objects) has more relation to Fe, or can be evaluated by Ni.

"the relations between those objects occurring at the same time in space"
Si - is subjective physical evaluation of objective physical traits, which in some situation can be said to describe "relations between objects". relations of objects can be evaluated also by Ti (subjective logical interpretation), Fi (subjective emotional perception), Ni (subjective imaginary impressions), including when happening about traits of "the same time" and in near seen space.

Socionics is Jung's typology + IR. If some idea of Augustinavichiute contradicts to Jung's definitions(!) for functions, - it's wrong and hence not Socionics.
Use Jung's definitions for 4 functions and for e/i attitudes. Lesser mistakes will be.