--
--
Last edited by Nocturne; 11-28-2018 at 05:12 PM.
From the video: ESTj (LSE) or ISTj (LSI). Definitely leaning towards ESTj. Good video. It's pretty informative.
Edit: as i watch more, LSE is obvious.
Last edited by Contra; 02-17-2016 at 06:59 AM.
LSI
Strange. I usually get some sort of Feeling type, lol.
anyone else?
Actually, nope. I was typed ESE on another site. Filled out this same questionnaire. SOME stuff I even copied and pasted. I mostly just re-answered most of the questions, though, because I was way too lazy to copy and paste my replies.
BUT, I had no video there. Just the questionnaire.
Consider the following. Free yourself from the effects of your environment, drop all guards, think deep, and imagine a time, real or imaginary, a vision, a scene, of yourself, where in that moment you can say, "this me, this is the real me." What is that vision?
That's deep, man....
I don't know. Lol. Besides, it's not about who you CAN be, you can do anything you want, but it's pretty cool to know how your brain processes info.
What's your opinion on my type? Especially now that I've provided a video?
Traffic is slow on this site.
NEED MOAR OPINIONS PLS.
Well, for comparative analysis... You were repeatedly told ESE, which is Fe-Si. Contra suggests LSE. The Role+Creative, which is a common display around strangers, for LSE is Fe-Si.
He mentioned you working in the barn as a "this is me in my own skin," so to speak. The work routine is Te.
Mine, on the other hand, is picking up the lost and broken, which is Fi.
Lol
LSE wants to be free to make stuff work well in the social sphere, and to have their personal relationships taken care of in return, without anyone holding negative aspects of their past over their head.
EII wants to be free to see to the potentials to create positive relationships in the social sphere, and to have their personal lives to work well, without anyone holding their occasional forcefulness over their head.
Well, to give him some credit: while bonding is common to all people it's generally seen as something carried out through Fi. I think, generally, bonding (whether it's with animals or people) is something that Fi valuers actively carry out and care about while Fe egos might be relatively indifferent to it and let it happen naturally. Or I think of bonding with Fe types as something that is more group oriented while Fi is focused on the relationship itself. As a very, very general rule Fe relates to emotional atmosphere whereas Fi relates to individual relationships. If you are LSE, you'd highly value building deep/strong relationships with people but you wouldn't feel you that you were very good at it. You'd also show a lot of Fe (emotional expression, liveliness) when you are first getting to know people but you'd cut it out and get more serious as the relationship became less superficial. If you are LSI, you'd be relatively stolid but you'd really value those who can provide a lively emotional atmosphere for you to sort of "let-go" under and be more lively. You'd probably be decent in building deep relationships but somewhat indifferent and uncertain about it, and I'd expect it would kind of irritate you when people try to get too close too soon.
Interesting! I do get quite irritated and uncomfortable when people move "too fast" with relationships.
In fact it's safe to say that I really don't like "clingy" people. I really need my space.
Like I said, I got typed ESE elsewhere VERY religiously. I have no idea where they got that. I'm never in a state of constant emotional expressiveness like Fe egos apparently are.
Contra much better at saying Ti stuff than I am lol
Maybe @Contra can take the concept and turn it into something that makes a little more sense lol. Tbh, all the types are blurring back into singularity for me, so I'm losing the ability to make distinguishments, as everything seems to be saying the same thing with different word choices lol.
ESTP (SLE)
less probable ESFP
You may look at my examples of types to check are INTP or INFP, ISTP or ISFP give you more soul comfort. For getting impressions it needs for >=3 examples for a type (examples of opposite sex are better for this) and for >=2 videos from channels of that examples.
The way you talk about how productivity and work are important for you make me think you're Te ego type.
You also describe yourself as being quite serious and you do seem like a serious type in a socionics sense too, so I think it puts you out of alpha and beta quadra and puts you into Fi+Te valuers gamma or delta.
You mentioned that for example acting is hard for you, you didn't say it exactly, but according to what you had said before, I think it is hard for you to step out of your own persona and be someone else, which also suggests Te+Fi valuing.
I have a few questions for you; do you find it hard to be the leader? To be the one who forces others to do things they might find unpleasant, or you don't mind doing it when it is important for the project you currently work on?
Or are you more of a type who rather just does it herself and you don't think about forcing others to do anything?
Last edited by huiheiwufhawriuhg; 02-18-2016 at 07:16 PM.
Because I came off as "emotional."
well, I may have seemed like that because the guy who typed me ESE at first LITERALLY just went off of the fact he "didn't like me" without first even speaking to me. I then told him that I didn't care about his impression and that he needed to show me an actual source comparing my behavior to Fe. When you make such a hostile claim, you should at least back it up.
Though, I have always assumed I was a Feeling type of some sort. Definitely not a Fe dominant, though. Personally, I assumed I was ISFj. If I was a Thinking type, probably ISTp or ISTj.
LSE-Si. If you are Si sub-type (emphasis on Creative function), your Creative (Si), Role (Fe), Dual-seeking (Fi) and Demonstrative (Se) functions are accentuated, hence why you might have self-identified as a MBTI F type.
I meant to respond to this thread before you removed your video. You visually remind me a lot of @SisOfNight. I am not convinced that VI is reliable though and you do so seem like a logical type to me.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Oh?
Anyhow, @Nocturne strikes me as Enneagram Type 4.
Apart from her profile set-up and stereotypically Type 4 interests like Goth etc, this one statement gives it away pretty easily:Following that, she can (most likely) only be a type with strong Fi. Type 4s who are Logical types are close to non-existent.Envious. Maybe kinda bummed out. I wanna be special and be good at stuff, too!
This sounds like Fi valuing (in a "Gamma way"):This sounds like the definition of Te:My people are my friends. They're weird like me, we get along and can talk and hang out easily. It's also my family, whom I hold close. Strangers are those I don't know and have no desire to meet with personally. Once I'm close with someone, they never really become a true stranger. (...) People don't change. Seriously. People are always who they are.And this sounds like Se valuing/Creative:Logic is the most efficient way to do something with minimal damage.Social blindspot:I kind of see brute force as a strategy of attack. Words don't usually do much to people. I took martial arts, of course I can use them. It's justified when force is necessary and someone comes at you with harmful intentions. (...) I don't like upsetting people when it's not necessary. But oftentimes, I yell, get harsh, and even get violent. I'll protect myself at all costs. No one screws with me. No one. (...) Anyone can be strong. You have to have the will to not give up. Never stop fighting. The signs of a strong person is just someone who does what I just said. They push on despite everything pushing them back. The core of force is willpower and confidence. People listen to others who demonstrate that and their fire is infectious enough to encourage others that the power is within them, too.How would you improve the moral of the society? Don't know. Society is going to do whatever they're going to do.
All in all, my "speed-typing" would be:
ESI, Type 4, Sx/Sp or Sp/Sx.
Leaning more towards Sexual instinct first, because the Sexual 4 is known to be one of the most aggressive Enneagram types:And then there is also the fantasizing about love:I hate to admit that I'm a violent person, but yeah... I sort of am. Should probably work on that maybe.I fantasize a lot. About love, about being free, about being unique in some way.
I never got to watch the video
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
IxFJ, probably ISFJ. Dont understand xSE typings at all.
I have, but she didnt seem LSE to me. I wasnt able to tell her type from the video, other than Te/Fi and that she's probably rational. ESE is very wrong, so idk how people type her that. For some reason I cant get a whole picture of what shes like, but what would make most sense imo is ESI e6.