Post Interesting Psychology Articles

[Subteigh]

MBTI, If You Want Me Back, You Need to Change Too

[Adam Strange]

MBTI, If You Want Me Back, You Need to Change Too

@Subteigh, now you have me worried. That argument is pretty good.

[Subteigh]

@Subteigh, now you have me worried. That argument is pretty good.

[Adam Strange]

@Subteigh, I actually agree with the sentiments on the t-shirt, but maybe not for the reasons the author intended.

Yes, Finance is a parasite on the economy, and is eating it alive.

[Bethany]

https://amp.theguardian.com/science/...me-this-before she has a great Instagram account too

[Bethany]

https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/...-realistically

[Subteigh]

Völkel, S.T., Schoedel, R., Kaya, L. and Mayer, S., 2022. User Perceptions of Extraversion in Chatbots after Repeated Use. (direct link to pdf file)

[Socionics Is Not A Cult]

Chiroli, C., 2022. Simulation of emotional behaviour in a robot. (direct link to pdf file)

[Metaphor]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...nse-mechanisms

[Subteigh]

People Are Dating All Wrong, According to Data Science

[Astor]

People Are Dating All Wrong, According to Data Science

It’s because they aren’t using Socionics.

wow, just wow. we are so far ahead of these scientists here!

derp.

they really need to just get on board already….

[Subteigh]

Kennair, L.E.O., Wade, T.J., Tallaksen, M.T., Grøntvedt, T.V., Kessler, A.M., Burch, R.L. and Bendixen, M., 2022. Perceived Effectiveness of Flirtation Tactics: The Effects of sex, Mating Context and Individual Differences in US and Norwegian Samples. Evolutionary Psychology, 20(1), p.14747049221088011. (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Kerber, A., Roth, M. and Herzberg, P.Y., 2021. Personality types revisited–a literature-informed and data-driven approach to an integration of prototypical and dimensional constructs of personality description. PloS one, 16(1), p.e0244849.

Abstract

A new algorithmic approach to personality prototyping based on Big Five traits was applied to a large representative and longitudinal German dataset (N = 22,820) including behavior, personality and health correlates. We applied three different clustering techniques, latent profile analysis, the k-means method and spectral clustering algorithms. The resulting cluster centers, i.e. the personality prototypes, were evaluated using a large number of internal and external validity criteria including health, locus of control, self-esteem, impulsivity, risk-taking and wellbeing. The best-fitting prototypical personality profiles were labeled according to their Euclidean distances to averaged personality type profiles identified in a review of previous studies on personality types. This procedure yielded a five-cluster solution: resilient, overcontroller, undercontroller, reserved and vulnerable-resilient. Reliability and construct validity could be confirmed. We discuss wether personality types could comprise a bridge between personality and clinical psychology as well as between developmental psychology and resilience research.

[Socionics Is Not A Cult]

"it can be seen that the most extroverted participant performs a larger head displacement than the least extroverted one"

"we clearly observed that participants with higher Conscientiousness produce a smaller left knee displacement"

Delgado-Gómez, D., Masó-Besga, A.E., Aguado, D., Rubio, V.J., Sujar, A. and Bayona, S., 2022. Automatic Personality Assessment through Movement Analysis. Sensors, 22(10), p.3949. (direct link to pdf file)

Now we are getting somewhere.

[Subteigh]

Mottus, R, Wood, D, Condon, D, Back, MD, Baumert, A, Costantini, G, Epskamp, S, Greiff, S, Johnson, W, Lukaszewski, A, Murray, AL, Revelle, W, Wright, AGC, Yarkoni, T, Ziegler, M & Zimmermann, J 2020, 'Descriptive, predictive and explanatory personality research: Different goals, different approaches, but a shared need to move beyond the Big Few traits', European Journal of Personality, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1175-1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2311 (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Trull, T.J. and Widiger, T.A., 2022. Dimensional models of personality: the five-factor model and the DSM-5. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[Subteigh]

[Subteigh]

Table 2.1: Table showing Holland’s classification of academic majors

Ghimire, A., 2021. Data-Driven Recommendation of Academic Options Based on Personality Traits (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University). (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Sun, J., Neufeld, B., Snelgrove, P. and Vazire, S., 2022. Personality evaluated: What do people most like and dislike about themselves and their friends?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), p.731. (direct link to pdf file)

What do people think their best and worst personality traits are? Do their friends agree? Across three
samples, 463 college students (“targets”) and their friends freely described two traits they most liked and
two traits they most disliked about the target. Coders categorized these open-ended trait descriptors into
high or low poles of six trait domains (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stabil-
ity, openness, and honesty-humility) and judged whether targets and friends reported the same specific
best and worst traits. Best traits almost exclusively reflected high levels of the major trait domains (espe-
cially high agreeableness and extraversion). In contrast, although worst traits typically reflected low lev-
els of these traits (especially low emotional stability), they sometimes also revealed the downsides of
having high levels of these traits (e.g., high extraversion: “loud”; high agreeableness: “people-pleaser”).
Overall, targets and friends mentioned similar kinds of best traits; however, targets emphasized low emo-
tional stability worst traits more than friends did, whereas friends emphasized low prosociality worst
traits more than targets did. Targets and friends also showed a moderate amount of self–other agreement
on what the targets’ best and worst traits were. These results (a) shed light on the traits that people con-
sider to be most important in themselves and their friends, (b) suggest that the desirability of some traits
may be in the eye of the beholder, (c) reveal the mixed blessings of different traits, and, ultimately, (d)
provide a nuanced perspective on what it means for a trait to be “good” or “bad.”

[Metaphor]

MilgramOriginalWork.pdf

[Subteigh]

Vize, C., Sharpe, B.M., Miller, J., Lynam, D. and Soto, C.J., 2022. Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? Systematically testing the prevalence, nature, and effect size of trait by trait moderation. (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Hopwood, C.J., Stahlmann, A.G. and Bleidorn, W., 2022. Personality and Compassion for Animals. Anthrozoös, pp.1-13. (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Mõttus, R., 2021. Does a correlation say anything about an individual? A Trinomial Effect Size Display. (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]

Lillström Stenroos, K., 2022. How do we value others’ personality traits?: A Quantitative Study on Rating of Personality Traits Related to Introversion and Extraversion and How It Associates with Our Own Personality. (direct link to pdf file)

[Subteigh]