I highly doubt you are rational - either SLE or SLI (probably the former).
Well, my first impression was based on your energy level and "distribution" that reminded me of Ij opposed to Ep, on your communication style that is rather "Cold-blooded", and simply on my recollection of LSIs I have come across and how they act, and you fit that better than SLEs I have seen. (Here is an example of an SLE I have recently come across on YT. See the difference?)
Based on your behaviour, I find Fe seeking more likely than Fe HA. Or in other words, 1D Fe seems to fit better. A lot of SLEs actively try to be engaging or humorous in their +Fe HA kind of way. To be honest, on my VERY first impression all I got was ISTx. For a few seconds, I wondered about whether you were SLI or LSI. But afterwards, what you said was rather Beta Quadra (Se, Fe valuing) and so forth, and you didn't made Te statements as an SLI with Te Creative would.
I am assuming that many people type you as SLE because a lot of people don't come across Beta STs on here, and are sensitive towards that in a way.
So, when they see a guy who is fairly masculine and Beta ST (and likely Se subtype), they are quick to assume SLE.
To give a more detailed explanation, I'd have to pick apart your statements in the video, or better pick apart your statements from a typing questionnaire.
However, I don't really feel like doing that. I used to do that more often for free in the past, but now I only do that when people personally request it from me, etc.
Yes, cedarsprings.
Weak Fe but I don't think it's valued. I think there's more of a focus on Fi. There's also your focus on independence and free-thinking mentality which led me to think strong Ti. So Ti is in your mental block somewhere (Functions 1,
2, 7, & 8). This leaves LIE, ILI, LSE, or SLI. Reading what you've said to a couple of other people on this post, you seem to have a good handle on Se, but you only use it when necessary. Which led me to think Se is also in your mental block; which leaves LSE or SLI. Your free-thinking mentality doesn't seem to be in the ignoring position, instead you would've just focused on the facts and appreciated individuals who stick close to what is known to be true at all times and places. This left me to conclude with SLI.
Yes WSS does have 'professionals' (not DarkAngelFireWolf69 or anyone like that, but still really good typers & extremely knowledgeable) type you.
I agree with @Cassandra on the points of you having not displayed any Fe HA so far, both in the video (the part I watched anyway) and here in your type thread (seemed more 1D Fe-ish the way you engaged with @Aylen) or other posts of yours that I've seem.
Your complaint here on not having the stable social life could also be Fe seeking. See also about how Fe suggestive differs from Fe mobilizing here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...Dmitry-Golihov - these descriptions show very well how essentially the suggestive function is what determines what place we are seeking where the suggestive is ensured to be in a good condition, while mobilizing can deal with issues with a bit more autonomy.
As for Se, I have more of a conscious focus on Se myself. Supposedly that's a Creative/Contact subtype thing with the strengthened focus on Se.
I didn't look at that video of the supposed SLE but, assuming he's really SLE, observe the Fe usage of his. Relate or not?
Communication styles: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ication-styles
Why do you think Fe is not valued?
Mental block is not functions 1, 2, 7, 8 but 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Oh woops, I just meant the Base, Creative, Ignoring & Demonstrative.
As far as Fe valuing vs. Fi valuing:
Viktor showed an emphasis on stability and reliability of relationships with friends and family and prioritising people based on judgment of the individuals themselves. This is all opposed to striving for emotional experiences and showing their passions and moods and treating others as a collective.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Joke aside. I'm not schooled in the socionics system, like at all. For what it's worth, from an myers-briggs perspective you seem ISTP.
What do you think of the country that you live in, Sweden?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Consistency is more of an L-based trait.
I mean being open/closed to people who the individual feels close to. 'Psychological distance', in other words.
For instance, I'll be closed off to someone I deem as untrustworthy even if somebody I'm close to says that in fact they are trustworthy. Basically only because I feel they are untrustworthy and the subjective evaluation holds the highest priority in my mind.
Same thing to me as the "stability and reliability". All that's based on consistency. Call it Ti with Si demo, whatever.
I have enough autonomy for my Ti/Fi to be able to make such judgments myself. What makes this specifically Fi valuing for @Viktor?I mean being open/closed to people who the individual feels close to. 'Psychological distance', in other words.
