Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
I feel like wanting to reproduce an enjoyable moment is mostly Si and it gets muddled by the source being "emotional" which brings in Fe in the form of "production" and Fi in the form of "subjective sense-feeling", you could even say Te or Ti depending on how they approached it (reproduction and "aesthetic" appreciation), and a splash of intuition to add conceptual depth. in essence its a complex phenomenon that is going to be weighted by the personality in question. some people will privilege some modes more than others, but on the whole its anchored in Si
I can't agree with that. I would say it's anchored in ethics, but Si is blocked with Fe for a reason. Music only improves the quality of your experience because it affects your emotional state (which is what Alomoes is describing here).

It has nothing to do with Te or Ti.

I think if they really thought about it its more about the sensation than the emotion... its how people can enjoy being sad, its a pleasant sensation attached to negative affect. if you reproduced purely the emotion without the accompanying sensation it would be purely negative.. its why people prefer music to being kicked in the balls (there are exceptions of course, but you get the idea... perhaps a better way to put it would be music to being told your beloved grandma just died)...
This proves the exact opposite to me: Fe with Ni/Se means going through possibly negative or intense but also cathartic and valuable emotional experiences, which is exactly what some music does.

in this way I see music as primarily a Se way to produce introverted sensations, which are grounded mainly in Fi from the producer, but then you get shit like math rock or weird al so that can vary (Ti/Ne "music")

national anthems and shit like that seems like "Fe music", maybe some kinds of church songs, etc