Lacking decisiveness corresponds to a strong Te-. ILI weighs pros and cons forever :-) Both negative and positive aspects of a product. Spending too much money corresponds to a weak Te+.
I think it is the other way around; the fact that IEI must do these things makes it not enjoyable. Id functions are private and sporadic. But there are, for example, lots of ILI mathematicians (TiNe), so let's not exaggerate the unusefulness of the Id functions.We both agree that we can use vital function consciously for a moment, what I meant is that we can't use it for a long time unless there is an absolute reason for it, kind of requiring the external stimulus (i.e., certain activities require one to use certain functions). In the case of Ni+Te- example, I don't think such aspects would be enjoyable for an IEI unless they MUST do these things, then they may be able to restrain for a longer time without resorting to the approach of Ni-, Ti- or other mental functions.
Well, it depends on what we mean by "pushing people". It can refer to many different kinds of behavior. SLEs don't give orders as you suggested. But they do influence people with "salesman tactics" and physical dominance.You are contradicting yourself, you said earlier that Se- is used in pushing people. How 4D Se- looks in LII?
Se- is definitely 4D in LII. They do not act "hysterically" when faced with physical threats. And just like SLI and LSE, they avoid these kinds of situations. A 4D Id function has (usually) nothing to prove for itself.
It could be Te- as well. It depends on what exactly you are referring to.No, if I actually sense naturally that reading certain books will help them achieve something (perhaps those books have helped me in the past), and I tell them categorically, then I think that would be Ni+Te- (and the categories would be created through either Ti- or Ti+).
You: "Model A doesn't have -+ signs" "your model is nothing but an alternative perspective to Model A"How? You added signs to your Model, but still using a Model A as the basis.
I: "The basic structure of Model A ... applies to Model D"
I don't claim that Model D is an alternative Model A. +/- is impossible with eight functions (if defined as in Model D and Model B).
You: "I would be something like IEI-2,3."Not really, but not fully ambiverted either. I think my weak functions are stronger, particularly Ti- (fair understanding on how concrete objects work, able to isolate the parts from something and fix it), Fe- (negative emotions, vulgar vocabulary, swearing...), Te+ (able to order, work and manipulate objects somewhat), Se- (able to understand who can benefit me or what people want from me) and Se+ (a bit pushy, understanding of certain aggressive tactics). Ni- and Fi+ is in the background (not verbalized) most of the time. Ne+ is verbalized a lot though (especially in close distance when I am feeling comfortable). Ti+ is good enough, Fe+ is not good (though tell me which function is used in the "acting"? I think I am good at acting or playing a role for a while, but not empathizing with people, feeling the emotions of other people and understanding social navigation). I would be something like IEI-8,5. Do you find any correlation between your subtype system to DCNH? (and Big Five traits, for example, I am incredibly neurotic and feel that I use weak functions all the time)
Both ILE and IEI seem to have vulgar vocabulary. And IEE and ILI don't. This is probably related to a verbal ("valued") and weak Se- in ILE and IEI. I think this is a way of projecting toughness.
I don't agree with your interpretation of Se- and Se+. Fe- is not about negative emotions. It's about both positive and negative aspects of ETHICS of emotions.
Fe+ is about acting, i.e. playing with emotions, or speculating about relationships etc. EIE's and IEI's Fe+ is definitely strong. Hence, your Ti+ is weak. SLE is your dual!
He is most likely ENTp / ILE. He is absolutely not IEE.I do love Ne humor, but I don't understand the distinction between ENTp's humor and ENFp's humor. For example, I really love Bill Maher's humor (see this video). Is he ENTp or ENFp?
Ne- humor is black and bizarre.
Ne+ humor is provocative. Russel Brand is a good example.
No, I meant that LIIs are usually not good at facial expressions. LII's Fe- is 1D, vital... i.e. the Suggestive function.For this reason, LII's and LII's Fe- would be 2D? (because they seem to have better facial expressions)



Reply With Quote