This is the most stupid thread I have read here.
This is the most stupid thread I have read here.
I posted my sociotype so you can argue with it if you disagree.
You have clearly not read enough then. (http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-taking-a-shit)
But I guess this one would be higher up since it's as serious as it can be.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
Well you're rating the people that you have met so far, and generalized it. Not that you're rating a "type".
...
Which is pretty much what typology is in a nutshell.
Everyone I like here:
Most people here:
The rest here:
That was easy.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Aww you're being way too unfair to ESE-Si.
God I realize they are annoying housewife neurotic little shits but without them humanity would have starved a long time ago.
I think it's funny how ESE/ESFJs get so little appreciation on typology forums, but irl they are some of the most popular and well-loved people you see around
Easier to make fun of a type that is one of the least likely to see it and defend themselves.
My sister can see herself in some of the general descriptions of ESE but I don't think she would see herself in most of the personal accounts given by others since it is often about their own moms. She doesn't even want kids last I heard. She did teach her dogs proper behavior though. They don't jump, lick or bite people. They know how to wait. Very different from my EII sister's dogs who are the opposite and run right over her.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
That's what he did, though, and it didn't work. I've also tried that, and it didn't work. Let me try it again. @bgoo
EDIT: Oh, it works I guess. Can only the person who wrote the reply click on the hyperlink that results from mentioning somebody?
----- FarDraft, 2020
This is probably trueAww, this makes sense. The ESEs I've known are like these powerhouses of Fe, Se/Si, and even some Ne. Just surprisingly entertaining, energetic, and open-minded people. Usually they keep lots of nerdy fantasy interests. "Boring" or "rigid" are far from the first words I think of to describe them, even though that's often how the Myers Briggs people describe them.My sister can see herself in some of the general descriptions of ESE but I don't think she would see herself in most of the personal accounts given by others since it is often about their own moms. She doesn't even want kids last I heard. She did teach her dogs proper behavior though. They don't jump, lick or bite people. They know how to wait. Very different from my EII sister's dogs who are the opposite and run right over her.
^ the open parenthesis without a space before the @ broke the forum picking it up as a mention (we're talking about them mentioning Hag, right?)
@FarDraft
I've been up all day reading reddit, brain is fried, not sure what you're asking here.Can only the person who wrote the reply click on the hyperlink that results from mentioning somebody?
Yep, that was what I was asking. That was my initial thought, too, but I couldn't remember exactly why it didn't work for me before, and I assumed that it would have been too much of a coincidence that I tried to mention somebody right after another character as well. I guess not.
----- FarDraft, 2020
I'm not good at being objective, and this is how much i love them, i'm generally very subjective. but based on their work quality (even though value is subjective), their social skills, their ability and willingness to work, to relax, their intellect, their endurance, how independent they were, how much they were both willing to help and actually helped me, their originality, how much moral support (especially effective) and insight they gave me without taking it back, their appearance (features my preference), how good their physifcal presence feels to me, when i wanted to left alone how much they left me alone, their voices i'll tell you and i can get along with just about anyone:
ILE-Ti: 8.75
ILE-Ne: 3
ESE-Fe: 3.75
ESE-Si: 4
SEI-Si: 5.5
SEI-Fe: 4
LII-Ti: 1.5
LII-Ne: 6
EIE-Fe: 5
EIE-Ni: 5
SLE-Se: 6.25
SLE-Ti: 8.75
LSI-Ti: 4.75
LSI-Se: 9
IEI-Fe: 7
IEI-Ni: 8
SEE-Se: 7.5
SEE-Fi: 7.5
LIE-Ni: 7.75
LIE-Te: 7.75
ESI-Fi: 6.5
ESI-Se: 7
ILI-Ni: 7.5
ILI-Te: 8.5
LSE-Te: 7
LSE-Si: 7
IEE-Ne: 5
IEE-Fi: 5
EII-Fi: 4.5
EII-Ne: 6
Last edited by Disturbed; 04-06-2024 at 12:39 PM.
I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.
ILE-Ne - 4
ILE-Ti -
ESE-Fe - 6
ESE-Si - 6
LII-Ti - 4
LII-Ne - 5
SEI-Si - 6
SEI-Fe - 4
SLE-Se -
SLE-Ti -
EIE-Fe - 6
EIE-Ni - 6
LSI-Ti -
LSI-Se -
IEI-Ni - 5
IEI-Fe - 5
SEE-Se - 2
SEE-Fi - 3
LIE-Te - 7
LIE-Ni - 7
ILI-Ni - 6
ILI-Te - 6
ESI-Fi - 5
ESI-Se -
IEE-Ne - 4
IEE-Fi -
LSE-Te - 5
LSE-Si -
SLI-Si - 7
SLI-Te -
EII-Fi - 7
EII-Ne -