thats not your motivation though thats just what happened
Lol this turned into an angsty thread
Last edited by Dioklecian; 07-31-2017 at 08:46 AM.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
.
C-EII-INFj 4w3 Sx/sp 479
Ok Dioklecian, type this person. This is the only material you'll get. I don't have any more pictures or videos of him. Good luck!
(picture removed)
Last edited by Tallmo; 08-23-2017 at 08:43 AM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
You reminded me of IEI but EII too@Cui
LSI? SLE? maybe ESI too. @Tallmo
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I have bias now as you know. Your other picture is how I imagine you to be most of the time. Your Fe is evident, as I would expect in a Fe lead. You don't monologue, instead you seem to listen and take in what others say and respond accordingly so people know you heard them. I think your self typing along with other things you talked about align with EIE in socionics. You also have some similarities to other self typed EIE sx firsts I have talked to, one on one, here and irl.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@Slugabed, @hybris theory, @Adam Strange
Dioklecian is so slow, he seems to be taking a break from the forum.
I will reveal the answer now. Drumrolllllll
Don't press before you guess
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Ben Whishaw, IEI
Attachment 11181
a bit Ed Sheeran, SEI?
Attachment 11182
Michael Holbrook Pennima, EIE
better known as MIKA (singer)
edit: slightly like @noaydi , EII
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...11619#post1634
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
My eyes/expression are very different to @noaydi (Beta vs Delta)
Thanks for all the examples you found though - the last one in particular, MIKA, is quite similar to me in speech and vibe.
Come on guys I need better photos for VI. It is not a guessing game.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.