Type's subjective experience

[tcaudilllg]

While working on my description of the providentiary's thought cycle I realized that similar statements could be made about any type. It seems to me that these statements can provide a window into a type's subjective experience. I've considered different orders of the lettering to indicate thought process fragments, with each letter representing a definite fragment of thought.

I: internal
N: pattern
T: causalty
J: choice

INTJ

Manifest Destination

"Given the internal state allowed by this pattern,
the choice of causes will be thus."

IJTN

Persuedent

"Given this internal state of choice,
causalty may influence patterns thusly."

ITNJ

Analyst

"Given these internal causes, the patterns of choice are thus."

JTIN

Guardian

"Given this choice of causes, these internal patterns are possible."

NTIJ

Chameleon

"Given the patterns shaped by these causes, internal states of
choice are thus."

NJTI

Reckoner

"Given this pattern of choice, the internal state of causalty is thus."

[UDP]

hmm....

[science as magic]

yes he did leave out 18 others and that is not counting oddball variations such as crosstypes or partial crosstypes (such as an I>NJ>T).

[tcaudilllg]

yes he did leave out 18 others and that is not counting oddball variations such as crosstypes or partial crosstypes (such as an I>NJ>T).

Huh?

[science as magic]

intj nitj tjni jnti
injt nijt tjin jnit
itnj ntji tijn jitn
itjn ntij tinj jint
ijnt njit tnji jtin
ijtn njti tnij jtni

4! = 24

If you vary the level of magnitude of each dimension so that they can be > < or = and superimposed upon one another then you have a significantly greater number of representations of the intj. When you try to represent the types functionally a similar explosion in the # of possible representations occurs.