Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
From personal experience I use To...which as Diana said is shuffling information to make things conform or fit a system, idea, or though readily and I like the way To types categories information too. I may borrow from the way they analyze or structure things. But as you can see from what I'm writing here I'm still doing Fi. I'm still giving you my personal account of my experience. Still though I don't use analysis of things around my dual who doesn't emphasize my analysis and finds it a waste of time and non conducive to productivity and or isn't information adding to what he wants to know or is interested in knowing. Still it brings thought to his sometimes impatient and impulsive need to act. I just analyzed again as the ending it switches off but unlike Ti base it's not my primary and typical attitude
Yes, that's quite obvious Fi usage in your posts (I have actually read your posts on other threads as well; you seem an awesome person). If you read my posts, you will see I have huge categories / models in my mind And, although I give examples from my experience as well, I think that's more due to Se, but I end up preferring theory over actual things So you don't normally use Ti, but you don't find Ti annoying anymore? If that's what happens when you spend time with your role function users (i.e., in your case you regularly talk with Ti users on the forums), then I would find Si less annoying if I surround myself with SEI

Btw, when I read "To" (most likely a typo) in your post, I thought you were referring to something between Ti and Te, like a middle ground, which is called "To" Was that my Ni in work or Ne?