Finished Typing For LuckyOne

[Chae]

@LuckyOne Just signed up, here it is!! This was awesome. I came up with a new method so I had to do it manually & scan it, hope you understand what's going on there So, the result fluctuated but now it is set:

---> Your type is ILI.

I assigned valued functions to each sentence/block. Green parts are strong Ni or ILI impressions in general, pink parts are Fe PoLR. As I did in the typing thread of lungs, the more transfer, the less valued the IE.
If you want more feedback say the word, but the scans explain a lot already. All the love

EDIT: sorry for that, the order of the pages changed through uploading

[LuckyOne]

@LuckyOne Just signed up, here it is!! This was awesome. I came up with a new method so I had to do it manually & scan it, hope you understand what's going on there So, the result fluctuated but now it is set:

---> Your type is ILI.

I assigned valued functions to each sentence/block. Green parts are strong Ni or ILI impressions in general, pink parts are Fe PoLR. As I did in the typing thread of lungs, the more transfer, the less valued the IE.
If you want more feedback say the word, but the scans explain a lot already. All the love

EDIT: sorry for that, the order of the pages changed through uploading

Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this, I'd never expected you to. To go all this work to help me...I appreciate it so so much

Now onto the typing itself:

The scans don't explain anything. I have zero idea of why you attributed a lot of the answers to the functions you pointed out. Why would this be indicative of Ni, for example?

What is coziness?
Feeling like you could stay there forever.

Is it because I used the word "forever", which is indicative of time? Because it makes no sense to me.

Or this (again, where's the Ni?):

How do others evaluate your skill in doing so? Do you agree with them?
I don’t do it for others. But they do it for me, I don’t even have to ask, it’s funny.

So having people do nice things for me without asking is indicative of Ni? How?

Again, what's Ni about this answer?:

Why do people go to work?
Mostly because they have no choice but. Others are lucky and do it for their personal enjoyment and fulfillment.

If anything, it'd be Fi.


I picked only the only ones I found more baffling, but really, this came out of the left field. When I first posted the questionnaire, this is what you said about it:

Yes, definitely aggressor. And Beta, very hierarchical (---> aristocracy) while instinctual. Territorial, straightforward, sensory over intuition (especially Ne, Ni is critically valued) - SLE is my verdict.
e8 is also correct, reading between the lines there's a huge defense mechanism. Which expresses itself as anger on the surface. Mhm, Sx/Sp although you do sound contraflow - essentially, you are compelled towards the status of being human, but the Beta drive to "go against" obscures the instinct expression.

Then this:

Hm... my reasoning so far, also drawing from our interactions: extrotim, emphasis on Se, Fe, Fi. Irrational over rational imo, so I'd go with Ep and not Ej. EIE is not an option, you are as sensory as it gets, not an intuitive. Can be merry but the quadra would be more Fi-valuing, but what's with the aristocracy uhh. The easy route: I mean, SEE even fits your field of interest and profession. You like a bunch of ESFp and INTp artists, and ENFp ones. Disregard for Se-less types (EII, your supervisee). Yeah, SEE.

Yep, exactly what SEE (aka Caesar/Napoleon etc) would say. Se --> driven, happiness --> Fi, Te---> business matters, Ni ---> purpose.

So let me understand: first I'm bursting with Se and Fi, now I'm overflowing with Ni and Te? How come you know see the exact opposite functions in the same answers?

About ILI, you've said:

Hm... your dual (ILI) is melancholic, suffering, cruel-world-hating

And then I told you several times in detail how much I can't relate and hate this attitude and worldview.



I don't know if you seen my last post on your V.I. typing thread, but this analysis of yours just further proof the points I've made there:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1157646

I'm sorry if my feedback isn't more positive, but your typing went from SEE>SLE>ILI. Using the same material. Please explain.

It's also very ironic how I took three typing tests yesterday and guess what the result was in all 3?

[darya]

This person isn't ILI

[LuckyOne]

This person isn't ILI

Yeah I tried my best not to be mean,but...It honestly got me thinking it was a prank.

