VI & a Questionnaire

[Sol]

Fwiw I was typed FiNe by them too and I am absolutely not EII

Who typed you with high assurance to EII and by what video?
The only video I saw with you was made by Aaron and it was terrible as instead of normal light (which was recommended you beforhand) it had significantly shadowed face. That made so much problem to type you that the only thing I was sure was F type, if I recall it correctly. While typing without video is not serious at all as ~half of used typing data is absent..
That people often have different opinions about types is not new. Average match is <20% ! Your own opinion about own type was said is LII what is wrong, taking into account your emotionality. When you type you do it similarly bad from pov of others, - you say wrong types, while having much better typing data than you gave about yourself.

[Persephone]

Who typed you with high assurance to EII and by what video?
The only video I saw with you was made by Aaron and it was terrible as instead of normal light (which was recommended you beforhand) it had significantly shadowed face. That made so much problem to type you that the only thing I was sure was F type, if I recall it correctly. While typing without video is not serious at all as ~half of used typing data is absent..
That people often have different opinions about types is not new. Average match is <20% ! Your own opinion about own type was said is LII what is wrong, taking into account your emotionality. When you type you do it similarly bad from pov of others, - you say wrong types, while having much better typing data than you gave about yourself.

Either you try to listen to what people say or at least read correctly or just stfu. I never typed myself as LII so I don't type anyone from this pov. The video has a couple of years before I knew about your miserable existence and recommendations. Get a glass of vodka and leave the forumites in peace.

[Sol]

I don't know about their correlation with socionics, but I think what they are doing is pretty interesting, anyway

As Socionics has internal correlation <20% in average they can't be to much worse. Their EII and ESI are among possible, at least.

[summerprincess]

There was video with her to exclude IEI. But if you compare her with herself and taking into account your type is most probably EII, then your version can be understood as EII and ESI are among most possible for her.

I believe when like 90% of the forum including myself think that I am IEI there is a higher chance of me being IEI than EII. Just probability-wise

[darya]

I'll post one more video that I had made for cognitive types (they typed me FiNe in their system). I'm much more myself here..I'm not keeping this up long...

I would definitely type you FiNe based on this video, you don't seem Fe ego at all.

[Persephone]

When we talked in chat you said that was typed to LII by MBTI "professionals" and that trust to that typing because they are professionals. Hence you are lieing here or don't remember what you did. In chat I said that LII is doubtful and then you gave me the link to your lame made video by Aaron to type you. What was then is said above.

I was typed NiTe in MBTI and nobody was forcing you to watch my lame video. Unless you did not get the purpose of it, it was a live interaction above all, I wasn't prepared, was unaware of questions, did not know there would be records and no I won't redo any other video on purpose.

I see I've messed 2 different situations - "cognitive types" site and typing on this forum, so this partly excuses your reaction. But if you gave them similar shit instead of good video, then your criticism is not appropriate.
Those recommendations are reasonable and could to make your miserable existence better, as you may incorrectly think about own type, what is not rare. Also having 20% average match and <50% between anyone, others from pov of anyone have low typing skills, so a single case when someone typed you wrongly means not much, similarly is with your opinion about own type. While EII version is partly correct to call it absolutely wrong.

What a wonderful edit, thankyou. Good that at least you acknowledge you are messing up. Actually let me tell you an incredible secret, you are messing up like constantly.

Stop to believe in Hithler's propaganda, the Hithler with whom your ancestors came with war to us (came more of them, than took part in so called "resistance") and have gotten nice collective graves here, near the graves of your idiotic ancestors which came 100 years befor with Napoleon. The reality is lesser important for you than worshiping to Hithler's ideas, but I notice you that I drunk vodka only 2 times in the life as prefer vine and get alcohol lesser than most frenchs, including probably you.
Until those forumites believe in bs, act unreasonable or need for help there are no reasons to "leave them in peace".

Dude you have no clue about my ancestors so relax, I don't see what this has to do with any typing arguments with/for people and especially here in Bird's thread. Smoke weed if you don't like vodka, maybe it will get you a bit less rigid.

