Please help me type this person from a description

[Aster]

.

[Adam Strange]

Sounds like Jack London.
Nevertheless, I see parts of LIE, ILI, SLE, and LSE.

P.S.
The more I think about it, the more I think LIE-Ni.

Ni because of the Bible stuff and conspiracy theories, although that could be Delta, too. Could also be ILI-Te.

[Chae]

I see LIE as well.

[Singu]

Sounds like EXTj... Not sure if there's Si PoLR or not.

[darya]

I get more of an impression of LII or LSI.

[darya]

Last time I described him on a different site some one said LSI as well. I've considered that one as well. But he's not as 'organized' as I would think an LSI would be....

I don't know about LII. A lot of people find him intimidating or say he 'scares the shit out of them'. I don't know if an LII would come off that way to so many people?

Interesting. If he's intimidating in a physical presence way then he's probably unlikely to be LII. Although he's messy he still sounds high strung to be irrational, so not sure about Te-creative. But that's still likelier than LIE imo. Dunno, LSI 6w5?

[Exodus]

I would say SLE, LIE is less likely IMO. The main theme is impatience and getting stuff done, Se >> Si. LIEs tend to pay a lot of attention to planning their future also.

[Adam Strange]

From the pics, I'd say LSE. I can't see any other type for him, based on those pictures.

LSE also makes sense from the facts that he works all the time, but can't see very far forward (college choice of majors). LSE's are also good at perfecting things (Ne) and making money (Te).

The ones I've known tend to work hard when they work, and then take time off to do hunting or fishing or whatever, outside.

Delta's also tend to be conspiracy theorists, and they like things to be normal and predictable, so don't act Weird around them. Weird = Deviant. LSE's can also have great (conservative) taste in clothes (if you like that sort of thing).

Yep, I'd bet money that he's LSE.

I can't believe I didn't see that from your description. It was all there.
Ask him if he likes the James Bond movies. Those were designed for LSE's.

[Iwantpeace]

LSI maybe SLE but the hoarding things and not throwing them away is sometimes mobilizing Ni. LSI I know are secret hoarders especially with electronics and technology stuff and they say "I might need this one day"....I think it's the weak Ni vulnerable Ne. They get a bit neurotic with the vulnerable function and potentials.

Also LSI and sometimes SLE love to take things apart to improve them or figure out how the work they are natural mechanics. It's that Ti Se combo. LSI especially are natural engineers quite a few go into dentistry because they find the body interesting in theory but hate dealing with people.

in the last photo the way he is standing is very dominant Se + Ti.

this is a common SLE thing:

"He's not very social but is pretty good at socializing when he is in social situations. He claims this is because he is good at 'bullshitting with people'. "

Beta Se know how to smoose when they want something. LSIs can be better than me socializing as they get hierarchy and games better.

[Exodus]

Not a big fan of VI but the pics do confirm the image of him as a physical and threatening kind of person.

[The Exception]

My guess is LSE but I wouldn't rule out SLE or even LIE. Quasi-identicals can sometimes be difficult to tell apart for me, especially LSE vs. SLE. In this questionnaire it seems more apparent what the strong functions are than the quadra.


Strong Te is apparent, so is strong Se, although mobilizing Se would be possible, but most likely lead or demonstrative. All three of these types place a high importance on getting things done.

Also I think LIE is less likely because Ni does seem weak overall. Impatient, poor time management, not very punctual. Seems more in the moment, do it now rather than thinking about future trends and where things are headed.

My guess is LSE because some things hinted at delta ST like some of his hobbies- taking things apart and putting them together again, nature pictures, cares alot about the quality and care of physical objects, fussy about the overall quality of work, tastes are mostly practical and conservative.

Seems more rational than irrational type overall but has some irrational tendencies.

[Jake]

I would guess SLI or LSE. I'm picking up on Fe-vulnerable rather than Ni-vulnerable.

Is this your boyfriend/husband?

[Beautiful sky]

SEE perceives Se

[Jake]

I thought Fe PoLR for a while too at first, but IP temperament is not really like him. He thinks he's more EJ like...but he says he's an introvert.




Well you let the cat of the bag. lol. Yes, it is. It's ok, though. I was going to say eventually. I figured some might figure it out on their own anyway. I've mentioned what I thought his type was on here so I didn't say at first for unbiased opinions.

Haha aww. Well I hope I didn’t spoil anything :x


I would rely on Model A & the Information Elements first then everything else should just fall into place

[Muddy]

I'm imagining Big Foster Farrell from the show Outsiders. Look him up and see if he resembles the person you are describing.

I'm very familiar with this kind of person, I would say SLE most definitely. Aggression, hyper activity and desire to control things seem to be the things that most stand out most. I can see why people would think LIE or LSE due to the Te, but I think motivation for this person is more about a urgent desire to do shit rather then doing things because he really needs to. LIEs have weak Se and are not this confident telling people off and bossing them around, LSEs value Si and wouldn't seek to control people in such an aggressive manner.

[Beautiful sky]

Haha aww. Well I hope I didn’t spoil anything :x


I would rely on Model A & the Information Elements first then everything else should just fall into place

I agree with the aggressive part as it relates to Se "Force (F) is perception of physical objects and the amount of space they take up in the real world, the impact something has on its environment and the threat it poses to other objects. F is geared towards action and decides immediately on quick assessments of superficial, concrete data, making the approach direct and imbued with a harsh determination. In this sense, it is the opposite of Ideas. F approaches reality in terms of the clash of opposing forces, winning over weaker opponents and looking to push a situation to their advantage, even if that requires an intense struggle. In this sense, it is the inverse of Senses."

But it's also mobilizing. One SEE that I knows how to use her benevolence and kindness to get her way. For example they may forget to shut off a hazardous electronic device and when called out for it will say "oh no I'm so sorry" then will pretend to affix or appeal to a system that they will show to others that will fix the problem but won't stick to the system like "I'll get a timer or an alarm next time to help me recognize when to turn it off" the manipulation is that they know they won't stick to it but they act on quick assessment of concrete data "if I don't make a concrete change like getting an alarm they will think that I'm not responsible and will fire me" all the tools of what others expect and find fitting is available to Se because they deal with concrete objects like tools and people

[Jake]

I agree with the aggressive part as it relates to Se "Force (F) is perception of physical objects and the amount of space they take up in the real world, the impact something has on its environment and the threat it poses to other objects. F is geared towards action and decides immediately on quick assessments of superficial, concrete data, making the approach direct and imbued with a harsh determination. In this sense, it is the opposite of Ideas. F approaches reality in terms of the clash of opposing forces, winning over weaker opponents and looking to push a situation to their advantage, even if that requires an intense struggle. In this sense, it is the inverse of Senses."

But it's also mobilizing. One SEE that I knows how to use her benevolence and kindness to get her way. For example they may forget to shut off a hazardous electronic device and when called out for it will say "oh no I'm so sorry" then will pretend to affix or appeal to a system that they will show to others that will fix the problem but won't stick to the system like "I'll get a timer or an alarm next time to help me recognize when to turn it off" the manipulation is that they know they won't stick to it but they act on quick assessment of concrete data "if I don't make a concrete change like getting an alarm they will think that I'm not responsible and will fire me" all the tools of what others expect and find fitting is available to Se because they deal with concrete objects like tools and people

I agree, but I don't think Blue described him as aggressive, right?

[Beautiful sky]

Thank you for your input, but why do you think an ethical type? Like if I ask him why he does or doesn't like something, it's a logical answer instead of based on ethical reasoning.

Because it seem like he can judge interpersonal distance well when he is around people and not engaging in his hobbies

Being dissatisfied of people because they aren't what they seemed or critical because they don't meet expectations isn't outside of Fi if anything it's observing people and relationships

"not very social but is pretty good at socializing when he is in social situations. He claims this is because he is good at 'bullshitting with people'. "

[Beautiful sky]

Hmm.. He seems kind of insecure to me in knowing how people feel about him. He seems to need a lot of reassurance.



I wouldn't say he gets dissatisfied over people not being what they seemed. He seems to know what to expect out of people. It's more like he doesn't like when people are being lazy on the job, like talking on the phone when they are supposed to be working, like the quality of work they are going to do. It's not really a personal judgement. He told me he doesn't believe in judging people and that judging is wrong.


Why is this ethical only necessarily?

In Se types ordering people around to feel superior counteracts insecurities and poor self image. Bossing people around makes them feel knowledgeable and self important. If anyone reacts to them their personal sentiments (Fi) becomes impacted. They begin to react with hostility and offense. The common signs are being accusatory, judgemental, insecure, and defensive. It's like dishing out but can't take the return. Still that is all out of how Fi conditions Se.

He's pretty much trying to say how he feels about these people and about their actions