Ethics... white or black, they seem vague to a certain point. A lot of different descriptions of introverted and extroverted ethics focus on their different aspects and it can be tricky to really make sense of what they are. Now, I want to make sure that my understanding of what
and
is correct.
Fe - emotion, mood, atmosphere, unstable, changeable, empathy, impact
Fi - feeling, standard, morality, stable, deep, sympathy, connection
In other words extroverted ethics are not grounded by deep internal moral strandards, I imagine the introverted ethics to be chained to an iron ball of morality and ethical values that won't let them go much further than where the chain ends, or if the person wants to go further it's painful and hard. Or let's say Fi feels the gravity of ethics firmly and stays with both feet on the ground.
While Fe doesn't have anything to keep it from floating in an open space, which means it can change its position wherever it goes. That sense of morality and standards is not their iron ball so their feeling and mood is completly dependable on what is going on right now in the given situation, moment and atmosphere. In other words Fe and Fi people both feel strongly and deeply but Fe is more dependable on what is going on in the enivorment in the given situation and is far more flexible and adaptable in that sense.
Is this right? Yes? No? Discuss...