I dunno if you're referring to my posts in this thread, but I wasn't trying to make LSE-EII duality sound impossible. It's just not as natural as OP seemed to be implying, IMO. I even specifically listed how I think it could work despite not being natural.
Generally EIIs don't argue for its own sake. We find it very stressful while some logical types don't notice there is an argument at all or even think it's a bonding experience. This is even more the case for EII 9s. I really lost it with the LSE I dated for a while cos I was sick of him starting petty arguments over nothing, but when I told him how stressful it was, he didn't think we had any arguments at all. My best LSE friend argued with me on typology a lot when I first brought it up with our friend group, which really stressed me out, but the next day, he said it was a good discussion.
But we'll defend what we think is the truth or what is right very stubbornly...



Reply With Quote