LOL oh no my dual is probably the most famous chess player in western history. Somehow... that option doesn’t surprise me. I am able to briefly analyze chess moves (I’m not good, just know some plays mechanics) but it’s from straight deductions. I don’t know about Magnus but I find him totally boring and dry and don’t care for his play style at all. I don’t understand why he would choose a move over another but Fischer, I can understand. I can understand the history of chess moves from various players but I just don’t get Magnus. He could be normalizing subtype or any subtype for all I care, all I know is his logic is what I can’t figure out.
My question is, who would win if there’s a match of Magnus vs Fischer?