Removed
Removed
Last edited by Resonare; 03-12-2017 at 12:31 PM. Reason: Privacy
Gamma extrotim!! Ivanka vibes. SEE-Fi 3w2 sp/so?
Ah, and the guy. My feel says Fi is high... definitely intuitive. IEI sx/sp... probably a 9 or a 4, or both in the tritype.
SEI for the girl; guy can be EII.
She's pretty, but not my type, so not ESI. SEE seems very possible, SEI seems much less so. To me, SEI eyes have a "blank perfection" look to them. The woman in the picture looks like she is 100% engaged with looking at the camera, and that would point toward her being SEE.
I also agree that the guy is Fi-dom. Is that you?
SEE her
SLI him
I need side profile pictures
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed.
Last edited by Resonare; 03-12-2017 at 12:30 PM. Reason: Privacy
Not 100% sure, but it seems like they both could be ESI.
The guy could be LSI as an alternative type.
They both seem to be introverted to me.
Her smile isn't strong and radiant enough as it is typical for SEEs with 4D Fe.
SEEs have more power and in a way eloquence in their emotional expression, hers falls a bit more flat in a manner that reminds me of Fe Ignoring.
They are both stylish in this Se Creative/4D Si way. Simple cool style, well put together, low-key neutral colours for the most part.
The style of Se leads tends to either be more impactful and in your face (e.g bright colours) or more relaxed and laissez-faire, neither applies to them.
he looks like hes in the closet
she looks sp/so 9w8 (?)
She is gamma SF, probably ESI, and him... he seems IJ something and *maybe* intuitive.
Removed.
Last edited by Resonare; 03-12-2017 at 12:30 PM. Reason: Privacy
Ok, SEE makes sense for her : )
Yep. Compare her to Natalie Horler's antics, SeFi.
^^^^
I think ESE-Fe for her, LII-Ne for the guy
I have this rare ability to type by looking at someone's boobs.
You need to join @Adam Strange in his breast club
I told ya @Nate Chur, Adam got it down ^^^^^
No boobs. Tbh even posting her pics here is sort of crossing a line so I'll refrain from posting anymore and remove the ones I've already posted soon.
For what it's worth I originally typed her as SEE but she comes across as rational irl
When I look at her pics, there is something in my head that is telling me that something is off and I shouldn't work hard to get to know her better. Since I think that this is my duality filter talking, I'd say she is neither my dual nor any of the females that my lizard brain confuses with a dual. This eliminates ESI, LSI, SLI, SEI, and the occasional IEI. The way she looks in those "more expressive" pics makes me think of an IEE that I know (in that purple outfit pic, especially so. That pic is almost pure IEE.). The way she looks in the first pics makes me think she is a hot rational of some sort, but I don't know which type.
I think I'm leaning more toward IEE than SEE now.
I've been thinking she be LSE recently but it is confusing.
The guy is quite a lot like Adam Lallana irl, looks like him too...
Without being conceited it was the other way around. I saw her and that guy recently and just got to wondering...
Wild guess, ESE for her and Se polr for him.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'll bet money she's not LSE. Realistically, it would be hard to either win or lose that bet, but my mother, sister, and a bunch of my friends are LSE, and the woman in the pics above is lacking what I think of as a certain LSE blockiness (which I would describe as maybe stubborn, no-spontaneous-fun. "this is what we are going to do, no arguments from you" thing that LSE's have). Look at that pic of her in the purple jumper. She can turn it on, probably for the inert SLI's, and the tongue-out-in disgust seems Si to me.
Could you be mistaken for an SLI?
Yeah, LSE is a big stretch but I can rule out her being a type with strong Fe.
Dunno, you'll have to ask @Chae that one
Oh, and an important detail: I spotted Hello Kitty in a picture. A tell-tale sign!