Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 81 to 120 of 149

Thread: Examples of dual couples

  1. #81
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


    William Shatner (ESFP), Leonard Nimoy (INTP)
    friends

  2. #82
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    7,019
    Mentioned
    422 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I am kind of married to this idea for now.

    I did put a lot of effort into it because she reminds me of a friend who is not transgender. Then I just got into some of her videos. Turned others off immediately. They are a bit long for me and she rambles sometimes.
    I also say IEE. And yes, IEEs can be rambunctious, but only when they feel comfortable with the people they are with. At the very very least, IEEs like to be playful and silly with the right people. The "IEE silly switch" was a thing around here years ago.

    Off-topic: @Eliza Thomason the respectful thing to do is to refer to people with gender pronouns that match their self-identification. It's disrespectful and hurtful to refer to Kat as he/she or male/female mix. She is a woman.

    It's also not an "in" thing, it's a pretty real personal struggle and the suicide among transgender teens are very troublesome. The only reason you see it more in the media now is because activists have carved out spaces for transgender people to find their voices and speak out.


    Its foreign to me because its not where i am right now. I do like to understand, though. Where I am is with Mother Theresa who refused to call a gay person "gay" or "homosexual". She would ONLY call them "Beloved of God". To me, that's right, that's correct, that's the truth. To be seen as who you are in the eyes of God is the ultimate truth. That is how I want to be seen. And the Golden Rule says, treats other how you want to be treated. So, I do not want to be seen as "Eliza, the Heterosexual", which would make me want to say, "No. Please don't talk about my sexuality; that's private, between me, my husband, and God." No, I want to be seen as who I am, beloved of God, and that's how I want to see Kat, and you, and everyone else. Because that, to me, is truth. And I want to follow Mother Teresa's lead on this because I think its right.
    You don't have to label yourself because others don't label you. As a white, heterosexual, cisgender, middle class, educated woman, you are not facing the discrimination and marginalization that a black transgender woman faces. If she is is looked down upon and disrespected because she is different, she has to fight the struggle within and for her community and that involves self-identification ("no, I am not a deluded person with a deviant life-style, I am a transgender woman and this is what that means"). Same for other members of marginalized groups. If you can go through your life not worrying about your identity, it's probably because your identity is considered "normal." Lots of people don't have that privilege.
    “Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
    ― Anais Nin

  3. #83
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    I also say IEE. And yes, IEEs can be rambunctious, but only when they feel comfortable with the people they are with. At the very very least, IEEs like to be playful and silly with the right people. The "IEE silly switch" was a thing around here years ago.
    Well its good that we can all state our opinions. I said mine - I think that "rambunctious" is a good distinction between IEE and IEE's lookalike. Because Look-alikes look alike. But there are distinctions, and this, to me, is one of them.

    But, aside from the differing opinions expressed, I would LOVE to see some Socionics articles or write-ups that allude to IEEs being "rambunctious". So if anyone finds it, please show it.

    Lets add boisterous to rambunctious. Also rowdy, obstreperorus, uproarious. This is just not IEE, in my opinion, not even at a party with close and comfortable friends or colleagues, celebrating out, with plenty of drink. IEE will be laughing and being silly and fully engaged with the best of them but if an observer were to describe each of these partiers over the evening, IEE, among her group of friends, is not going to be given the moniker "rambunctious". Even in this situation, ripe for it. But her Lookalike or her ESE friends - yes, this fun quality would shine here; they would be the life at such a gathering. In fact, in my experience I would say this situation, with close SEE and ESE friends, would bring out the closest thing to rowdy and wild this IEE gets to. Because I would join in and follow their lead, with them, mirroring them, but in a slightly "quieter" way.

    That's my opinion.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    Off-topic: @Eliza Thomason the respectful thing to do is to refer to people with gender pronouns that match their self-identification. It's disrespectful and hurtful to refer to Kat as he/she or male/female mix. She is a woman. .
    Of course, if I were with her in a social situation I would refer to and of her as "she", and "she" only - because this is how she is presenting herself and how she wants to be seen. To do otherwise would just be wrong, and rude. Or if I were Kat's neighbor/acquaintance/colleague I would address/speak of Kat as "she" alone, never he - both to her and to anyone who spoke of her. Furthermore if anyone insisted on calling Kat "him" to me, because of Kat's transgender issue, I would make my boundary as to what i think is right, and say "I understand your point but I will speak of Kat as "she", as that is how Kat prefers to present herself". Also I would not engage in discussion with anyone on the topic of her gender/transgender, because its gossip and not respectful. That's how I would want to be treated, so that's how I would treat Kat.

    That's all I can say on this subject for certain, as I like to think on these things for myself and come to my own conclusions on them as to what I think is right and not right, better, best and worse, etc. I do not want to just swallow whole someone's opinion, or popular consensus of how I should think about a thing and react to a thing. Other issues related to this don't need thought through because I can cross them when I come to them. Because Kat is a person, and simply should be treated as a person with dignity because persons have dignity.

    Here in this forum post, when I just discovered she is he, and was just being presented with videos where Kat describes his birth as a male, his youth as a boy, and his teenhood as a young man, followed by his/her new gender identification and drug-supported change to a female-style body, I do not see any obligation to pretend-away the gender confusion in my thought considering Kat. I am just expressing my own thought as I think it.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    also not an "in" thing, it's a pretty real personal struggle and the suicide among transgender teens are very troublesome. The only reason you see it more in the media now is because activists have carved out spaces for transgender people to find their voices and speak out.
    Its not either/or. Its both/and. Its a personal struggle, AND its an "in" thing. Other personal struggles are NOT "in". For example an engagingly written story about a teen plagued with suicidal thoughts all his life who turned to Jesus and now lives in great joy, having been suddenly and completely cured of suicidal thought - even with glam pics to accompany - thats not going to make the lifestyles page in the daily news no matter HOW MANY hundreds of lives this story will inspire and SAVE. However, an engagingly written transgender story will. That's all.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    You don't have to label yourself because others don't label you. As a white, heterosexual, cisgender, middle class, educated woman, you are not facing the discrimination and marginalization that a black transgender woman faces.
    Add cisgender to something I do not want to be called again, ever. I also don't want to be known as Eliza the heterosexual or Eliza of the ?class or Eliza the educated (unless I am interviewing for a job). Anyway, what makes you think I am white? I haven't posted a pic!

    But Eliza the IEE, here on 16T, that's good. Because it crosses gender, race, culture. We are all one of the types. Just one. And it puts us on pretty equal footing, I do think. We all have about the same number of people who think we are the bees knees, a bore, stiffling, trite, arrogant, annoying, or spectacular and intriguing...Socionics is great!


    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    If she is looked down upon and disrespected because she is different, she has to fight the struggle within and for her community and that involves self-identification ("no, I am not a deluded person with a deviant life-style, I am a transgender woman and this is what that means").
    Yes, good.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    Same for other members of marginalized groups. If you can go through your life not worrying about your identity, it's probably because your identity is considered "normal." Lots of people don't have that privilege.
    Yes. And that's why I said I was not commenting on her gender identity issue because to do so would be silly since I have not struggled with that. But even though cannot identify with Kat's particular struggles, I do identify with struggles because, like Kat and the rest of humanity, I have had struggles. I identify strongly with Kat as a fellow human being that God is close to, and for whom God's love is unfathomable.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  4. #84
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darya View Post
    IEE never rambunctious ?

    [B]The ethical subtype is artistic, impatient and a little extravagant. Unpredictability rules their actions and statements. Like to surprise/entertain friends, in which case even insignificant events can present them with sensations. Frequently the soul of the company, they’re self-assured with a good sense of humor, are easy to get along with and very impulsive. Are able to create familiar (i.e. home) conditions of dialogue, even among unfamiliar people. Willingly pay compliments while admiring (and being admired by) friends. Optimistic and friendly, charming and coquettish, they give the impression of theatricality. When focusing directly on something or someone they rarely blink. Their movements are sharp and resolute, their gait prompt and assured, though a little angular. Love originality and dress tastefully with the purpose of making an impression.
    Thanks for an attempt at a backing up these opinions. However, look at it. There is no rambunctiousness here. "An impression of theatricality" as as close as it gets. And notice how the "impression" word softens "theatricallity". Yes, vivacious and coquettish at turns and extravagant. But notice - extravagent follows artistic and impatient. And even impatient is also not a synonym of rambunctious. None of these are near synonyms for rambunctious.

    Rabbunctious: Boisterous. Rowdy. Obstreperorus. Uproarius. Those are rambunctious synonyms. And these are not like any of the descriptor words above. See? They are sort of alike, but look closely, and you see they really are NOT. The overall description is a very different picture than SEE outgoingness.

    Someone else at the party will be those things, and IEE will light up and enjoy and support. But IEE is not going to lead the fun band.

    IEE: has a closed posture at a party, in spite of her open friendliness. Pretty hard to be rambunctious with a closed posture. Also, Delta is not going to abandon her caution against possibly hurting feelings/offending anyone.

    [I don't know about other types but this is so true for me: "When focusing directly on something or someone they rarely blink."]

    IEE hidden agenda: To Understand. Yes, I really want to understand this and these distinctions and why people would have a wrong guess. In this case I think that there is some confusion over Lookalikes. If one already has it in mind that various IEE-lookalike celebrities or friends are IEE, then I can certainly see why one would say Kat is IEE. But I think Kat is "IEE lookalike".

    Anyway, thanks for trying Darya, and giving us something solid to discuss. I don't think we are going to find any rambunctious IEE descriptions in Soicionics, though.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  5. #85
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Eliza Thomason I am guessing you have never seen a drunk IEE in a group of betas or alphas. Young drunk deltas can get rowdy even among themselves. Each quadra has a type that kind of easily fits in with other quadras. It would be IEE for delta, SEE for gamma and ESE for alpha. I have seen all those types enjoy themselves in a lively beta atmosphere. Not that they seek it out often but when they are there they can get into it. I am surprised you cannot concede to the fact that some IEE can be rowdy, especially the sx/so E7 variety. There are IEE party girls out there and once they had a few they can be the life of the party.

    You approach all this through you christian perspective, which is fine, but not all deltas have your religious values and that is most likely the biggest fact in this discussion. I have been to enough concerts and small show venues to know that deltas aren't all prim and proper.

    This has turned into a game of semantics at this point but Kat is not particularly rambunctious either but you would not know that from a few minutes of video. She is rather subdued in her more serious videos when she is not being light-hearted.

    Also keep in mind the timeframe and culture most of these descriptions were written in. I think it was a pretty oppressive one for women.

    I am aware you self type sx/so but don't recall seeing your enneagram type.


    Social/Sexual


    This Seven has a lot of energy although not always a productive energy, as it often contains a frenetic quality. These Sevens usually have a great sense of humor and many comedians are soc/sexual sevens. The social and sexual instincts go hand in hand with the type Seven fixation. These Sevens want to keep things light. They have fast sharp minds that incorporate social awareness into their humor which they use to get by in their interactions with the world. On the down side, commitment is a big issue for this subtype. They cultivate many friendships and can thrive on winning people over, making them laugh and entertaining them but intimacy can feel threatening and constraining. For others, interacting with this subtype of Seven can feel draining, because they are “on” so much of the time.


    With the self-pres instinct least developed in the stacking, they tend to lose focus on their many plans. On the down side, their health and commitments can fall by the wayside in lieu of the buzz of the newest excitement.


    In intimate relationships, this subtype is “the charmer,” but they maintain their freedom from any strong ties to the one person. They may end up in marriages or long term commitments where they hook up with someone reliable and stable, someone with a much more low key personality. This gives them the stability they don’t have themselves. This eventually leads to trouble if the soc/sexual seven doesn’t realize that responsibility for his or her own life can’t be transferred to another. It’s not that the soc/sexual goes into the relationship with this kind of pattern in mind. It is just easy for the dynamic to default to that dynamic.


