-
I've commented on this elsewhere, but I actually really like where DarkAngelFireWolf69 is taking things because I think it makes things easier to understand why type X is X and not Y despite manifesting Y which people seem to have a really hard time sorting out according to classical socionics. I think its his desire to create a more "objective" socionics and the way to do that is to peg things to their manifestation as much as possible to cut down on things being lost in translation. I hope it turns out to be a masterwork and catches on because the idea seems really great. I think its the best shot we have at a real step forward in socionics as far as its Ti rendering goes
right now its like you have to be psychoanalytically minded to really, I believe, understand a lot of what's going on; and most people just aren't there
right now G is in sad shape though and needs a lot of work and polish and promotion so I don't blame anyone for not liking it as it stands. I know I like to stick to classical socionics simply because that's the framework everyone is at least trying to use
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules