Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: [meta] SSS 80-question questionnaire critique

  1. #1
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,400
    Mentioned
    325 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question [meta] SSS 80-question questionnaire critique

    Some people expressed interest in hearing my thoughts on the 80q questionnaire, which Joy has advocated for typing people. The questionnaire does give some good information, mainly because of how long it is. But the idea behind the questionnaire is that it is supposed to force people to use the given IM element, and people will switch to other ones depending on their type. In my opinion it does not really accomplish this in most of the questions. Many of the questions are either only vaguely related to IM or are actually related to different IM elements. Comments are in italics.

    Block I (Ti)

    General to specific, specific to general – what does it mean?
    This is Ti but it's sort of a bizarre question to ask. I'm not a fan of the "define the term" questions really.

    What does "logical" mean? What is your understanding? Do you think that it correlates with the common view?
    Same

    How do you explain fractions on the dial of the clock?
    Same, but I don't even know what the expected answer here is. I guess the idea is that the clock is divided into 12ths.

    What is a rule? What rules do you have to follow?
    Same, too vague.

    What is hierarchy? Do you need to follow it? Why or why not?
    Hierarchy also involves Se.

    What do you think of instructions? Do you use them? Could you write an instruction manual? If so, what type of instruction manual would you most likely write?
    sure, also Ti, maybe with some Te.

    Please explain: "Freedom is in complying with the laws, but not in ignoring the laws"? Do you agree with the statement? Why?
    TiSe

    Tell us how about consistent you are?
    Ti

    What is a "standard"? Why do people need it?
    Ti, but again rather vague.

    How do you feel about this block?

    Overall this block is getting at the right kind of information, much more than most other ones. It has some rather vague and unmotivated questions, but if people make an honest attempt at answering them they will have to use Ti.

    Block II (Te)

    What is work in your opinion? Why do people go to work? Are there any parameters where you can distinguish whether you can do this work or not?
    Pretty good, although "work" can be an Se word also. The third question is too vague but it's sort of an NeTe question.

    Is there any correlation between quality and quantity? Tell us if or how the price depends on quality?
    TeSi

    How do people determine the quality of work? How do you determine such quality? How well you can determine the quality of any purchase, do you pay any attention to it?
    TeSi

    How do you feel if you didn't finish some work? Does it ever happen? What are the reasons?

    What is "Interesting work" for you?
    really Ne

    You go to the store and see something you're interested in buying; there is a price tag on it. What parameters are you going to use to understand if it's overpriced, underpriced, or priced correctly?
    Te

    When you work and someone tells you: "You don't do it right." What is your reaction?
    Te

    There is a professional right next to you. You always see that you can't perform the way they do. Your feelings, thoughts and actions?
    Te

    When you have to ask someone else to help you with the task, how do you feel?
    Te

    You need to build a pyramid exactly like in Egypt. Your thoughts, feelings and actions?
    maybe some Se, building a pyramid is a rather large project

    How did you feel about this block?

    This block is mostly about Te but it doesn't give a whole lot of insight into how good someone is at understanding/doing it.

    Block III (Si)

    What is beauty? Do you change your opinion about beauty? Does your understanding correlate with the generally accepted notion? What goes beyond the generally accepted notion?
    "Beauty" can be related to Si, Fe, or Se. Primarily people are going to use the latter two to answer this.

    Please describe your understanding of a beautifully dressed person. What is the core of beauty? How do you explain what is beautiful to a person who has never heard about beauty before?
    same

    Is there a template of understanding what beautiful means for everyone to use? Is there such a term as "classical beauty"? If so, what is it?
    Again, this is not likely to elicit Si usage.

    What is comfort? What is coziness? How do you create your comfort and coziness? How do others evaluate your skill in doing so? Do you agree with them?
    good

    How do you pick your own clothes? Do you follow fashion? Why? Do you know how to select clothes for different types of figures?
    Fashion is really more Fe.

    How do you cook? Do you follow recipes? What do others think of your skill?
    TeSi, also Ne

    Are you good at color patterns and mixing them and matching?
    Similar to the first question, possibly some ethics again.

