Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: DCNH and its dichotomies

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,527
    Mentioned
    361 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have not spent enough time with DCNH to have a grasp of it; I have given it overviews a couple of times waiting for something to jump out at me and be enough to pull me back in and nothing did. So its been in my "later" pile for awhile. When skimming the definitions it seems I always seem to fit into at least two while "possibly" being the other two as well...

    I am IEE and probably Ne subtype, 1w2, sx/so (the latter according the sum of the actual given definitions, though not the stereotypical sometimes dramatized view of it). So I wonder if that info tells you which DCNH is more probable for me??

    But just reading what you wrote here, Creative Subtype stands out by far the most for me. I am this way in my work and in conversation. Once I am "on", that is - because between projects and focus, and I can be very scattered. I get completely focused on what I am doing in a project or who I am talking to - and I am not even seeing other things at ALL, or I am effortlessly completely ignoring distractions after a glance because my focus on the thing at hand requires it. And I like the zen-feeling I have being completely absorbed in the thing I am absorbed in. Or focusing on the one person, for that matter. I consider a social event to have been a "good" one, and rewarding/fulfilling, only if I have had a chance for 1:1 conversations, and a few of these is great - where I am completely focusing on one person, even if lots of other people are around us at the time -- we are in a timeless bubble for the conversation. And the occasion is one I consider unrewarding and disappointing if there has been none of that. I always then feel the time has been more "real" because I have truly gotten to know someone better - a bit of who they really are. That focus and that preference when socializing is pretty much always true of me. So I'm asking: In your opinion, does that alone put me into the "Creative" group??
    ________________

    I am trying to read this article. I am as far as 2.1, and hope to get back to it later. It really looks like with the dichtonomies I am "contact, initial, ignoring - creative subtype (C);" and my SLI husband, probably: "distant, initial, connecting - harmonizing subtype (H)". Not really final on that though, as I do not feel I have a grasp of the whole yet...

    _______________
    ...oh, and according to section 2.2, this is consistent as my strengthens C and my SLI-husband's strengthens H...
    Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 06-20-2016 at 05:54 PM.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •