it sounds really beta to me, in that you've defined freedom as doing what the group wants and "regulation" as not being able to essentially lie in order to promote a jocular atmosphere. the ti construction of this, while consistent with its definitions strikes me as kind of absurd, because its usually the ringleaders that define and control whatever the group wants anyway, thus the whole thing just comes off as a transparent attempt to justify beta domination via groupthink and emotional pressure. extra points for invoking notions of "love" and "organic" as if the universe itself appointed NFJs its masters
the funny thing is, as soon as there are two popes suddenly there's war. so all this moralizing rings false because beta can't even get along with itself. so much for freedom and love



Reply With Quote