View Poll Results: type of Ben Shapiro?

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    1 3.57%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    0 0%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    1 3.57%
  • LII (INTj)

    1 3.57%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    0 0%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    0 0%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    4 14.29%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    2 7.14%
  • ILI (INTp)

    4 14.29%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    11 39.29%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    1 3.57%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    0 0%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    1 3.57%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    6 21.43%
  • EII (INFj)

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 74 of 74

Thread: Ben Shapiro

  1. #41
    a two horned unicorn renegade Nihilist 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Logical supermacy torturing So(u)ls
    TIM
    ILE-C-7 5-stoolchart
    Posts
    4,369
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HERO View Post

    Deserving something. Interesting statement. Does "deserve" in the end only mean interactional determinism with the world? This claim implies stilting the statement towards personally beneficial end result.

    From what I gather is that it contains lots of elements of contradiction that never truly raises to a surface just by starting from group cohesion.
    Quote Originally Posted by Groucho Marx
    I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.


    Due to Fi PoLR do not send PM's, please. 50/50 likelihood to get a reply if I'm going to even read your messages. Let's keep things public.

  2. #42

    Default

    gamma NT

  3. #43
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BLEGGGH lol He's not a LIE; he's a LSE, in the same vein as someone like O' Reilly.

    He's definitely a Te lead (albeit a cherry picking, intellectually dishonest one), but generally speaking, if one reveres the past and insists on adhering to anti-progressive, traditional vales, they are more likely to be a Si user with weaker Ne intuition because their grasp of futuristic possibilities (read: the unknown) are more so rooted in fear and a discomforting uncertainty, and thus there is a preference for upholding what is familiar, and moreover, has been idealized by way of subjective sense impressions. Clearly, Shapiro preferences his sensing over his intuition when he is prophesying doom and gloom about Western cultural values in favor of how we've done things in the past.

    LIEs are more inclined towards optimism about future prospects, in that we are more secure in our ability to innovate effective solutions to meet future oriented concerns, implications, consequences, etc.... by way of perceiving the big picture and how the past/present/future exist along a continuum of readily beheld patterns and interlocking systems that will always provide the best answer. We're more inclined to bypass immediate sensory details in favor of what we have confidently conceptualized and intend to carry out, hence the oft ascribed "visionary" label (given to intuitives). That ain't Shapiro, he traffics in fear of the future if we don't adhere to present and past based facts, values, etc.... BLEGGGGGH.

    Oh, and I have receipts:

    1.)




    @42:46 "Hey Ben, what is your Myers-Briggs type?"

    Ben Shapiro responds, "I can't remember, what is Myers-Briggs? Is this the introvert thing? I'll have to look it up real fast. Yeah yeah, the free personality test. You know I, I did it at one point and I, I cannot remember for the life of me which one, which type I am, I have to look up the types and I'd probably remember so I believe that there are, let's see, so I know I was an extrovert. I know that in terms of sensing versus intuition, I think I was a sensing versus intuition; I believe that when it came to making decisions, I was thinking versus feeling, and when it came to prefer judging versus perceiving I believed that I was a judging, so I was either an ESTJ or an ENTJ I believe, so that's for what, for whatever that's worth that's what I think I was anyway I can't remember, to be frank with you."
    2.) Readily (read: creepily) found among Filatova's LSE portraits in a rather cut and dry case > enjoy the closeup!


  4. #44
    Olimpia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    So/Sx Introvert
    Posts
    7,948
    Mentioned
    695 Post(s)
    Tagged
    8 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    BLEGGGH lol He's not a LIE; he's a LSE, in the same vein as someone like O' Reilly.

    He's definitely a Te lead (albeit a cherry picking, intellectually dishonest one), but generally speaking, if one reveres the past and insists on adhering to anti-progressive, traditional vales, they are more likely to be a Si user with weaker Ne intuition because their grasp of futuristic possibilities (read: the unknown) are more so rooted in fear and a discomforting uncertainty, and thus there is a preference for upholding what is familiar, and moreover, has been idealized by way of subjective sense impressions. Clearly, Shapiro preferences his sensing over his intuition when he is prophesying doom and gloom about Western cultural values in favor of how we've done things in the past.

    LIEs are more inclined towards optimism about future prospects, in that we are more secure in our ability to innovate effective solutions to meet future oriented concerns, implications, consequences, etc.... by way of perceiving the big picture and how the past/present/future exist along a continuum of readily beheld patterns and interlocking systems that will always provide the best answer. We're more inclined to bypass immediate sensory details in favor of what we have confidently conceptualized and intend to carry out, hence the oft ascribed "visionary" label (given to intuitives). That ain't Shapiro, he traffics in fear of the future if we don't adhere to present and past based facts, values, etc.... BLEGGGGGH.

    Oh, and I have receipts:

    1.)



    2.) Readily (read: creepily) found among Filatova's LSE portraits in a rather cut and dry case > enjoy the closeup!

    Bill O'Reilly has clearly much more force and pressure behind his angry antics, which is a sign of 4D Se. Ben Shapiro seems rather gentle and soft in comparison. With Bill, you'd get the impression he would bash your head in if he could. With Ben, not really. There is no sense of physical threat emanating from him at all.

    What you are pointing out there is the strong connection to Type 6 which Si ego types typically possess. Yes, that often makes them more inclined to traditionalism and consersativism (coupled with their weak intuition), but that doesn't mean that just because someone is a conservative, that they must be Si ego (or Se ego for that matter).

    As a whole, Rationals tend to lean towards conservatism, and Irrationals tend to be more "open-minded" towards in-coming information and phenomena on average, but it is not a rule; there are liberals and conservatives of every type and in every Quadra out there. Hence I find typing Ben as LSE just because of his conservatism rather simplistic.
    New Youtube [x] Get Typed! [x]
    Celebs [x] Theory [x] Tumblr [x]

    *********** 21-04-19:
    "Looks like a mystic that just arrived to battle and staring out at the battle, ready to unleash"



  5. #45
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Interior of a T-34
    Posts
    2,438
    Mentioned
    129 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Watching him get DESTROYED in that interview with Andrew Neil (who seems SLI by my guess, supervision maybe?) was very entertaining.

  6. #46

    Default

    All Te leads are inclined to cherry pick the data blocks that neatly fit into their worldview and apply them in a brute force manner when debating, we just have a tendency to notice and be bothered by it more when it's coming from someone diametrically opposed to our own worldview.

    btw I like that Rogan interview where he fulmbles to explain his religious opposition to gay marriage. He basically flips the script and tries to use religion and morality to destroy logic. Just funny because it's a good example of how even the most logical types can be prone to cherry picking and resorting to moralistic fallacies when it suits their arguments.

  7. #47
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olimpia View Post
    Bill O'Reilly has clearly much more force and pressure behind his angry antics, which is a sign of 4D Se. Ben Shapiro seems rather gentle and soft in comparison. With Bill, you'd get the impression he would bash your head in if he could. With Ben, not really. There is no sense of physical threat emanating from him at all.
    First off, it seems to me that you're conflating a lack of "force and pressure" (which Shapiro does manifest) with his high, nasal, weaselly ass voice--which most certainly removes a fair amount of gravitas from his presentation though that has nothing to do with the energetic manifestation of his "will," as evidenced by his push back below:



    I can palpably detect the energy he's dispensing, even if I'm not particularly "impressed," "moved," "intimidated," or whatever by it. Moreover, I think O'Reilly is an enneagram 8 or definitely has it in his tritype, which would mean that he's more comfortable standing in his anger and exerting force/pressure. There are a fair amount of LSE enneagram 1s, for example, who definitely sublimate their anger and any accompanying "volitional will"--I've encountered Te leads who can come off kinda hard, standoffish and aggressive and those who seem more like stiff, uptight, robotic nerds (a la Shapiro).

    Furthermore, I have 2D Se and yet I rage harder than anything I've ever witnessed from O'Reilly. Kobe Bryant is a LIE with low D Se and yet he's one of the best basketball players of all time, a sport dominated by Se leads/creatives. Why? Because he has an ungodly work ethic and through experience, has grown to a high level of Se competence, even if not blessed with natural Se facility, which are two different things.

    Quote Originally Posted by Olimpia View Post
    What you are pointing out there is the strong connection to Type 6 which Si ego types typically possess. Yes, that often makes them more inclined to traditionalism and consersativism (coupled with their weak intuition), but that doesn't mean that just because someone is a conservative, that they must be Si ego (or Se ego for that matter).
    The thing is, I rely on qualifiers like "more" or "less" to add degree, texture and nuance to my statements; I said that, as a Si > Ne user, he'd more likely be inclined towards a "traditional" (catalogued/entrenched/preferred sense based impressions of past experiences) worldview, which should be understood contextually > what's considered to be traditional in Sweden [socially, culturally, politically] differs to what that may encompass in Russia.

    Quote Originally Posted by Olimpia View Post
    As a whole, Rationals tend to lean towards conservatism, and Irrationals tend to be more "open-minded" towards in-coming information and phenomena on average, but it is not a rule; there are liberals and conservatives of every type and in every Quadra out there. Hence I find typing Ben as LSE just because of his conservatism rather simplistic.
    What's "simplistic" is you ignoring the additional data I provided where he corroborated his typing as a LSE and also where he remarkably "VIs" as a LSE, according to an empirical method > testing and typing thousands of people with such a high degree of accuracy that readily observable phenotypical patterns manifest, subsequently forming an additional rubric and criteria by which to assess one's type (though not with 100% neatness, considering the breadth of human phenotypical diversity). Other typology systems like DaveSuperPowers have observed and recorded a similar phenomenon, only endowing this particular brand of "VI" with more credulity.

  8. #48
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII could be right

  9. #49
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default



    heres the full interview, and yeah the interviewer seems SLI

  10. #50
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,859
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post


    heres the full interview, and yeah the interviewer seems SLI
    If the interviewer is SLI that could potentially confirm Ben for LIE because he does look like he is being supervised in the interview.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  11. #51
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
    If the interviewer is SLI that could potentially confirm Ben for LIE because he does look like he is being supervised in the interview.
    just cuz he got rekt in an interview doesnt mean he is being supervised on Si

  12. #52
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
    If the interviewer is SLI that could potentially confirm Ben for LIE because he does look like he is being supervised in the interview.
    do you also think that Ben Shapiro supervises all those people that he DESTROYS? lol

  13. #53
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,859
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    just cuz he got rekt in an interview doesnt mean he is being supervised on Si
    I know, I am just speculating, he might be LII. I just always leaned towards LIE in general before the interview and I still lean towards him being LIE even if the interviewer is not SLI.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    do you also think that Ben Shapiro supervises all those people that he DESTROYS? lol
    Of course not lol.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  14. #54
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    This is almost exactly what I hate about modern politics. Ben has tell the guy he's "on the left" just because he questions his stance on abortion as very extreme. And Ben responds to the 6 week abortion thing by saying human life exists at conception, implying the 6 weeks is even a compromise for him. And then Ben goes on to say BBC is biased?

    My thought becomes - doesn't Ben realize his own extremism is causing these stupid political divisions? Heh, and then I see the interviewer asking that and Ben taking offense and proving his point so well. Love how he ends with an angry Ben by saying "Thank you for your time and showing that anger is not part of American political discourse." I love that interviewer.

    So can we all agree that Ben has a serious lack of self-awareness or introspection of the effect of his own political involvements at least? regardless of type. Cause this has always been my problem with him and if he is say LIE and I am ILI, I would have a difficult time getting along with him, whereas I usually get along really well with LIEs. so yeah.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    heres the full interview, and yeah the interviewer seems SLI
    He could be ILI too; that interview was almost crafted as a play on Ben's lack of self-awareness and an interplay of extremes in American political discourse.
    Androgynous Robot Dreamer - Not really human, but good at pretending.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    blame the merry quadras

  15. #55
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It would be particularly enlightening to have those arguing in favor of LIE to show where he uses strong Ni. I suspect I'll be waiting forever.

  16. #56
    Haikus silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    4,753
    Mentioned
    413 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    BLEGGGH lol He's not a LIE; he's a LSE, in the same vein as someone like O' Reilly.
    Shapiro does sound like he is Si/Ne valuing in the debates.

    Him seeing people in terms of care-providers or care-receivers is similar to what is written about "Caring-Childlike" types, but does not speak to "Aggressor-Victim":
    Shapiro--"Having children truly ends adolescence. We are all either parents or children: responsibility-takers or those who demand from others."

  17. #57
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post


    He could be ILI too; that interview was almost crafted as a play on Ben's lack of self-awareness and an interplay of extremes in American political discourse.
    herpderp all smart ppl are intuitive

  18. #58
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No. But intuitives are better at seeing connections between things. It's the essence of intuition. Sorry it butthurts you.
    Androgynous Robot Dreamer - Not really human, but good at pretending.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    blame the merry quadras

  19. #59
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTP 7w8
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post
    No. But intuitives are better at seeing connections between things. It's the essence of intuition. Sorry it butthurts you.
    No thats not necessarily true baby

  20. #60
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Obviously nothing is "necessarily" true with this stuff. But if in terms of the dichotomy, intuitives don't have strength in intuition and sensors in sensing, then why bother even responding to me? Especially when I was just making a point that he could also be a strong intuitive type, not that he is.

    What is even your issue here?
    Androgynous Robot Dreamer - Not really human, but good at pretending.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    blame the merry quadras

  21. #61
    Kill4Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    TIM
    SLE-Ti 8w7 so/sp
    Posts
    2,308
    Mentioned
    227 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Shapiro is definitely not LIE. Said typing reeks of amateur hour.

