A new Perspective on Dichotomies in Socionics - Pyramid Diagrams, Draft

[QuickTwist]

@sindri,

I have been debating my type and have some info on where I would classify myself.

From LII I am:

Intuitive
Democratic
Strategic
Farsighted
Judicious
Results
Asking


From LSI I am:

Declaring

For both I can't decide:

Positivist/Negativist

Gereral traits I share with both:

Introvert
Merry
Rational
Logical

General traits I am not:

Emotivest

So all the traits I have are:

Introvert
Intuitive
Logical
Rational

Static
Yielding
Democratic
Strategic
Constructivist
Farsighted

Merry
Judicious
Results

Declaring

And I cannot decide:

Positivist/Negativist


What would that make me?

[Lao Tzunami]

So all the traits I have are:

Introvert	Static	Constructivist	Results
Intuitive	Yielding	Farsighted	Declaring
Logical	Democratic	Merry	Positivist / Negativist
Rational	Strategic	Judicious

What would that make me?

Based on these dichotomies, you are most likely LII
QuickTwist Pyramid Analysis.png
Here are your relative dichotomies scores.

0	Introvert		+2	Static		-2	Constructivist		0	Results
+2	Intuitive		-2	Yielding		0	Farsighted		-4	Declaring
0	Logical		0	Democratic		0	Merry		+1	Negativist
0	Rational		+4	Strategic		+2	Judicious

The red represents the least harmonious. If you can prove they are wrong and changed them to their opposite, you will have 100% score of LII.

If you are certain you are have introverted logic as your base function, that resolves yielding and constructivist, leaving "declaring" as the only contradiction to LII.

My father is LII. One his sayings that demonstrates emotivism is "People rarely change their minds due to a good argument. You can prove them wrong but they will still not agree with you. The best way to change someone's mind is by being a friend." I personally would classify him as a declared because he does not like being interupted and he want enough time to make his point, but when he is teaching, he definitely uses the Socratic method. I've heard that asking/declaring isn't good for typing anyway. He definitely is obstinate, and my impression is the older he has gotten, the more time he has had to think out his own opinion and be certain of it. He's told me he wasn't like that when he was young. He is a negativist because he believes that any problems that are possible will happen. This may also be because he is a database administrator and given enough time, any error in computer code will happen. He is also very aware when a movie is presenting a philosophy he believes is false. Hope this gives you some ideas for yourself.

And of course, you could look up the following descriptions of functions and information elements. All the elements are hyperlinked, the number is the function
LII: 2Ne 4Se 6Si 8Ni
LSI 2Se 4Ne 6Ni 8Si