-
nah, you're right. i can see how that'd come across as hostile (i shouldn't have used the word "bullshit", it was tactless of me)
i think i've just grown tired of people falling back on socionics as an excuse for being (or not being) weak/strong in a particular area, when it's clear that it's just being used as a tool to justify one's weaknesses, independent from socionics, rather a humble acknowledgement of one's weaknesses. i agree that "duality" isn't impervious to criticism, but neither are potentially misled perspectives. that post in particular didn't seem to hold relevance to socionics, it seemed more self-focused-projected-outwards, so my issue lied in the spreading of potentially inaccurate information. [wrt medusa's post, not yours]
i don't think you're beating a dead horse either. you're equally justified in clarifying your point of view as the rest of us are justified in clarifying our own. i agree that there needs to be a sense of tact present, otherwise nobody will listen to anybody and then we've got gundam 2.0 with, like, robots and stuff.
Last edited by wasp; 07-29-2017 at 06:03 PM.
Reason: omg my inner canuck is coming out
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules