Quote Originally Posted by seriousguy View Post
I've read somewhere (I can't remember the source) that (in practice) we tend to over-utilize our 2D functions, when actually we should focus on 3D (along with 4D). It actually makes quite sense to me, as I personally use Ti a lot, and don't use Fe much, due to unfavorable environment. Most of my interests belong to Ti domain (Philosophy, Maths, Programming, Debating, etc.). Does the overuse of HA makes you unhealthy? If it does, wouldn't developing Si makes you unhealthy as well as it's in the 2D position?
From personal experience I use To...which as Diana said is shuffling information to make things conform or fit a system, idea, or though readily and I like the way To types categories information too. I may borrow from the way they analyze or structure things. But as you can see from what I'm writing here I'm still doing Fi. I'm still giving you my personal account of my experience. Still though I don't use analysis of things around my dual who doesn't emphasize my analysis and finds it a waste of time and non conducive to productivity and or isn't information adding to what he wants to know or is interested in knowing. Still it brings thought to his sometimes impatient and impulsive need to act. I just analyzed again as the ending it switches off but unlike Ti base it's not my primary and typical attitude