Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
people procrastinate because of many reasons: fear of failure, fear of not being perfect, disliking the thing they're supposed to take care of, ect. Not every fucking thing is linked to socionics and socionics only; not only nature, but also nurture counts.
Regular procrastination "a lot" which you said about relates good to P, as J types prefer to hold the plans and it's not common for them. While the usage of "bad" words without good reasons points to not base Fi type, which are the most polite in the universe.
At best, as you got some anger from the argumentation about your type, this may relate to ESI - they do not like when people dig in their motivations and psyche to explain in them something. But they are J type, while there is more basis to think P in you.

> now I've got it handled pretty well, I think

your message was from not long ago times

> the lack of energy. When others hear about it, they tell me things like 'but taking your time to relax is important, too!', but it doesn't stop me from forgetting about it and not taking care of it anyway

J types plan the load to avoid the exhaustion.

> don't even think about suggesting that to me

hm... assertiveness in the talking. not what EII show

> Why do you use MBTI letters when - I suspect - talking about socionics?

MBT and Socionics are same Jung's typology. Preferences in MBT are correct and compatible with dichotomies in Socionics. Also MBT uses MBTI as major typing way, so from theory and practice points MBT types notation is compatible with Socionics. IEI = INFP, ESTJ = LSE. There are dichotomy tests in Socionics - they are identical to MBT tests.
There are many people which know good about MBT, but not about Socionics. MBT notations are more universal and help those people to accept Socionics, to see that it's same typology, just with wider theory, better described 8 functions, without the mistake for I types.

> Thank you, but I'm so sure of my type that I don't need to find any more reasons to support it.

Sometimes you may get doubts, with the noticing of more contradictions with EII version, like you got in this theme. Also I'm sure you do not have near a lot of people of any of 16 types, so to notice IR effects with some types could be interesting for you. Ne types have the interest to new, while your actions are protective here.

> I wouldn't be surprised, maaany people in the USA and other parts of the world have Polish ancestors.

In this case the opposite situation, - some people living in Poland may to have my Russian ancestor. Part of today Poland was the part of Russia in those times, so after revolutions seems he prefered to stay there. In Poland may live my 3rd cousins. I know that some Poles have same sirname like me, besides my name is universal Slavic one.

P.S. I'll let you to think about your type with the gotten arguments. It's not the typing theme, anyway. And seems you do not like to see the arguing against EII as your type.