Thoughts on my type?

[Myst]

Ell-Fi. Fair enough.

Does it fit for you?

In regards to your questions, though:

Firstly, "An example where you actually scheduled/"compartmentalized" to help someone make their lives more efficient?":

I contacted the teacher for the class so that I could get the work for the rest of the marking period. I then took each lesson, simplified/provided clearer instruction, asked a few classmates to work on the material for feedback, made adjustments, then handed the complete simplified material back to the classmate in question. He passed the class with an A-.

Well that's pretty helpful.

Secondly, "A serial killer's viewpoint about wanting and planning to kill the next victim is also valid?"

If you define valid as "(of an argument or point) having a sound basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent." then no, as plotting to kill a person isn't very fair to the person in question.
If you define valid as "legally binding due to having been executed in compliance with the law." then yes, as it's legal to plan such a thing, so long as you don't take a substantial step in committing the crime.

"Valid" is defined here as in your declaration of "valid viewpoint". So how about that?

The Ne subtype will appear more irrational compared to the Fi subtype. Both subtypes are still more rational overall because EII is a rational type.

Why I said EII-Ne looks more like LII is from the enhancement of the Ne creative which is also shared with LII. The EII-Fi would enhance base Fi, which can make it look more similar to ESI.

Yes, both are a Rational type obviously, I said "strongly Rational" for OP, which is the Fi subtype, as you yourself say.

As for the 2nd point, I get your reasoning and to you EII-Ne might look more like LII, not to me.

[GuavaDrunk]

I can't say that I relate.

A'ight

Sorry for late reply - life happened.

What mostly jumps out at me from your second questionnaire is how e9 it sounds. It mostly reminds me of qualities and reactions in myself that, frankly, I try to work against. Because of that, I find it a little hard to see much else in the questionnaire, because my internal 'loss-of-self' alarm chimes are all: "~*look for the dark side*~", and this is just not socionically helpful.
As such, I will decline to comment, apart from saying that you may well be Delta.

However, you may not be Delta, too.

Tagging @Myst in.

[Myst]

A'ight

Sorry for late reply - life happened.

What mostly jumps out at me from your second questionnaire is how e9 it sounds. It mostly reminds me of qualities and reactions in myself that, frankly, I try to work against. Because of that, I find it a little hard to see much else in the questionnaire, because my internal 'loss-of-self' alarm chimes are all: "~*look for the dark side*~", and this is just not socionically helpful.
As such, I will decline to comment, apart from saying that you may well be Delta.

However, you may not be Delta, too.

Tagging @Myst in.

OP doesn't really come off like you. You both may be E9 but you seem to write a lot differently.

[GuavaDrunk]

OP doesn't really come off like you. You both may be E9 but you seem to write a lot differently.

Quadra difference? Sheer personality? Varied facets of Ze Enneagram? Different instinct stackings? Phase of the moon? OP seems to have embraced the search for harmony more than I have, that's for sure.

[Myst]

Quadra difference? Sheer personality? Varied facets of Ze Enneagram? Different instinct stackings? Phase of the moon? OP seems to have embraced the search for harmony more than I have, that's for sure.

I see OP more on the Fi side of things here and you on the Fe side. How I'd sum that up is, I see you as having more power to directly affect other people emotionally while OP is a bit more... in their own bubble, despite being very helpful and all that.