[Exodus]

Chae can you please address your interpretation of these statements?:

"Boring people are people who have nothing of interest to contribute to a conversation or nothing that makes you want to figure them out"
"The system runs on misery and human desperation"

What information elements do you see here?

Also, where do you see Te in the questionnaire?

[LuckyOne]

Chae can you please address your interpretation of these statements?:

"Boring people are people who have nothing of interest to contribute to a conversation or nothing that makes you want to figure them out"
"The system runs on misery and human desperation"

What information elements do you see here?

Also, where do you see Te in the questionnaire?

I second that.

[Chae]

Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this, I'd never expected you to. To go all this work to help me...I appreciate it so so much

Now onto the typing itself:

The scans don't explain anything. I have zero idea of why you attributed a lot of the answers to the functions you pointed out. Why would this be indicative of Ni, for example?


Is it because I used the word "forever", which is indicative of time? Because it makes no sense to me.

Or this (again, where's the Ni?):


So having people do nice things for me without asking is indicative of Ni? How?

Again, what's Ni about this answer?:


If anything, it'd be Fi.


I picked only the only ones I found more baffling, but really, this came out of the left field. When I first posted the questionnaire, this is what you said about it:



Then this:





So let me understand: first I'm bursting with Se and Fi, now I'm overflowing with Ni and Te? How come you know see the exact opposite functions in the same answers?

About ILI, you've said:



And then I told you several times in detail how much I can't relate and hate this attitude and worldview.



I don't know if you seen my last post on your V.I. typing thread, but this analysis of yours just further proof the points I've made there:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1157646

I'm sorry if my feedback isn't more positive, but your typing went from SEE>SLE>ILI. Using the same material. Please explain.

It's also very ironic how I took three typing tests yesterday and guess what the result was in all 3?

"Stay there forever" is an intuitive statement, not sensory. Si would be: "Just feeling comfy right now". You added a temporal context.

The "they do it for me" part was Se-seeking so I wrote Ni. You attracting SeFi also reflects in your description of the interesting person.

The fulfillment part was contra-Fe so again I wrote Ni, but you are right, Fi is also there.

Well my different analyses correspond with my depth of analysis, I always need time to get into it. Also. If you think my work is not accurate I challenge you to do it better. Stop the scrutiny and give your own point of view so we can figure your type out, using the IEs.

Read the interview again - ILI - literally the Critic, Gamma negativist (you are doing that right now, criticizing using time, business logic and then your demonstrative: "first you did this, that, etc, it's not factual, and that makes no sense")

Which typing tests?

[Chae]

Chae can you please address your interpretation of these statements?:

"Boring people are people who have nothing of interest to contribute to a conversation or nothing that makes you want to figure them out"
"The system runs on misery and human desperation"

What information elements do you see here?

Also, where do you see Te in the questionnaire?

First statement: intuition
Second: Ti + Fe PoLR --> expressed through Ni for the global view.

Te I see where I wrote it! In most cases, she first draws from time-based experience and then executes it via Te. See instructions part. Or mention of Kibbe. Situation-dependent approach, refer to question of professional or comparing cultures, "lack of talent [...] should be doing something else", credibility mention, "making good use of it", emotions can be "counter-productive", "useless to think about it".

[Chae]

This person isn't ILI

Provide thy argumentssss

[darya]

Provide thy argumentssss

Niet

[Chae]

Niet

Why though

[Chae]

Yeah I tried my best not to be mean,but...It honestly got me thinking it was a prank.

Your reaction made me think the same

[Exodus]

First statement: intuition
Second: Ti + Fe PoLR --> expressed through Ni for the global view.

Te I see where I wrote it! In most cases, she first draws from time-based experience and then executes it via Te. See instructions part. Or mention of Kibbe. Situation-dependent approach, refer to question of professional or comparing cultures, "lack of talent [...] should be doing something else", credibility mention, "making good use of it", emotions can be "counter-productive", "useless to think about it".

ok, this is how I see it:

The first statement is primarily about Fe (maybe also with some intuition). What makes an "interesting person" could probably be interpreted with either Fe or Ne, but the paragraph as a whole isn't characteristic at all of Fe Vulnerable types -- they don't really have a concept of a "boring person."

The second one is more typically a Beta worldview: TiSe ("the system runs on" ... i.e. there is a political interest, manifested as a system) and FeNi ("misery and desperation").

ILI maybe isn't a crazy typing but I'm really not seeing a ton of Te. Saying an emotion can be "counter-productive" is hardly evidence of strong or valued Te. The questionnaire really doesn't give a lot of info but based on the little there is, Beta NF would make more sense.

[Chae]

ok, this is how I see it:

The first statement is primarily about Fe (maybe also with some intuition). What makes an "interesting person" could probably be interpreted with either Fe or Ne, but the paragraph as a whole isn't characteristic at all of Fe Vulnerable types -- they don't really have a concept of a "boring person."

The second one is more typically a Beta worldview: TiSe ("the system runs on" ... i.e. there is a political interest, manifested as a system) and FeNi ("misery and desperation").

ILI maybe isn't a crazy typing but I'm really not seeing a ton of Te. Saying an emotion can be "counter-productive" is hardly evidence of strong or valued Te. The questionnaire really doesn't give a lot of info but based on the little there is, Beta NF would make more sense.

Yes, thanks for elaborating though. Mhm definitely all about the system so yes yes and yes Ti is there. Going by one paragraph is difficult, as you said, the info is scarce due to the format. But as a whole: since Fi is strong, IEI or ILI-Ni, what would be your argument for EIE? The "freeing from shackles toward happiness" made me think FeSe. Yet as far as I see it, personal, subjective morals are more pronounced.
Is your new 80Q in progress? Maybe we can try again to get it right. What would you say to the Fe polr highlights in the scans?

[Exodus]

Yes, thanks for elaborating though. Mhm definitely all about the system so yes yes and yes Ti is there. Going by one paragraph is difficult, as you said, the info is scarce due to the format. But as a whole: since Fi is strong, IEI or ILI-Ni, what would be your argument for EIE? The "freeing from shackles toward happiness" made me think FeSe. Yet as far as I see it, personal, subjective morals are more pronounced.

I agree there does seem to be a good deal of Fi, and more of a withdrawn attitude towards the world.

Is your new 80Q in progress? Maybe we can try again to get it right.

It's in progress, still not satisfied with it though. Maybe I'll just put it out there anyways.

What would you say to the Fe polr highlights in the scans?

I only cook by myself for example, because I know that if i had people with me they’d be shocked with my methods of doing thins and I don’t want to stand their questioning it when they always prize the results so much. I hate this kind of thing really, it’s a hypocrisy.

Doesn't that sound a lot more like Te PoLR to you? It suggests someone who is sensitive to criticism in logical functions, could even be Ti suggestive. Same with the library question.

"I'm told I'm very intimidating", "going for the kill" -- just Se

[Chae]

I agree there does seem to be a good deal of Fi, and more of a withdrawn attitude towards the world.



It's in progress, still not satisfied with it though. Maybe I'll just put it out there anyways.





Doesn't that sound a lot more like Te PoLR to you? It suggests someone who is sensitive to criticism in logical functions, could even be Ti suggestive. Same with the library question.

"I'm told I'm very intimidating", "going for the kill" -- just Se

It is!!! Please post it You can indicate the parts you are not satisfied with so we can work on it collectively?

Yes, and a less objective one. Wow good point I didn't see that yet ... Fe over Te in the kitchen.

Ti HA over Ti suggestive, she provides the logical "system" building approach herself. Se use is also there but e8 is playing us, a person who gets told they /become/ intimidating is not intimidating by default and therefore surprises everyone when they use volitional energy.
Also!! Te polr: approach to pyramid building! No patience to explain. "Labor of some sort". "No choice" concerning why people have to work. Si is not disregarded like that, I have a hard time seeing it as the vulnerable.

