I can't believe how intellectual dishonest people are in order to try to defend their ideology.
Morality for action can not be derived out of distorted facts. If you want to behave in a truly ethical way you can not cling to false notions because you think those lies are good.
People want to do and be good but if they act on the basis of lies and ideology it will turn into shit for everybody involved. Upholding those kind of lies is highly amoral and you are not doing anyone a favor by trying to defend them.
But whatever, keep posting bullshit in order to give the impression that you had any arguments besides 'i have been told that i am a good guy when i say stuff like this. It is disgusting and will lead to a lot of horrific events.
But wow i am 'racist' for telling the truth, yes i love to commit heresy against your shit ideology that kills my loved ones.
As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods. They kill us for their sport.
Also of course due to external circumstances which foster a culture where being upstanding is not rewarded or being criminal is viewed as the most beneficial way to use what god gave you.
The thing is, most of this stuff is inherent, and you don't do anybody a favor when you try to ignore it until it gets better, because it will never get better fast enough for this to work out.
We would have to find a way as society to interact and act on these truths and to integrate this into our consciousness while still treating each-other with respect and compassion.
I'm not sure if we will ever be able to tackle this. But i think we will have to make a start by acknowledging simple truths and challenging ourselves to find new ways to deal with them, because how it goes right now, it will never work out.
Look, I'm not denigrating the important emotion you feel about the people you have personally cared about who were killed or raped. (though you are trying to argue that anyone who disagrees with you must be doing so based on peer pressure and not thinking, even though I did have two beautiful meta-analyses shared above that thoroughly debunk the racist IQ hypothesis).
I'm also not saying that young males are not responsible for most violent crime--because across cultures, they are. It's not inherently male. Boys are not demon spawn. Testosterone is used in nature in the female body. And testosterone, though incorrectly suspected for years as some Violence Juice has recently been debunked as an aggression potion. It makes you interested in social dynamics. But the violence? We raise boy chidren that way. Study after study notes it, from the way we talk about like equal weight babies in basinets, to the toys we buy them, to the depictions of boy actions in the majority of our media, to the over-representation in the military and police (after women were excluded for a century). We, alternatively, raise young women to master their own urges to violent action (we give them other tools like dialogue or pacifying people or ....urging men to violence). We reward and praise young men for violence. We set them up to endanger themselves and others when we do. And you're right that bringing young men into a country (young men of any race) can mean crime increases (when we keep raising them to 'protect by fighting'). And the reason the data you were looking at seems so convincing that the 'Browns and Blacks are more aggressive/demon spawn' is that MORE young males were seeking and getting refugee status which makes sense because if they stay in their origin countries they will be expected to participate in wars, etc., and so the refugees who are brown/black and being accepted into German society while largely nonviolent, are composed of an UNUSUALLY HIGH number of young males. 3 times as many of that young male demographic coming in as would otherwise on average come in if refugees of all ages and sexes came in in normal proportions. And we know young males on average commit way more violent crime. So there is likely to be a small increase in crime. And...while it's true with all these hundreds of thousands of people coming in legally after 2014 when there had been "6.1 million offences recorded by the police. By 2016, this had risen to 6.4 million - these figures include immigration violations which, inevitably, impact migrants." and
"Criminologists say the make-up of the new arrivals is an important factor.
In 2014, German men between the ages of 14 and 30 made up 9% of the population and were responsible for half of all the country's violent crimes.
When it comes to the new arrivals, men aged 16 to 30 made up 27% of all asylum-seekers who came in 2015.
"It is because of the demographics," claims Dr Dominic Kudlacek, from the Criminological Research Unit of Lower Saxony. "Whether they're asylum
seekers or EU migrants, they are younger than the average population and mostly male. Young men commit more crimes in every society."
But with all the sorrow and pain Germany experienced, the color isn't the issue. How can we tell? Well a very clear and quick refutal lies in the examination of this crime map (more crime in red) and THIS list of countries with unusually white populations. The whitest nations can have the highest crime. And...Ukraine and Canada (2 of the whitest in the world) have MUCH higher crime rates than Japan does, and there are almost no pasty ppl in Japan. France based on estimates is one of the whitest nations in the world and has crimes rates comparable with African nations, some of the most melanated.
SO YOU COULD BE ADVOCATING AGAINST RAPE AND MURDER AND STUDYING CAUSES in general which actually works, or...you could instead go after the Browns with no clear scientific support to do so besides wild leaps made irresponsibly over very basic and imprecise and non-nuanced science largely done on other species...and the ones done on people living in unequal by race human cities making it logically impossible to infer any inherent distinction. Your choice. But the heroic and protective work is the former, not the latter, and you're literally just re-enacting the pattern of young male aggression brainwashing if you choose the latter.
Last edited by nanashi; 05-31-2020 at 06:52 PM.
"Scientific racism, sometimes termed biological racism, is a pseudoscientific belief that empirical evidence exists to support or justify racism (racial discrimination),
racial inferiority, or racial superiority. Historically, scientific racism received credence throughout the scientific community, but it is no longer considered scientific."
Further your are arguing for my point, science (east) Asians are a lot less violent than white people and have lighter skin and a higher IQ.
That white countries where more criminal than black countries is just plain false.
Asian countries are the least violent, followed by white countries and slav countries, here you have to take into account the minorities present. Listing USA as a white country, saying it is the most violent while the 13 percent black people in the US commit more than 50 percent of the violent crime is ether dishonest are a weak attempt at lying to yourself.
your last post about the pigmentation of Asians is also wrong. It is not supported or mentioned by any of my studies and while there are darker Asians who will be on average more aggressive and less intelligent than lighter Asians this does not refute but align with what i said.
I just don't get people like you, there is absolutely no reason for this overwhelming amount of mental gymnastics you display while the answer is pretty clear.
Blacks are on average a more criminal and aggressive while being less intelligent than whites and it is a bad idea to let them in your country, no kind of mental gymnastics will change this and every kind of real life evidence and credible scientific evidence does support these claims.
Just stop lying to yourself and stop lying to everyone else just because you have been told that being a lyer equals being a good person, it's the other way around.
This will be the future of Germany as well. Angela Merkel will long be forgotten but the results of her incompetence will be long lasting.
Germany has a bleak future. Same scenario throughout Europe