    If someone is telling you what is beautiful and what is not, what goes with what color and what is not, do you agree with this person?

    Tell us how you'd design any room, house or an office. Do you do it yourself or trust someone else to do it? Why?
    Si, but also involves ethics (the way I understand it, interior design is usually not about pragmatic function).

    How do you know if a person has bad taste? Could you give us an example? Do you always trust your own taste or do you seek opinions from others?
    FeSi

    How do you feel about this block?

    Pretty mediocre. I'm not sure there are a lot of written questions that would elicit usage of Si. Si is very experiential and difficult to explain using abstract terminology.

    Block IV (Se)

    Can you line up human resources and make them do things? What methods do you use? Can you press people? If so, how does it happen?
    good, maybe a little Te

    What is incursion? How do you deal with this? Can you repulse? How easy can you do it?
    Se but vague

    What does "my people" and "strangers" mean? When do "my people" become "strangers" and why?
    ditto. Maybe some Fi.

    Are there strategies of attack? Can you use them? When is it justified?
    Se but vague

    Do you think it's ok to occupy someone else's territory? In what situations?
    Se doesn't really evaluate whether something is "ok", it just does it. That's more Ti, or maybe Fi.

    What are the methods of volitional force? When is it most effective and in what situations?
    vague

    How do you protect yourself and your interests?
    fine

    Describe your behavior in the situations of opposition and if you have to use some force?
    good

    Do others think of you as a strong person? Do you think you are a strong person?
    good

    How do you understand if a person is strong? Are there any signs of a strong person? What is the core of any force? Why do people listen to one person, but not the other?
    good

    Like Ti, overall this block demonstrates a good understanding of the element.

    Block V (Fi)

    What is boorishness? Does your understanding of it correlate with the generally accepted notion? How would you explain what boorishness mean to a 10 year old child? How would you explain the same to an adult who does not behave ethically?
    boorish: "rough and bad-mannered; coarse." No connection to Fi whatsoever. Fe or even FeSi.

    How would you improve the moral of the society?
    Could be Fi but also Ti. Really Ti is more about evaluating things at the societal level.

    Can you justify somebody's bad behavior by thinking that he/she wasn't taught how to do so?
    This is FiNe. I don't see how the question exactly evaluates one's relationship to this, it's just a yes or no question.

    Give us your understanding of love. Can you love and punish at the same time?
    "love" is Fi, could also elicit an Fe response though. Punishment is related to Se.

    Have you heard about the Southern hospitality? Everything is for the guest. There is also a German hospitality – the master of the house is always right. What method is the right one? Try to evaluate without the weight of any cultural aspects, traditions, nations etc.
    This is like "FeSi or TiSe - which is better?" Nothing to do with Fi.

    What is sympathy? When do you need to express it? When is it advised not to?
    Sympathy is Fi but I'm not sure this is a great way to evaluate someone's understanding of it.

    Are there any norms of behavior in the society? Do you follow them? Do people always have to follow them? Why?
    Ti

    How do you know what attitude among people is right or wrong?
    Fi valuers do not generally care about others' attitudes. That's really more about Fe.

    What does moral mean? What is immoral? Does your understanding correlate with the others? How can you evaluate the correctness of your own understanding?
    Fi or Ti

    Somebody is giving you a negative attitude – what is your reaction? Could you show your own negative attitude toward someone else? If so, how? Could you give a person the silent treatment? How easily do you forgive people?
    ethics in general

    How did you feel about this block?

    This block is extremely flawed and tests other IM elements, although it has a few Fi questions.

    Block VI (Fe)

    "Whole world does not cost one tear of child" – how do you understand this phrase? Do you agree with this opinion?
    This is really Fi

    Is it acceptable to express emotions? Give examples of inappropriate expression of emotions.
    Fe, although vague/pointless

    Can you use negative emotions? In what situations?
    hmmm - "using" emotions sounds more like SeFi, though it involves Fe.

    How do you express negative emotions? What does it look like? What do others think about it?
    fine

    Shallow emotions – what does it mean? Are there any other emotions?
    Fi valuers might consider certain emotions "shallow", but that's using Fi. Seems like they got Fi and Fe backwards.

