Quote Originally Posted by Soupman View Post
If you read the whole response you'd figure out there is information missing based on the PM communication we heard which didn't necessarily end well. Regardless this was just a blunt message about the failure of communication between me and him.

Dude did you miss the earlier arguments/post? That perspective is not universal and critical thinking also exposes why - everyone gets inspired differently by "Jung" and the esoteric ideas behind "thinking" "feeling" "intuition", & "sensation" allude everyone. And there isn't a universal metric to discern the most appropriate interpretation of the ideas. With the exception of the esoteric idea of "information-abstraction-styles" very few seem to grasp.
ya I read it. Actually when you was saying "esoteric ideas" I thought you meant the fact that Jung entire base is from the perspective of the perceiver. For example Si is defined as how the perceiver of Si view an object. Basically everything Jung states is the perspective of the perceiver. The subjective part is how the person have storied their memory and apply it to this object.

But ya, you were a dick.