[LuckyOne]

"Stay there forever" is an intuitive statement, not sensory. Si would be: "Just feeling comfy right now". You added a temporal context.

No. Just no.

There is no such thing an "intuitive statement". You can't use an extremely common hyperbole like this to infer a person's type. And who brought up Si? It also would be grammatically incorrect to say " feeling comfy right now" , which is a gerund phrase when this is a questionnaire, not a conversation taking place right now or a recollection of one.

"
The "they do it for me" part was Se-seeking so I wrote Ni. You attracting SeFi also reflects in your description of the interesting person.

What part of "I don't even have to ask" do you fail to comprehend? All my answer proved was that Si isn't valued, Se seeking would me looking for someone to do it for me, which isn't the case.

The fulfillment part was contra-Fe so again I wrote Ni, but you are right, Fi is also there.

I repeat: where's the Ni? You have yet to answer that. That sentence is all Fi.

Well my different analyses correspond with my depth of analysis, I always need time to get into it. Also. If you think my work is not accurate I challenge you to do it better. Stop the scrutiny and give your own point of view so we can figure your type out, using the IEs.

Ok, so you have done a 180º in your typing and you attribute it to having extended time for analysis. Going from ILE>LII would make sense using this argument, but from SEE>ILI? You can't go from saying a person is Se leading to Se suggestive and attribute the change to time.

And now you resort to the most infantile attack of all: when somebody challenges you competency/accuracy you respond with the same thing. "Then do it better yourself!!!" is the epitome of Ne + Fi.

"
Read the interview again - ILI - literally the Critic, Gamma negativist (you are doing that right now, criticizing using time, business logic and then your demonstrative: "first you did this, that, etc, it's not factual, and that makes no sense")

Which typing tests?

I am being negative because there is no other option. You posted something that is not only incorrect but illogical in several parts (how could I think you were an ILI yourself is now beyond me). So of course any person will point out the many discrepancies between your fast changing attitudes and assessments, not to mention your reasonings for the questionnaire attributed values. @darya isn't a LII or anything close, she isn't even a Logical type, and yet she also has clearly point out how absurd the result is.


You are trying to use typism as a coup' out. I'm not having it.

First statement: intuition
Second: Ti + Fe PoLR --> expressed through Ni for the global view.

Te I see where I wrote it! In most cases, she first draws from time-based experience and then executes it via Te. See instructions part. Or mention of Kibbe. Situation-dependent approach, refer to question of professional or comparing cultures, "lack of talent [...] should be doing something else", credibility mention, "making good use of it", emotions can be "counter-productive", "useless to think about it".

Which proves you don't really get Te either. Desire for purpose, competency and accuracy =/= Te

Drawing from first hand experience is Si, which you just said it yourself is what I do first, but which you chose to not refer to, just the supposed second step (Te). If we follow this logic, then Si>Te so SLI. Which in fact is the only type who has this technique described in every profile.


You are yet again, proving just how Ti valuing you are. You've created a personal logic and is determined to cling to it (as I've said in another thread) for good or worse, no matter how many people challenge you on it. That would not be a problem in itself if you logic made sense (if you were Ti ego), but it doesn't. Wanting to make sense and when failing and having it pointed out, reacts badly= classic Ti PoLR. And you are, no matter how much you try to hide with humour or nonchalance, emotionally invested in the theories you believe in, self created or adopted. That's creative Fi. You easily come up with an explanation to every detour you take in reasoning, which frequently comes out of left field= strong Ne.

This thread served a very good purpose: proved me that I was right in identifying you as a Ne leading type. But your Ethical, not Logical. As I've should've know for your over sensitiveness about your idols, among other things I won't refer to here because they're personal.

Yes, thanks for elaborating though. Mhm definitely all about the system so yes yes and yes Ti is there. Going by one paragraph is difficult, as you said, the info is scarce due to the format. But as a whole: since Fi is strong, IEI or ILI-Ni, what would be your argument for EIE? The "freeing from shackles toward happiness" made me think FeSe. Yet as far as I see it, personal, subjective morals are more pronounced.
Is your new 80Q in progress? Maybe we can try again to get it right. What would you say to the Fe polr highlights in the scans?

