I feel like it's doing a great disservice to people .. more or less indirectly insulting actually to type someone as a sensor just because they're more attractive/put together. Aushra even stated in the Dual Nature of Man that intuitives can often look more put together than sensors because they're afraid of looking out of place.:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...gustinaviciute

"All sensor is well understood for itself and others' physical needs. Able to assess your physical abilities and use them. That they are elegant, graceful movements openly attract the attention of a partner. Intuitive , at best, believe in what they say. And just as long as they say. Therefore, always afraid of becoming dependent on the speaker's compliments. How logical is not inclined to believe that he loved so intuitive constantly in doubt about whether that is attractive, handsome, fit. Touch is stylish to be noticed. Intuitive often more elegant, but only in order to not stand out, be less noticeable. He seems to hide behind its elegance."

This is not the best translation out there, but this is the article on this site. Anyway, you get the picture. Intuitives in my experience can be just as attractive and well-dressed, or more, than sensors. We have a truckload of beautiful intuitives here on this forum: @Chae @Adam Strange @Starfall @ScarlettLux @Vespertine @hacim .. this is by no means an exhaustive list. Judging by how attractive someone is, is no way to type.