    What are right or wrong emotions?
    Not Fe.

    Can you change the emotional state of yourself? Of others? To what side – positive or negative?
    fine

    What does it mean to "pour out your emotions"? How does it happen?
    fine

    Does your internal emotional state correlate with what you show externally?
    Fe but not likely to give clear information about type

    Do you track what mood you are in throughout the day? Do you notice the mood of others?
    good

    This block is sort of middling in its relation to Fe, though it may produce responses that give information.

    Block VII (Ni)

    Do you like surprises?
    Surprises = Ne, so to that extent a negative answer could indicate low or unvalued Ne

    How people change? How do you feel about those changes? Can others see the changes?
    ok sort of

    Is it true that whatever happens is only for the best?
    Not really Ni, or at least not very high Ni. An ESE might very well express this view.

    What do you think of horoscopes, fortune telling etc.? Do you believe in luck, lucky fortuity?
    These things are related to Ni, not so much luck.

    Can you forecast events? Is it even real?
    poor English here -- believing in fortunetelling is not necessarily about Ni. For example, Gamma NTs might be skeptical of it due to Te.

    What is time? How do you feel time? Can you "kill" time? How?
    Ni but vague

    Do you need help creating forecasts and determining how something will end? Do you trust those forecasts?
    ok

    Are you normally late? How do you react if someone is late?
    Russian socionists classically attribute Ni to timeliness, which I don't agree with at all. Ni creatives seem to be more in a rush than Ni leading types but this also has to do with Se.

    Imagine the situation where you agreed to meet with someone. Your feelings and actions: a) 20 minutes before the meeting starts, b) 5 minutes before the meeting starts, c) it is time for the meeting to start, but the person is not here, d) 20 minutes after the meeting start time and the person is not here, e) more time and the person is still not here…
    same thing.

    How did you feel about this block?

    Average quality

    Block VIII (Ne)

    Is there a meaning of life? In what? Is it the same for everybody?
    Ni, or even NiFe

    What should be done so people can be happy?
    more FeSi than Ne

    In the situations with a lot of potential and volatility will you trust your own guts, logically calculating everything or will you ask people you trust what should be done?
    potential is Ne, sure, but volatility is more Se. The actual question part at the end may also involve logic.

    When you meet a stranger, what can you say about them right away? How do you know what this person is all about? Does it take long to understand someone's talents?
    You can't really get an Ne impression right when you meet someone. You're mostly going based off how they look, their mannerisms -- Fe and Se.

    Remember an interesting person and call out 5-6 qualities you think are interesting in them. What makes an interesting person? Are you an interesting person? Why? What if someone calls you "boring" and "not interesting"?
    Good, this is Ne.

    What opinions, from people who know you, seem: a) fair; b) not fair; c) hurtful; d) strange.
    The general ability to consider different views is Ne, possibly also with Ti. So the first two are ok, but (c) involves Fi.

    Do you fantasize? What kind of fantasies do you have?
    Maybe Ne but more Ni.

    What qualities should a person have to be successful and why?
    "Success" is an Se word mainly, it implies a singular notion of how to be successful (Ni).

    What qualities can stop a person from being successful and why?
    ditto

    What is more important in life – to be a good person or be a successful one? Why? Is a good person always successful? If not, then why?
    ditto. Also, "being a good person" really has little to do with Ne, it's really Fi.

    This block has hardly anything to do with Ne, it could be vastly improved.




    Overall, the blocks that seem to do the job they're supposed to do are the Se and Ti blocks -- and this does seem to be demonstrated in the examples I've seen so far. Everything else is sort of a mixed bag, but if people give long enough answers their thought process will likely be exposed to some degree. I would like to make a questionnaire at some point but it will take some work.

  2. #2
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I did the 80Q a while back and I have been typed as both EII and LII on it.

    It's interesting you mention the Fi block being flawed and it just might be. I've had people comment on my strong, well-thought out responses to the Fi block but I may be incorporating other functions there.


    Could you please look over my 80-questions if you have time, particularly the Fi section? I would be interested in your interpretation of it.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  3. #3
    meme hotline Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    TIM
    ethic 3
    Posts
    9,083
    Mentioned
    716 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Excellent, how to condense your critique to make a better questionnaire: eliminate the vague questions, we'll talk about substitutes if useful, then test it. Quality over quantity, it doesn't necessarily have to be long.

    We can advise people to write a minimum of non-fragmentary sentences per question (my suggestion is 3) to get the necessary involvement with the matter instead.

  4. #4
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,400
    Mentioned
    325 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chae View Post
    Excellent, how to condense your critique to make a better questionnaire: eliminate the vague questions, we'll talk about substitutes if useful, then test it. Quality over quantity, it doesn't necessarily have to be long.

    We can advise people to write a minimum of non-fragmentary sentences per question (my suggestion is 3) to get the necessary involvement with the matter instead.
    I would rather just make a new one from scratch / based on the various open-ended questionnaires out there. It's not clear to me that the SSS method is really viable. I will post a new questionnaire shortly, God willing.

  5. #5
    meme hotline Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    TIM
    ethic 3
    Posts
    9,083
    Mentioned
    716 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I would rather just make a new one from scratch / based on the various open-ended questionnaires out there. It's not clear to me that the SSS method is really viable. I will post a new questionnaire shortly, God willing.
    Awesome, power to the Alpha quadra

  6. #6
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    What socionics types are more likely do endorse the 80-Q and the SSS method?
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Some people expressed interest in hearing my thoughts on the 80q questionnaire, which Joy has advocated for typing people. The questionnaire does give some good information, mainly because of how long it is. But the idea behind the questionnaire is that it is supposed to force people to use the given IM element, and people will switch to other ones depending on their type. In my opinion it does not really accomplish this in most of the questions. Many of the questions are either only vaguely related to IM or are actually related to different IM elements. Comments are in italics.
    I noticed that myself especially for the Si block. The others aren't that bad.


    What is boorishness? Does your understanding of it correlate with the generally accepted notion? How would you explain what boorishness mean to a 10 year old child? How would you explain the same to an adult who does not behave ethically?
    boorish: "rough and bad-mannered; coarse." No connection to Fi whatsoever. Fe or even FeSi.

    Have you heard about the Southern hospitality? Everything is for the guest. There is also a German hospitality - the master of the house is always right. What method is the right one? Try to evaluate without the weight of any cultural aspects, traditions, nations etc.
    This is like "FeSi or TiSe - which is better?" Nothing to do with Fi.

    What is sympathy? When do you need to express it? When is it advised not to?
    Sympathy is Fi but I'm not sure this is a great way to evaluate someone's understanding of it.

    Are there any norms of behavior in the society? Do you follow them? Do people always have to follow them? Why?
    Ti

    How do you know what attitude among people is right or wrong?
    Fi valuers do not generally care about others' attitudes. That's really more about Fe.
    What is Fi in your opinion then if not any of this?


    Shallow emotions - what does it mean? Are there any other emotions?
    Fi valuers might consider certain emotions "shallow", but that's using Fi. Seems like they got Fi and Fe backwards.

    I consider some of them shallow just fine. But my view of what shallow emotions are may differ from Fi valuers's view.


    What are right or wrong emotions?
    Not Fe.
    Why not?

  8. #8
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,400
    Mentioned
    325 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    I noticed that myself especially for the Si block. The others aren't that bad.




    What is Fi in your opinion then if not any of this?
    Fi has to do with judging the status of relationships, people's character, how people act appropriately or not in relationships, etc. A good Fi question might be "how do you know you can trust someone?" Perhaps I was a bit harsh though, the questions about hospitality and attitudes could conceivably be answered with Fi.


    Why not?
    Fe (or Te for that matter) does not generally include an idea of right and wrong. This is almost completely in the domain of the introverted irrational elements -- despite the common belief that rational elements are about shoulds or norms etc. I'm not sure if this is a classical socionics idea or more Jungian but if so it's a case where I would depart. Ti leading types in general are more likely to criticize others for correct or incorrect behavior than Fe leading types.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Fi has to do with judging the status of relationships, people's character, how people act appropriately or not in relationships, etc. A good Fi question might be "how do you know you can trust someone?" Perhaps I was a bit harsh though, the questions about hospitality and attitudes could conceivably be answered with Fi.
    Well all of the questions I quoted can be answered quite readily by judging the status of relationships, people's character, how people act appropriately or not in relationships. The norms question though can call up Fe, depending on how it's interpreted (and yes, Ti can somewhat be used for it too, sure).

    Um, "how do you know you can trust someone?", I gotta be Fi base then because I know this pretty well.


    Fe (or Te for that matter) does not generally include an idea of right and wrong. This is almost completely in the domain of the introverted irrational elements -- despite the common belief that rational elements are about shoulds or norms etc. I'm not sure if this is a classical socionics idea or more Jungian but if so it's a case where I would depart.
    No, I will definitely disagree on this - Je still judges. It just does it in a Dynamic way, not in a Static way.

    Jung's principle on this is very very very fundamental to typology.


    Ti leading types in general are more likely to criticize others for correct or incorrect behavior than Fe leading types.
    Not my experience with Fe bases. They actually do this more than I do it. And I find it quite helpful in many cases.

  10. #10
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas View Post
    Discussing about this questionnaire is more interesting than the answer itself?
    Both are interesting in their own way.


    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas View Post
    One day there were a teacher asking their students, "What is the result of the mathematics of two dogs plus two cats?"
    War!
    Eight legs
    2 non-overlapping sets
    2D + 2C. Let D = # of dogs and C = # of cats. Since two different variables you cannot directly add 2 + 2.
    A failed attempt at interbreeding

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas View Post
    So do Socionics questionnaire. There are no good or bad question, and there are no good or bad answer. Everything which you'll write as an answer, it will reflect who you are.
    The questions you don't answer are also insightful.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  11. #11
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,400
    Mentioned
    325 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas View Post
    Discussing about this questionnaire is more interesting than the answer itself?

    Parable

    One day there were a teacher asking their students, "What is the result of the mathematics of two dogs plus two cats?"

    And here is what he got from their student.
    - "Four animals"
    - "still, two dogs plus two cats."
    - "Aww, I want to adopt them."
    - "This question is a trap."
    - "Don't force me to answer it, Sir."
    - "I should ask professor of math first, I apologize."
    - "Maybe two mouse? So we can see 'Tom and Jerry kids' in real."
    - etc.

    So do Socionics questionnaire. There are no good or bad question, and there are no good or bad answer. Everything which you'll write as an answer, it will reflect who you are.
    "Everything which you'll write as an answer, it will reflect who you are."

    To some extent this is true, but it doesn't mean that some questions aren't better than others. Plus, my main point in making this thread was not (only) that the questions are bad as a whole (which is much more difficult to judge), it was to point out that their interpretations are not totally accurate, so that people don't look at the Ne block and think it has something to do with Ne.

    Still, some questions are obviously bad, like the yes or no questions and the "define the term" ones. Sure, if someone just says "Yes" or "No" to all the questions then we might guess that they are a type with low Fe, but it would still be more helpful to ask literally almost any other kind of question about themselves.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Plus, my main point in making this thread was not (only) that the questions are bad as a whole (which is much more difficult to judge), it was to point out that their interpretations are not totally accurate, so that people don't look at the Ne block and think it has something to do with Ne.
    It's funny you see the Ne block as crappy because I have that opinion of the Se block. I just find many of the Se questions to be weirdly black and white. Overall though it's okay, the answers people give to it do show some of how they treat Se information. Just the questions themselves is what I'm criticizing a bit here. I find the Si block far worse as I said above.

    Thought Ne block was pretty much Ne because I had the most trouble with that one back then when I did my 80q. It was just incredibly weird and vague questions to me for the most part. ...And later it did help me understand Ne as an IE better by trying to look at the aspects that the Ne block emphasized. (Better, well, not really, but helped me recognize it more in people etc.)

  13. #13
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wanted to do a critique like this but never really felt like taking to time to do it so thanks for saving me the effort. I'd be totally on board with someone constructing a new one and then have the rest of the forum check its accuracy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •