What type is this person? v
What type is this person? v
Last edited by Desert Financial; 12-26-2018 at 02:47 AM.
SLE, of course.
That guy is not going to be happy in a few hours.
Sinfest_2000-07-23_Take_the_Pain_Away.gif
Yeah, some ST type.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
My mom is LSI and so/sp. My brother in law is SLI and they all used to mess around with each other while drinking beer, in a restaurant. At home she didn't pay much attention to the their boyish games. I have no doubts of their types since I did get a lot of feedback and have known them all a long time.
My point is that eating a hot pepper is really all we see here and he not even dramatic about like, say, Transkar was in his hot pepper video. I have seen so many videos of people eating hot peppers. They are not all the same types.![]()
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I can't see an SLI participating in this kind of test of courage. I've seen them challenge themselves to lift a certain amount of weight or lose some weight, but if you suggested eating super hot peppers for the hell of it, they would just give a little laugh, sit back down to rest and ignore you.
Indeed, that's why I begin to think SLE > LSE
... and Mike Rowe is actually reasonable in contrast to this noodle in the OP @passenger - it's all about proportion.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Sorry op for going off topic. I hope you are not the guy in the video, looking for a VI. lol Welcome to the 16types of crazy.![]()
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Impulsive, rash, thrill-seeking behavior without any thinking of the consequences or whether it might be a bad idea or bad for one's health -- has to be Se leading, more likely SLE. The idea that this behavior is at all characteristic of Delta STs is ridiculous (your family members do not count as proof).
I know you watched now and have considered other possibilities but I find it amusing that anyone thinks eating a hot pepper is some death defying feat or shows great courage. I have eaten very hot peppers. I hate them. I mean in your realm of possibilities do you see any way that an Si ego could do this because they can regulate the sensation better than others? I have many examples of this not involving hot peppers but it is pointless to discuss with people so stuck within the confines of theory that they dismiss real world experience.
I think what is comfortable or uncomfortable is relative... I prefer my food mild but some people love hot spicy things and specifically ask for their food to be hotter. If my family member is not proof that a SLI can enjoy experimenting with hot food so what. There is NO PROOF in socionics.
Its like half the forum have never interacted with actual human beings.![]()
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
lol, you said she was ILE before. She's not, she's Gamma SF. Which just goes to prove my point.
You seem to have completely missed my point about motivation.
If we're talking about real life experiences, I had an ILE friend who was into trying things like this. The motivations for this have more to do with Se and Ne potentially (seeking novelty and new experiences rather than intensity per se). So I could maybe see an LSE with mobilizing Ne and demonstrative Se doing it. The idea that it is merely "possible" is irrelevant -- we're talking about probabilities here. Motivations tell you what people are likely to do.
They may dismiss your real world experiences because they have no access to the people you're referring to and don't automatically assume that you have typed them correctly. This is entirely reasonable. (And no, I don't expect anyone to take the ILE example above as a fact either, it's just to show that my view is more nuanced than you are suggesting.)I have many examples of this not involving hot peppers but it is pointless to discuss with people so stuck within the confines of theory that they dismiss real world experience.
That's the thing, you don't know their motivation without asking. Some might have thought it was to show his courage to the younger boys. Maybe it was a male bonding experience. Maybe too much alcohol. Too many variables, when it comes to motivation, to say that an Si ego would not eat a hot pepper or even cliff dive. I personally would not cliff dive because my Si cringes at the idea of free falling. My ESE sister goes cliff diving and parasailing. No amount of Se would get me to do either. :/
Theoretically the person described below, dual or not, could get an SLI to try something "crazy"?
SLIs can tend towards an overly bland and conservative lifestyle. They often lack spontaneity and may exhibit the sentiment that something is missing and that little in their lives is novel and interesting. They appreciate people who exhibit a well-developed imagination, spontaneity, and new ideas. Such people often broaden the SLI's perspectives and give them a myriad of new experiences to draw upon. They are often recruited as willing collaborators into the constant unusual pursuits of IEEs.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
ok, I watched the video again. There is some Si language there, maybe LSE is plausible. It's a very short video so it's hard to say without more information.
Btw I don't think that doing stupid shit is necessarily type related. Actually I think INXjs are the least likely to do something that would cause them harm.
I mean generally ISTps are a pretty impulsive bunch. I think it's a bit silly to take the Si description of Socionics too far and say that Si egos would never do anything that would cause them discomfort.
Ummm.... Si ignoring or? (It's like when my SEE sister started to laugh at my dental issues as I was squirming about possible pain.)
I'm really averse to that stuff. Of course Si ego would have courage to experiment with their senses to find optimum area. This is just backwards.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
I would have thought SLIs as the rather impulsive daredevil types...
Btw:
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...ile_by_DarkAngelFireWolf69Originally Posted by SLI profile by DarkAngelFireWolf69
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...StratiyevskayaOriginally Posted by SLI by Stratiyevskaya
First of all, I didn't say that an Si ego type would not eat a hot pepper. But do SLIs (for example) spontaneously do painful or adrenaline-inducing things of their own accord? No. Like you say, your "Si cringes at the idea" of doing dangerous things.
It's generally absurd to say that you can't tell people's motivations from their actions (at least over the long term). Certain actions only have a few possible motivations (again, especially when someone does something completely unprompted and which isn't demanded by, or normal to the situation).
I'd rather not derail the thread but I can make an argument in the Youtube thread if you want.
I know you didn't say it like that but it was pretty much implied in some of the responses in this thread. I probably should have been more specific with you but the idea was still floating in my head. You believe that eating the hot pepper is a painful thing but I am willing to bet it is not painful to everyone. What one person considers pain another may consider pleasure.
My Si is devalued and it cringes at doing some things like free falling. I have done far more dangerous things than eating a hot pepper or cliff diving. In this thread people specifically said my IEI family members could eat the hot peppers due to devalued Si. I went on to tell them that an SLI was instigating. He was drunk at the time. I didn't want to get into the specifics but it does change things a bit to have that bit of knowledge? I have an aversion to some sensations. Burning my tongue is one of them. So 2 out of 3 IEI enjoyed the game. I am sure you could not guess the motivations just on the information I have given. I was also just comparing myself to an Si ego, my sister, who enjoys those rushes. She values Si.
You do realize that alcohol can lower inhibitions in any type? So it could also give courage where there was none before. I have no idea the type of person in video, ftr. I don't care either (sorry if it is actually you op). The SLE typing just seemed to be thrown out without any depth of thought.
What I really want to say is, people are way more complex than the theory. I am done with this, for now, since I am not gaining anything new, or enlightening, from it today.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung