I just checked. No one changed that particular phrase. The admin edit is in a completely different paragraph and has nothing to do with that sentence.
Which is why I wonder why you had to come up with all this crap and lie, basically for nothing.
Well, you've guessed it right. And as it turns out, you did lie. (Evidence is in the screenshot above) Why? Beats me.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Does any of this really matter? it was probably a shitload of work translating that strat article, and barely anyone has even thanked her for the effort. Its a wonder anyone who would actually like to contribute even comes back.
We're already stretched as it is. Good job Saphire.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
Normally I would chuckle and say “oops,” but with you acting like a strangely paranoid weirdo I feel inclined to explain the entire sequence of events: I altered that line, thought I changed it well but did not, politely responded to your douchebag-esque posts, checked the history and saw that a mod had made an edit, assumed it was to that line [which, bear in mind, I had changed albeit poorly], and responded to your lame accusation. I didn’t lie; I made a mistake. Now get off my back, Parkster.
I would just like to be the first person to say
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
Last edited by Park; 11-19-2009 at 04:23 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
.The most obvious thing that could give ISTps away is probably their obsession with pets. Sometimes it could reach ridiculous dimensions, turning ISTp's place into a zoo. This obsession is very closely connected with ISTp's hidden agenda. Since ISTps have unconscious need to be able to show their affection towards another, who could be a better suitable candidate for this than a pet, or better a dozen of them. People can reject your love and your good intentions, pets will never.
But here comes a twist. ISTps can often hurt the ones they love. Why would you want to do this? The one way to understand your feelings towards the loved ones is by hurting them and watching them suffer, only then you can be sure of how much you love them. Sounds cruel, but unfortunately this is the strange nature of this particular type of hidden agenda, which cannot be used as an excuse for such behaviour.
Do I want to like your cunt? No, but kudos on constructing such a bizzarely feminine, homoerotic response.
Yeah, based on the responses, this is pretty obvious to everyone who isn't Winterpark.
@Numbers, I hope you aren't truly serious with that quote. Even if that description weren't shitty and inaccurate, it still wouldn't apply to Parkster or change the fact that there is no purely socionics based excuse for being a rude, anal retentive prick.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I'm aware that you asked if I wanted to "lick" you, after I called you the cunt, rather than either of us suggesting you had one to lick. But I'm not sure what pointing this out does for you.
That's what I've been saying for a while now. Glad it's finally sinking in.
lol @ this thread
Thanks guys - I appreciate it And I'm glad this whole thing is clear to most people.