  22. #62

    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    367
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Channeling Joaquin Phoenix via SLI.

  23. #63
    ragnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    638
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    He seems quite rounded and difficult to type, my best guess for a socionics profile is highly intelligent ST of some kind. I think I can detect a comparatively weak Ni compensated for by an exceptional ability to process concrete information.
    Greetings, ragnar
    ILI knowledge-seeker

  24. #64
    Alomoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    TIM
    LIE ENTj
    Posts
    481
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You want me to explain the difference? I explained it simply in an unrelated discord. Shapiro argues emotionally with a backing of logic. It's unique that such a person has a master of Fe. Here's how I'd critique that song. I don't like it. Done. Streamlined for all that. If I said why I didn't like it? I don't like rap. If I said why I don't like rap? I'd clarify, I like some rap, but not that rap. There's different kinds of rap, that's the one I dislike. You could keep asking why, and you'll get a similarly terrible answer. It's as if I don't have any internal logic to back up what I just said.

    However, if you want me to explain it well, I'd do a ton of preparation, and become Ben Shapiro's cousin for a while. Retreat into my hut, actually listen to the music. Then I'd say it's actually not bad. Bass line in the soprano, melody in the bass. Flipped it. Ah. I like a nice sonorous sound to my music. It's good. Really good. See, the words mean nothing to me, it's everything else. I could honestly agree with him about the lyrics though, they probably suck.

    I'll look. This isn't Drake speaking about himself. This is an example of him talking as if he's someone else. Nice Fi polr against an Fi user, Drake. I mean, it's nothing personal, I suck at figuring out how to help people in crisis. Give me a crying woman, and you'll get a crying me. Not really, but that's essentially what happened once between me and my mom. She says something incredibly depressing, I try and work it out. Then I solve it. She says no I won't do that. I break down. All's good now, we're a lot more ready to communicate with each other now and actually do indeed listen to each other.

    For fun, I'd love for someone who knows Ben Shapiro to ask him to explain why Yee is a well respected meme.
    Figured it out. LIE. I'm extraverted, which is incredibly counter intuitive for a person who doesn't tend to go out much. Don't know how often I'll be on, but don't expect me to respond often. Only option I'm willing to debate is Si vs Ni right now. Mission accomplished.

  25. #65
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,859
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    That awkward moment when Trump is more morally sound and less war hungry than Ben Shapiro:



    2D HA of a LIE or 4D demo of a LSE?
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  26. #66
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,720
    Mentioned
    240 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Something utterly devoid of Ni.
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  27. #67

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,350
    Mentioned
    933 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    Something utterly devoid of Ni.
    yep. that black fry on his head will not save him from cosmic rays
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  28. #68
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Shapiro being utterly "supervised" by an actual strong Ni user (ILI-Te).

  29. #69
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ni-devaluing EXTx type.

    Wouldn't take his professed statements too seriously. Guys like this are little more than paid actors for the kabuki theatre.

  30. #70
    a two horned unicorn renegade Nihilist 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Logical supermacy torturing So(u)ls
    TIM
    ILE-C-7 5-stoolchart
    Posts
    4,369
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    He has accentuated logic. The way he follows society points towards delta or beta. Does not talk in general terms. He is very factually detailed.

    Basically LSE with Si in lesser focus fits very well (much better than LIE):
    http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.p...ile_by_Gulenko
    Quote Originally Posted by Groucho Marx
    I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.


    Due to Fi PoLR do not send PM's, please. 50/50 likelihood to get a reply if I'm going to even read your messages. Let's keep things public.

  31. #71

    Default

    He's kind of like Crowder, if Crowder gained an extra 15 to 20 IQ points.

  32. #72
    soundofconfusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    158
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think he's a LIE with a normalising subtype (DCNH) . it seems that his Ti function is accentuated, making him very pedantic and sure of his views. for comparsion: jordan peterson and sam harris are imo LIE with a creative subtype.

  33. #73
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    I think he's a LIE with a normalising subtype (DCNH).
    Where is the 3D Ni and 4D Ne in Shapiro? Point it out.

  34. #74
    a two horned unicorn renegade Nihilist 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Logical supermacy torturing So(u)ls
    TIM
    ILE-C-7 5-stoolchart
    Posts
    4,369
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Shapiro and Jordan Peterson are really bridging the gap between super egos. It is like dialectical algorithmic types are predisposed of being publicly intellectual debaters/critics.
    Quote Originally Posted by Groucho Marx
    I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.


    Due to Fi PoLR do not send PM's, please. 50/50 likelihood to get a reply if I'm going to even read your messages. Let's keep things public.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •