Chae's V.I

[Chae]

In what way or ways do you see yourself being unrealistic?
Would you say you are a constant realist?
Is it easy for you to trust others?
Do peoples ride behavior affect you? How would you handle a situation like one at work?
Can you see yourself being direct and pushy with regard to other LSE being on time?

Being realistic always has something to do with adequacy. I am unrealistic aka inadequate when it comes to my world view, I am supremely biased and get caught up in it. So I am realistic about being unrealistic.
Constant... no. I am not always consistent in my realism, although it matters to me. On the other hand... I can easily spot constant realists, I like them.

Yes and no, I second-guess naturally. But then again, relying on someone shows that there is a bond and bonds are important to me. As a rule, I trust a person when my gut and knowledge tell me I should.

Was that a typo, you meant "rude"? In that case... it can concern me, although it depends on why they are being rude, which I usually figure out. I myself can be rude, in a sense of disrespecting another person's assessment. I can use personal affronts so of course, when being target of this affront myself, it bothers me. What isn't part of a person cannot affect them. I handle such a situation at work by looking at the consequences of my reply. I am cautious because work relations should be on good terms. In severe cases, I create distance between me and the rude person.
Direct - yes, pushy - only a bit. Everything always unfolds as it should so I don't even have to steer somebody in this or that direction. Via being direct, they can and will figure it out themselves. If the LSE is tardy and that has repercussions, I'll scold them for sure though. Especially because I know that if they do it once, there's a high chance it'll happen again, with a different excuse but essentially the same faulty timing.

[Beautiful sky]

Being realistic always has something to do with adequacy. I am unrealistic aka inadequate when it comes to my world view, I am supremely biased and get caught up in it. So I am realistic about being unrealistic.
Constant... no. I am not always consistent in my realism, although it matters to me. On the other hand... I can easily spot constant realists, I like them.

Yes and no, I second-guess naturally. But then again, relying on someone shows that there is a bond and bonds are important to me. As a rule, I trust a person when my gut and knowledge tell me I should.

Was that a typo, you meant "rude"? In that case... it can concern me, although it depends on why they are being rude, which I usually figure out. I myself can be rude, in a sense of disrespecting another person's assessment. I can use personal affronts so of course, when being target of this affront myself, it bothers me. What isn't part of a person cannot affect them. I handle such a situation at work by looking at the consequences of my reply. I am cautious because work relations should be on good terms. In severe cases, I create distance between me and the rude person.
Direct - yes, pushy - only a bit. Everything always unfolds as it should so I don't even have to steer somebody in this or that direction. Via being direct, they can and will figure it out themselves. If the LSE is tardy and that has repercussions, I'll scold them for sure though. Especially because I know that if they do it once, there's a high chance it'll happen again, with a different excuse but essentially the same faulty timing.

What do you intend to achieve by scolding for ones lack of good time management?

[Chae]

What do you intend to achieve by scolding for ones lack of good time management?

I already implied this, they simply shouldn't be doing it again, time is too valuable. It's about causality: For the next occasion, they would want to make sure not to get reprimanded. That's the incentive for improving their timing which benefits all parties involved on a practical level.

[Beautiful sky]

I already implied this, they simply shouldn't be doing it again, time is too valuable. It's about causality: For the next occasion, they would want to make sure not to get reprimanded. That's the incentive for improving their timing which benefits all parties involved on a practical level.

I would say that Ni has way more value to you.