This is one of many examples (especially in the BTS and iKON thread) of you readily accepting information before screening it first. Which is indicative of...? You know the answer.

You and @thehhotelambush are right about strong Fi. A very strong one indeed.

It is!!! Please post it You can indicate the parts you are not satisfied with so we can work on it collectively?

Yes, and a less objective one. Wow good point I didn't see that yet ... Fe over Te in the kitchen.

Ti HA over Ti suggestive, she provides the logical "system" building approach herself. Se use is also there but e8 is playing us, a person who gets told they /become/ intimidating is not intimidating by default and therefore surprises everyone when they use volitional energy.
Also!! Te polr: approach to pyramid building! No patience to explain. "Labor of some sort". "No choice" concerning why people have to work. Si is not disregarded like that, I have a hard time seeing it as the vulnerable.

Yes, Ti valuing, now you're onto something. And no, e8 is not playing you, it's helping. And I am intimidating by default, I told you as much on that private message, remember, That's the first impression most people have of me, go back and reread it.

By the way, I've already found my type. It's the one several people have attributed to me back when I first got into Socionics years ago. I couldn't accept it then, but I do now, because it makes 200% sense.

Let's see if you can find it too. Hint: "overwhelming Fi" is how my answers were described back then.

[Chae]

No. Just no.

There is no such thing an "intuitive statement". You can't use an extremely common hyperbole like this to infer a person's type. And who the hell brought up Si? It also would be grammatically incorrect to say " feeling comfy right now" , which is a gerund phrase when this is a questionnaire, not a conversation taking place right now or a recollection of one.



What part of "I don't even have to ask" do you fail to comprehend? All my answer proved was that Si isn't valued, Se seeking would me looking for someone to do it for me, which isn't the case.


I repeat: where's the Ni? You have yet to answer that. That sentence is all Fi.



Ok, so you have done a 180º in your typing and you attribute it to having extended time for analysis. Going from ILE>LII would make sense using this argument, but from SEE>ILI? You can't go from saying a person is Se leading to Se suggestive and attribute the change to time.

And now you resort to the most infantile attack of all: when somebody challenges you competency/accuracy you respond with the same thing. "Then do it better yourself!!!" is the epitome of Ne + Fi.




I am being negative because there is no other option. You posted something that is not only incorrect but illogical in several parts (how could I think you were an ILI yourself is now beyond me). So of course any person will point out the many discrepancies between your fast changing attitudes and assessments, not to mention your reasonings for the questionnaire attributed values. @darya isn't a LII or anything close, she isn't even a Logical type, and yet she also has clearly point out how absurd the result is.


You are trying to use typism as a coup' out. I'm not having it.




Which proves you don't really get Te either. Desire for purpose, competency and accuracy =/= Te

Drawing from first hand experience is Si, which you just said it yourself is what I do first, but which you chose to not refer to, just the supposed second step (Te). If we follow this logic, then Si>Te so SLI. Which in fact is the only type who has this technique described in every profile.


You are yet again, proving just how Ti valuing you are. You've created a personal logic and is determined to cling to it (as I've said in another thread) for good or worse, no matter how many people challenge you on it. That would not be a problem in itself if you logic made sense (if you were Ti ego), but it doesn't. Wanting to make sense and when failing and having it pointed out, reacts badly= classic Ti PoLR. And you are, no matter how much you try to hide with humour or nonchalance, emotionally invested in the theories you believe in, self created or adopted. That's creative Fi. You easily come up with an explanation to every detour you take in reasoning, which frequently comes out of left field= strong Ne.

This thread served a very good purpose: proved me that I was right in identifying you as a Ne leading type. But your Ethical, not Logical. As I've should've know for your over sensitiveness about your idols, among other things I won't refer to here because they're personal. All this time you've been trying out costumes, but you're real face is now completely revealed to me.



This is one of many examples (especially in the BTS and iKON thread) of you readily accepting information before screening it first. Which is indicative of...? You know the answer.

You and @thehhotelambush are right about strong Fi. A very strong one indeed.



Yes, Ti valuing, now you're onto something. And no, e8 is not playing you, it's helping. And I am intimidating by default, I told you as much on that private message, remember, That's the first impression most people have of me, go back and reread it.

By the way, I've already found my type. It's the one several people have attributed to me back when I first got into Socionics years ago. I couldn't accept it then, but I do now, because it makes 200% sense.

Let's see if you can find it too. Hint: we have referenced it many times before.

The bottom line, and this is great, you found a type for both me and you

[LuckyOne]

The bottom line, and this is great, you found a type for both me and you

Precisely.I'm happy with mine,are you with yours?

[Chae]

Precisely.I'm happy with mine,are you with yours?

Great. And of course, Jeon Jungkook as my dual... that sounds really good. Other than that, Ne-Te explains a lot of what I do so that's perfect^^

[Exodus]

@LuckyOne what type do you think you are? "Very strong" Fi, valued Ti, intimidating?
Also, I'm sensing quite a bit of combativeness here...

[LuckyOne]

@LuckyOne what type do you think you are? "Very strong" Fi, valued Ti, intimidating?
Also, I'm sensing quite a bit of combativeness here...

SEE-Se. Coupled with SX/SP 8w7-7w8-3w2, I guess it's what makes me intimidating.

[The Exception]

@LuckyOne what type do you think you are? "Very strong" Fi, valued Ti, intimidating?
Also, I'm sensing quite a bit of combativeness here...

Exactly. While I may not completely agree with Chae's assessment (I think LuckyOne is most likely SEE) I respect the time and effort she put into her analysis. LuckyOne should try to act more respectful towards her even if he doesn't agree with the typing.

[LuckyOne]

Exactly. While I may not completely agree with Chae's assessment (I think LuckyOne is most likely SEE) I respect the time and effort she put into her analysis. LuckyOne should try to act more respectful towards her even if he doesn't agree with the typing.

I'd appreciate if you refrained from passing judgement and offering unsolicited and uninformed advice on something you know nothing about.

I have a very close relationship with @Chae that goes much beyond what you've seen on this thread, and she has never voiced a complait about my communication style with her. She knows me enough to not take it personaly, and our banter can get pretty " rough", sometimes we even do it for fun.

You are the one being disrespectful. It's live you're coming into my house uninvited and telling me how I should treat my family. Stay in your lane.

[Exodus]

@LuckyOne ok, SEE is reasonable, it's ethical and Se-valuing at least. You said you got into socionics a while ago, what was your username before?

[LuckyOne]

@LuckyOne ok, SEE is reasonable, it's ethical and Se-valuing at least. You said you got into socionics a while ago, what was your username before?

I signed up for the forum about 2 years ago but never made a post under that name. My typing thread was the first time I was active instead of just lurking.

[The Exception]

I'd appreciate if you refrained from passing judgement and offering unsolicited and uninformed advice on something you know nothing about.

I have a very close relationship with @Chae that goes much beyond what you've seen on this thread, and she has never voiced a complait about my communication style with her. She knows me enough to not take it personaly, and our banter can get pretty " rough", sometimes we even do it for fun.

You are the one being disrespectful. It's live you're coming into my house uninvited and telling me how I should treat my family. Stay in your lane.

How was I or other people on this forum supposed to know about your relationship with Chae? At first glance I think many people would find the things you say 'disrespectul.' Its fine if you have that kind of banter outside of the forum but this is a public forum.

But lets face it, you are my conflictor and I feel like my PoLR is being hit with your harshness. We can't expect to see eye-to-eye on these types of things.

[LuckyOne]

How was I or other people on this forum supposed to know about your relationship with Chae? At first glance I think many people would find the things you say 'disrespectul.' Its fine if you have that kind of banter outside of the forum but this is a public forum.

But lets face it, you are my conflictor and I feel like my PoLR is being hit with your harshness. We can't expect to see eye-to-eye on these types of things.

You clearly don't see how you're in the wrong here, do you?

You being "hit" by my harshness, which not only wasn't directed at you, but which the "victim" as perceived by you, has voiced no complaint about, doesn't give you the right to come in and say what I should or shouldn't do. There should be no need for additional information about our relationship. It doesn't concern you or anyone else but @Chae and me. And if you haven't noticed, you are the only one who reacted to it.

My problem with your post wasn't your judgement about me, but your sense of entitlement. Regardless of agreeing about the issue (my "rudeness"), or our supposed Socionics type relations, the point you're missing remains the same: control your reactions and do not interfere in other people's business.

[The Exception]

You clearly don't see how you're in the wrong here, do you?

You being "hit" by my harshness, which not only wasn't directed at you, but which the "victim" as perceived by you, has voiced no complaint about, doesn't give you the right to come in and say what I should or shouldn't do. There should be no need for additional information about our relationship. It doesn't concern you or anyone else but @Chae and me. And if you haven't noticed, you are the only one who reacted to it.

My problem with your post wasn't your judgement about me, but your sense of entitlement. Regardless of agreeing about the issue (my "rudeness"), or our supposed Socionics type relations, the point you're missing remains the same: control your reactions and do not interfere in other people's business.

I don't have a sense of entitlement. I just want an atmosphere where people can feel comfortable posting things and not feel like their intelligence is being insulted.

I may the only one so far that has reacted by speaking up about it and replied to the thread but that doesn't mean there aren't other people that maybe reacted internally but didn't speak up about it.

I'm done discussing this with you because obviously we aren't going to see eye to eye on this so arguing any more about it is futile.

[LuckyOne]

I don't have a sense of entitlement. I just want an atmosphere where people can feel comfortable posting things and not feel like their intelligence is being insulted.

I may the only one so far that has reacted by speaking up about it and replied to the thread but that doesn't mean there aren't other people that maybe reacted internally but didn't speak up about it.

I'm done discussing this with you because obviously we aren't going to see eye to eye on this so arguing any more about it is futile.

There would be nothing else to be discussed indeed, since both of the points you tried to make were already addressed and clarified by me. But it seems you missed them anyway, so arrouvoir.

[Chae]

@LuckyOne already expressed her gratitude:

Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this, I'd never expected you to. To go all this work to help me...I appreciate it so so much

The following critique and corrections were legit since they contributed to getting her type right so there's nothing to worry about. If I spread pure bs of course she can get harsh, otherwise I can't get stopped And if a personal line is crossed I can put my girl in her place myself heh



It's cute and very kind to defend me but I like to be personally responsible in our interaction. We should move on and stop fighting to get productive, i.e. check if the subtype, tritype is correct.

[The Exception]

@LuckyOne already expressed her gratitude:



The following critique and corrections were legit since they contributed to getting her type right so there's nothing to worry about. If I spread pure bs of course she can get harsh, otherwise I can't get stopped And if a personal line is crossed I can put my girl in her place myself heh



It's cute and very kind to defend me but I like to be personally responsible in our interaction. We should move on and stop fighting to get productive, i.e. check if the subtype, tritype is correct.

Yeah, I think I overreacted a bit. I didn't know about your personal relationship when I wrote the comment. If you're okay with it then everything is cool.

I think my role Fi sometimes gets me into trouble. I will see something I perceive on first glance as somehow being rude or harsh. Such as, it would be more polite to state it this way, etc. But I don't know the overall context of the situation. Also role functions can be rather inflexible and I know mine tends to be sometimes.

[Chae]

Yeah, I think I overreacted a bit. I didn't know about your personal relationship when I wrote the comment. If you're okay with it then everything is cool.

I think my role Fi sometimes gets me into trouble. I will see something I perceive on first glance as somehow being rude or harsh. Such as, it would be more polite to state it this way, etc. But I don't know the overall context of the situation. Also role functions can be rather inflexible and I know mine tends to be sometimes.

No need to apologize It's ok, now you know what's going on here. There's nothing wrong with your role Fi, we just didn't display that we are closer than visible from the outside