For instance, I'll be closed off to someone I deem as untrustworthy even if somebody I'm close to says that in fact they are trustworthy. Basically only because I feel they are untrustworthy and the subjective evaluation holds the highest priority in my mind.
Just to add something on the introvert vs extravert issue in general, I judge this by seeing what role the person takes in duality interactions - this can be seen with other people too, but easiest to see here, just it requires analyzing out if the interaction itself is duality, also easy enough to see with other people who are the same on I/E as the dual. If playing the receptive role more then an introvert, if playing the active initiative taking role more, an extravert. What also may complicate this is strong Creative functions, an introvert can be initiative taking in that area, and an extravert more passive in that area. But overall there should be a good visible trend even for such ambiverts.
With your questions, I would say that I feel normal, ok around people, if I can focus on a task I'm working on. Fun events can also be good, if there is enough "nonverbal" stuff going on and not too much talking. Not drained in these cases then. I would feel fine if I spent a week by myself but after some days I might notice here and there for a second that I'm emotionally a tiny bit more flat than my optimal state. It's hard to get aware of this fully for a long enough time, though. Would you see me as an introvert or extravert based on that... I see that as just Fe seeking.
Lol, Fe seeking isn't about going along with a group because of feeling lonely.
Anyway, where you say you would have to schedule your life after them all the time, I don't get what you mean by that. Do you feel a compulsion to go out with them whenever they ask or wtf?
Did you read the links btw? Any good?
Heh that does sound 4D Te there. My fantasies are slightly different, so to speak.Openly opinionated feelers are pretty attractive to me, yah, I can understand if you look more for IxFx than ExFx.
This does sound like Ti creative af. The way you talk here, you remind me of an SLE-Ti guy.I can relate to the Ti creative description, because I like to explain things. I actually had a youtube channel where I compared MBTI types. I wasn't even that good at it, I just like to explain things because saying it out loud helps me to understand it myself. My LII friend makes fun of me for making really simplified explanations of things, I'm a bit of a "captain obvious". I will teach people things they already know, and I will make the same points over and over again until I get a response from them that shows that they get what I'm saying. So Ti creative is totally me, even the part about learning about unexplored areas and being the first to explore an idea. That's why I like jungian typology because it's pretty vague and I feel like I can make up my own rules for typing, because very few people take it seriously anyways. I'm also a bit of a trend setter with my friends, often I will discover something and tell the LII and ILI about it, and then they'll surpass me in nerdiness about it and forget that I stared with it. Most of our common interests are things that I like.
Guess it was just you being initially reserved then.As for Fe HA, I agree that it is less pronounced in my personality, but it definitely works for me, I can relate to it. Especially the part about recognition and honor. As a child and teenager I used to have sport medals all over my wall, it's important that people know about my acheivements, I brag a lot. I love flattery, please tell me about how great I am haha. Also the part about being liked, again with the fight with my friend, the leader of the group didn't respect me which was enough for me to leave the group completely. I absolutely hate to be ignored or looked down upon, I can't deal with it
Very last parts (group stuff including fight, not letting myself be ignored) I relate to too, maybe general Se ego stuff, I dunno.
Well that alone might rule out SLI.
What your last sentence suggests to me is that you've never actually spent a week alone before because you used the word "if" (hypotheticals). Unless you have?
SLI have a tendency to hermit in their homes and maybe socialize sporadically.
Then again there are always exceptions and differences.
Last edited by wacey; 02-05-2017 at 11:39 PM.
I have a close confirmed SLE friend who is a very accurate sociotyper. I will run your video by her next time we skype and get her opinion for you. She is super trust worthy for this kind of thing.
(Btw Nordic people are wicked. Love your cultures. People in Canada share many of the same values because we are also close to nature)
Fun SLE stuff. (Btw for subtype, SLE-Ti, not SLE-Se, IMO.)
I don't get anxious myself if I was just to sit down like that, I just get very bored soon unless I do have something to think out for some practical issue. Usually nah I "think it out" on the move. With being in the car for that long... I'd just watch the road and the moving scene details. Zero thoughts for the most part.
I would type Sweden as EII... and I think Canada is also typed as EII, but it could also be SEI.