[Beautiful sky]

Who typed you with high assurance to EII and by what video?
The only video I saw with you was made by Aaron and it was terrible as instead of normal light (which was recommended you beforhand) it had significantly shadowed face. That made so much problem to type you that the only thing I was sure was F type, if I recall it correctly. While typing without video is not serious at all as ~half of used typing data is absent..
That people often have different opinions about types is not new. Average match is <20% ! Your own opinion about own type was said is LII what is wrong, taking into account your emotionality. When you type you do it similarly bad from pov of others, - you say wrong types, while having much better typing data than you gave about yourself.

Hi Sol

How you doin?

I was thinking I help you understand Fi and Ni a bit more so why don't we work on it together. What do you say. I think it could benefit your typing skills in writing form a lot more

[maniac]

Hi Sol

How you doin?

I was thinking I help you understand Fi and Ni a bit more so why don't we work on it together. What do you say. I think it could benefit your typing skills in writing form a lot more

[Sol]

From this list I'd say I like the ESE's significantly more than the EIE's, but I like the ILI's more than the SLI's. The EIE's in this list really really bother me for some reason.

Based on alpha and beta your result is closer to EII, but contradictions are meaningful. This may mean the type other than E*I or the method works not good.

Between LSE vs LIE men bloggers which type you perceive as more personally comfort ?
Among males, you have general impression as personally more interesting and intruguing for: E or I, S or N, T or F types ?

[Sol]

Maybe I'm just weird.

The method has issues: IR normally work in IRL close informal contact, preferably when you know a human more than several minutes. Also some possibility for other type besides E*I.

Well I can say easily I prefer extroverts over introverts. Thinking over feeling, generally. I mean there are times when I like to talk to feeler types more. I guess both are interesting in their own way, but feeler types can get annoying to me sometimes.

May you notice pairs of types (by their dominant function) with most friendly liking and soul attraction for you?

I don't know about S or N as much

Like you noticed more interest to E types, similarly you may approximate for other dichotomies. It's not needed to do soon, but is important to understand your own type. By using my typings or of someone else.

[Sol]

Kind of difficult, but generally speaking
Te>Ti
Fi>Fe
Ni>Ne
Si>Se

Is there vertical order? So among 8 pairs you prefer Ti dominant pair (by the criterion above) on 2nd place among all 8 pairs, and Si dominant on 7th place?

But I was thinking (going by the blogger list), if I were to imagine the groups in the blogger list belonging to each quadra together occupying their own quadra house, and if I were standing in front of these four houses and had to choose which one I would stay at, I would gravitate to Alpha or Delta, and it would be an automatic reaction to not go to Beta or Gamma. I suppose it's because Alpha and Delta seem softer and more welcoming to me. Like something/ or some people I could live with.

Quadras may be sorted. Between alpha and delta, gamma and beta is the difference in friendly liking.

[Sol]

No, sorry. I should have said there wasn't. It was just easier for me to choose between the two thinking types, two feeling types etc.

The initial idea was to find pairs with same dominant function (ILE-IEE, SEI-SLI, etc), which give the "most friendly liking and soul attraction for you". To sort these 8 pairs, like previously was done with 16 types - would be even better.

Most of the SEE's seemed more serious to me which is why I prefer them to the IEE's, but I would be more comfortable to be in the same vicinity as the IEE's, probably.

you also said that prefer ILI instead of SLI

Because I don't think life is about what you own or how much you have.

Se has philosophy of fight. They are not just materialistic. For Se valued what they have is _also_ a "medal", a symbol of win in life (eugenics) and symbol of blessing from High power (God, for example). To get it they could do anything, expressing all their best traits, including spiritual.

[Sol]

IDK...The thing with 'most friendly liking' is some people I find interesting or have friendly liking for, but I don't think they would be long term good for me. It's the people that I find boring that I find the most grounding

Duals (and close) give most friendly liking and soul attraction (of opposite sex, especially). Generally they should not be perceived as boring. They harmonize and inspire your spirit during IRL communication, - you feel good, they are pleasant, trusty and easy to deal with.
Dominant functions types pairs by most of this criterion were interesting.

[draon9]

Infj