    Sexual/Social


    This subtype has a lot of energy, crazy, intense energy and this energy is going to find a way to manifest. This subtype of Seven can have the biggest extremes in behavior and with material success in life. With the self-pres instinct last in the stacking they aren’t afraid of taking risks, so they sometimes become very successful, as in the case of rock stars, but they typically also take too many risks, look for too many easy ways out. With the self-pres least developed, they can become dependent on others to add a much needed stabilizing element to their busy hedonistic lives. They have many of the same issues and share many of the same problems as the other sexual first subtype with regards to relationship addiction and have even more dependency issues then the sexual/self-pres. They can lose focus and drift similar to the social/sexual subtype and their high energy can likewise be draining for others.




    With this subtype, you have drama mixed with mental energy. What separates them from Fours who they might resemble superficially is their planning and future orientation. Their drama and intensity is focused on what they are going to do, not on what has happened. They are usually blind to their past, moving forward and not looking back.
    sp last can make an IEE look SEE I imagine. This happens with @Kim all the time when people type her SEE. Kim is very intuitive which I learned from one on one conversations over a period of time.
    Last edited by Aylen; 04-03-2016 at 10:43 PM.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  6. #86
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Willyum Take4 View Post
    It's possible for a person to correctly self-type themselves, and yet not understand or see the differences between themselves and others of the same type, differences based on non-socionics factors.

    Kat I also see as possibly IEE, although I'm not as familiar with her. In my opinion, Jenna Marbles would be a good Youtuber example of an SEE woman.
    She's adorable! Fun. I like her. SEE a possibility for sure. Also maybe her lookalike?? Naw. The strong impression I got was EIE. And her timing and type of humor and her friendly mocking way reminds me of my good LSE friend who I went to high school with Ij ust mentioned elsewhere. But I don't know. At any rate she has a very familiar way , bringing to mind, so much,various people I know - this likely has to do with, wow, she graduated from my high school Also that was truly my work home in recent years, before I moved here, where I sub-taught. Small world. Also from that school, the writer of short story, "The Lottery", which a lot of people read in school....
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  7. #87
    darya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    TIM
    EIE-Ni 3w4 sx
    Posts
    2,833
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol, @Eliza Thomason, we obviously know some different IEE 's. I know quite a few who have zero problems being the life of the party and can be loud as hell. There's various degrees of intro/extroversion in them, from shy/nervous to crazy ones.

    Question:how do you type Drew Barrymore? Cause she was not exactly subdued when she flashed Letterman on his show, just saying.

    I also type Sarah Silverman IEE, but there's a chance she's ILE. Why the hell would SLI's need a calm, stuck up person, they're already half dead themselves.

  8. #88
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    SHE'S SEE FINAL


    The way she feels about it. She's sensitive to changes in Static condition and look of things. Insecurity about her physical appearance will change her emotions. LISTEN TO HER.

    Why people type without listening is just crazy. LISTEN.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  9. #89
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    @Eliza Thomason I am guessing you have never seen a drunk IEE in a group of betas or alphas. .
    I have. I have been one. Like I say, we mirror the admosphere, but don't lead. Our rowdy has a reserve, like I said above, "Delta is not going to abandon her caution against possibly hurting feelings/offending anyone."

    Also I said, above:

    "IEE hidden agenda: To Understand. Yes, I really want to understand this and these distinctions and why people would have a wrong guess. In this case I think that there is some confusion over Lookalikes. If one already has it in mind that various IEE-lookalike celebrities or friends are IEE, then I can certainly see why one would say Kat is IEE."
    That's what I think. I think you also have some confusion over what is the distinction between these lookalikes. So I am curious what you think the distinctions are. What differences would help you discern the two??

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Young drunk deltas can get rowdy even among themselves. Each quadra has a type that kind of easily fits in with other quadras. It would be IEE for delta, SEE for gamma and ESE for alpha..
    Makes sense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I have seen all those types enjoy themselves in a lively beta atmosphere. Not that they seek it out often but when they are there they can get into it..
    Sure.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I am surprised you cannot concede to the fact that some IEE can be rowdy, especially the sx/so E7 variety. There are IEE party girls out there and once they had a few they can be the life of the party..
    You have to read closer what I wrote. We get rowdy, but its slightly but distinctively different from SEE's rowdy. Its a different kind of party-girl than her lookalike. And "rambunctious" would be a distinction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    You approach all this through you Christian perspective, which is fine, but not all Deltas have your religious values and that is most likely the biggest fact in this discussion. I have been to enough concerts and small show venues to know that deltas aren't all prim and proper..
    No, not at all. You did not read with discernment. This is an wrong assumption you are making here about my approach to this topic. Look: I said:
    "IEE: has a closed posture at a party, in spite of her open friendliness. Pretty hard to be rambunctious with a closed posture. "
    Think on that. I would have to look up the closed-posture thing - not sure where I saw it, and this almost hard to notice at first becaseu IEE is open in spirit at a party. Not her posture though. There is a reserve to her "let-loose and get-wild," if you can call it that. This is not morality or religion-related, its type related.

    "Socionics crosses gender, race, culture" is what I said in an above post. Though I thought this was obvious, I will now specifically add: religion, morality and time period to that statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    This has turned into a game of semantics at this point but Kat is not particularly rambunctious either but you would not know that from a few minutes of video. She is rather subdued in her more serious videos when she is not being light-hearted..
    No. Its not semantics. Words have meaning. And one way to tell the difference between two lookalikes is to discern the meanings of the words in the Socionics descriptions.

    And of course SEEs can be serious! They have every mood. The do not approach life like its a big party, just because they can party, and well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Also keep in mind the timeframe and culture most of these descriptions were written in. I think it was a pretty oppressive one for women.
    "
    I don't agree that the time frame descriptions makes them any less true, or changes their essential meaning.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  10. #90
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    I have. I have been one. Like I say, we mirror the admosphere, but don't lead. Our rowdy has a reserve, like I said above, "Delta is not going to abandon her caution against possibly hurting feelings/offending anyone."

    Also I said, above:

    "IEE hidden agenda: To Understand. Yes, I really want to understand this and these distinctions and why people would have a wrong guess. In this case I think that there is some confusion over Lookalikes. If one already has it in mind that various IEE-lookalike celebrities or friends are IEE, then I can certainly see why one would say Kat is IEE."
    That's what I think. I think you also have some confusion over what is the distinction between these lookalikes. So I am curious what you think the distinctions are. What differences would help you discern the two??


    Makes sense.

    Sure.


    You have to read closer what I wrote. We get rowdy, but its slightly but distinctively different from SEE's rowdy. Its a different kind of party-girl than her lookalike. And "rambunctious" would be a distinction.



    No, not at all. You did not read with discernment. This is an wrong assumption you are making here about my approach to this topic. Look: I said:
    "IEE: has a closed posture at a party, in spite of her open friendliness. Pretty hard to be rambunctious with a closed posture. "
    Think on that. I would have to look up the closed-posture thing - not sure where I saw it, and this almost hard to notice at first becaseu IEE is open in spirit at a party. Not her posture though. There is a reserve to her "let-loose and get-wild," if you can call it that. This is not morality or religion-related, its type related.

    "Socionics crosses gender, race, culture" is what I said in an above post. Though I thought this was obvious, I will now specifically add: religion, morality and time period to that statement.

    No. Its not semantics. Words have meaning. And one way to tell the difference between two lookalikes is to discern the meanings of the words in the Socionics descriptions.

    And of course SEEs can be serious! They have every mood. The do not approach life like its a big party, just because they can party, and well.

    "
    I don't agree that the time frame descriptions makes them any less true, or changes their essential meaning.
    Kat is SEE. If people would listen they can tell. I have to get some IEE videos to post here. Too bad you're not available
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  11. #91
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Here Kate Moss the "child woman quality" Infantile women enough said

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu7-0_7ajJ4
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  12. #92
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darya View Post
    Lol, @Eliza Thomason, we obviously know some different IEE 's. I know quite a few who have zero problems being the life of the party and can be loud as hell. There's various degrees of intro/extroversion in them, from shy/nervous to crazy ones.

    Question:how do you type Drew Barrymore? Cause she was not exactly subdued when she flashed Letterman on his show, just saying.

    I also type Sarah Silverman IEE, but there's a chance she's ILE. Why the hell would SLI's need a calm, stuck up person, they're already half dead themselves.
    No. Read your own posted description above! Is that a calm, stuck up person? No!

    There is a widespread lack of acknowledging the actual meaning of words here. If you aren't going to see that, then you will mix up lookalikes. It doesn't take any special talent. You just have to read the words slowly and acknowledged their actual meanings.

    SLI does fine with SEE, but drama, which SEE brings more of, makes SLI tired. Requests for his actions are easy for him but the requests for his emotions - which SEE provokes more than IEE does - wear him out and stress him....

    I got this. Probably because I am an IEE, the psychologist, and so I just get this, as the Psychologist does. Consider that this might be the truth of it!

    Deltas have a sort of calmer blandness, which compared to Betas can seem a bit half dead.

    [cant look up Sarah S. now, but I assume she has a bit of that half-dead, boring calm to her? Just a shadow of it? And a tiny bit moralizing? Definitely serious? At least - earnest? That'd be Delta...even though, hmm, those things don't help the comedy. She plays the straight person, maybe? Okay, that's an important role.]
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  13. #93
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    I have. I have been one. Like I say, we mirror the admosphere, but don't lead. Our rowdy has a reserve, like I said above, "Delta is not going to abandon her caution against possibly hurting feelings/offending anyone."

    Also I said, above:

    "IEE hidden agenda: To Understand. Yes, I really want to understand this and these distinctions and why people would have a wrong guess. In this case I think that there is some confusion over Lookalikes. If one already has it in mind that various IEE-lookalike celebrities or friends are IEE, then I can certainly see why one would say Kat is IEE."
    That's what I think. I think you also have some confusion over what is the distinction between these lookalikes. So I am curious what you think the distinctions are. What differences would help you discern the two??


    Makes sense.

    Sure.


    You have to read closer what I wrote. We get rowdy, but its slightly but distinctively different from SEE's rowdy. Its a different kind of party-girl than her lookalike. And "rambunctious" would be a distinction.



    No, not at all. You did not read with discernment. This is an wrong assumption you are making here about my approach to this topic. Look: I said:
    "IEE: has a closed posture at a party, in spite of her open friendliness. Pretty hard to be rambunctious with a closed posture. "
    Think on that. I would have to look up the closed-posture thing - not sure where I saw it, and this almost hard to notice at first becaseu IEE is open in spirit at a party. Not her posture though. There is a reserve to her "let-loose and get-wild," if you can call it that. This is not morality or religion-related, its type related.

    "Socionics crosses gender, race, culture" is what I said in an above post. Though I thought this was obvious, I will now specifically add: religion, morality and time period to that statement.

    No. Its not semantics. Words have meaning. And one way to tell the difference between two lookalikes is to discern the meanings of the words in the Socionics descriptions.

    And of course SEEs can be serious! They have every mood. The do not approach life like its a big party, just because they can party, and well.

    "
    I don't agree that the time frame descriptions makes them any less true, or changes their essential meaning.
    Wait, you were a party girl???

    I brought up religion because you went on a tangent after I mentioned she was raised by christian parents. I probably shouldn't have mentioned it. I know SEE that don't party. I would like to see what you mean by posture though. There is a lot on body language and it is influenced by psychological factors that would not be socionics related.

    Can you tell me why culture and timeframe does not effect type descriptions? From what I can tell the descriptions were NOT based on say 1970s American values. Was partying something women did regularly there? I would have to look more into prevalent beliefs in the Soviet Union at the time but I am sure they were oppressive.

    This isn't even about Kat anymore for me. I don't care if she is martian. I have said many times the descriptions are sexist and outdated. That is my opinion but I see it changing in American socionics descriptions. If I read the original Russian translations first I probably would have ran and missed out on all this.

    My assumption is that you put your faith first therefore everything is seen through that lens. Maybe I am wrong and you consider yourself IEE first and christian second. I don't want to misunderstand you.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  14. #94
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    No. Read your own posted description above! Is that a calm, stuck up person? No!

    There is a widespread lack of acknowledging the actual meaning of words here. If you aren't going to see that, then you will mix up lookalikes. It doesn't take any special talent. You just have to read the words slowly and acknowledged their actual meanings.

    SLI does fine with SEE, but drama, which SEE brings more of, makes SLI tired. Requests for his actions are easy for him but the requests for his emotions - which SEE provokes more than IEE does - wear him out and stress him....

    I got this. Probably because I am an IEE, the psychologist, and so I just get this, as the Psychologist does. Consider that this might be the truth of it!

    Deltas have a sort of calmer blandness, which compared to Betas can seem a bit half dead.

    [cant look up Sarah S. now, but I assume she has a bit of that half-dead, boring calm to her? Just a shadow of it? And a tiny bit moralizing? Definitely serious? At least - earnest? That'd be Delta...even though, hmm, those things don't help the comedy. She plays the straight person, maybe? Okay, that's an important role.]
    posture part is right on the money. usually arms/shoulders rounding in
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  15. #95
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    .... She's sensitive to changes in Static condition and look of things. Insecurity about her physical appearance will change her emotions. LISTEN TO HER.
    YES. Exactly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    .Why people type without listening is just crazy. LISTEN.
    Yup.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  16. #96
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Watch Kate Moss at 3:00 minutes into my post. That shy embarrassed witholding like confusion about being a sex symbol that speaks of an infantile woman. I love her. I love all IEE. I love them
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  17. #97
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Watch Kate Moss at 3:00 minutes into my post. That shy embarrassed withholding like confusion about being a sex symbol that speaks of an infantile woman. I love her. I love all IEE. I love them
    I watched it. Wow she is beautiful. As to her type, maybe, but I don't have a strong idea of her type. I would say maybe to the IEE (though its not my first thought, but, as to positive type-ID nothing strong and sure comes to me).

    But as the negatives come to me quicker, I can say for SURE not Kate Moss is not SEE, and of course I could list other types she definitely is not...

    But anyway, the way I like to type someone is to experience them naturally over time, not trying to analyze them, and sometimes early-on, and other times late-in to "knowing" them or experiencing their person, things will occur to me. This can also just be reading how they write and what they say on 16T. In fact I habitually always accept a person's self-type her on 16t, then I "experience" them as I read what they write and "the person that is" becomes so clear and so specific and unique that it shines through their writing, and then certain clear ideas come to me. And if that person is opposed to what they have self-typed, since I notice "nots" first, whatever their type - that often jumps out. (Like, "This person cannot be "x" type because "x" type does not__".)

    Back to Moss. While not being ready to type her (if I ever am), I say yes, she has that child-woman thing that also an IEE has - whether Moss' is the IEE brand of childlike or not, I can pin it. If I analyse my way of being childlike, I don't know, it gets too personal. I would have to think about how to explain it.. Hmm, see, my IEE way is to search for personal examples, and when I do all I get from me is a shocked: "I can't tell[I] that!"[/I] etc. It feels like I am telling my secrets! I dont' explain my way, I just "be" my way, and its nice.

    Okay, lets go to "nots". I am comfortable with nots. I woudl say yes a childlike way is Moss' essence and no, she is definitely a SEE as she lacks sultry-sexy, she is not earthy, direct. Childlike way is coquettish and I cannot see describing a SEE that way. Yes, like "kittenish" vs. "here-I-am, come and get it". Yes, I can relate to Moss' "Me? Sexy? How embarrassing to talk about this. I wonder what exactly you mean. I am just - me!" Whereas a SEE is comfortable with her own sexuality, "Yes, I'm sexy" not "Who, me? Now I am embarrassed." Childlike hides passion - its there, waiting for you to uncover then its like a new surprise to her.(when I fell for my husband I could not make the passion go away and I wrote him blaming him, "You did this to me on purpose!" I suppose like a child, not responsible for her own passion). Its intriguing because she is feeling it, and wants to hide it, and the guy sees it, wants to uncover it, hmm, how long can she pretend, "I don't' know what you are talking about"... Sorry for the specific male/female but I can only speak from my own experience. Its a flirting game but all very subtle that an IEE might do, while hidden passions seethe, while a SEE more likely would just get it all out on the table. I think IEE can revel long in the romance heat while a SEE would get down to business....

    Yikes. This is either going to make no sense at all, or too much sense and I am going to want to come back and edit it out.

    But in the area of romantic attitudes, childlikes are going to be subtle and evasive, and like a child sensitive and very reactionary to subtle touch. While aggressive are confidently surely forward. And assertive. I can't exzplain that so much since I am not that. Really, if I could describe it as I sense it, it would be a good "tell" for the differences between SEE/IEE Lookalikes. Romantic approach between these two look-alikes just does NOT look alike at all!

    So I am struggling to explain this, but yes, Maritsa, you are right, that shy withholding confusion about sex would characterize IEE, and NOT the SEE. Now there you go, that's a tell. Good word choice, Maritsa. And Moss probably is a childlike in romance, and certainly not an aggressor. I am not really seeing victim, but, that could be it, too..

    So how do you think a victim-type would be about that same question? (Or would it be asked of one?) Maybe a more confident attitude, exuding, "Yes, I know I am sexy, I just can't help it?" "Or, "Yes, I'm sexy - catch me if you can"? Tell me what you think the outward attitude difference is.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  18. #98
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Wait, you were a party girl???
    I was just trying to find myself.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I brought up religion because you went on a tangent after I mentioned she was raised by Christian parents.
    Actually I ignored that completely because she all she did was mention it, not explain it. It clearly wasn't an important point in her story. An IEE would have run with that one, explaining how her parents beliefs affected her, how she agreed/disagreed and what seems true or right to her, explaining how her beliefs changed and what they are and where they are evolving now. But that's not how a SEE would write and that's not how Kat writes/talks. I mean, where is the "Lately I have been realizing..." Nope. Not IEE.


    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I probably shouldn't have mentioned it. I know SEE that don't party.
    Maybe thats a SEE lookalike.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I would like to see what you mean by posture though. There is a lot on body language and it is influenced by psychological factors that would not be socionics related.
    Discussed here on the forum once; somehow related to a Reinin. I have to find it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Can you tell me why culture and timeframe does not effect type descriptions? From what I can tell the descriptions were NOT based on say 1970s American values. Was partying something women did regularly there? I would have to look more into prevalent beliefs in the Soviet Union at the time but I am sure they were oppressive.
    Well, for example, some of the IEE examples/stories that are written of are either shocking or embarassing like how the IEE wife ignores her poor husband when he comes home, to a house milling with casual guests, including her latest she is sleeping with. I don't know, maybe they did that more in the 70s being more unaware of the STDs? But this is a culture without the influence of Christian values - not my experience. So different time, different culture, influencing the behavior yet I can relate to the IEEness of the polyamourous wife.

    I think the same author wrote of a husband-stealing SEE. Now, my dh's SEE daughter is not going to steal someone's husband. She was raised better than that. But given the right upbringing, yeah, and for the reasons that author wrote.

    More on polyamorurs IEE wife - maybe she is sx first, and I relate. But she doesn't have what I have. I know God is real, because I know Jesus, who is known to those who want it. Because I know Him, I love Him, and I want to what He wants, and I trust Him. He MADE us. He knows what He designed us for and what is good and what is not - no matter how it might seem to me - and believe me, I am like anyone else in that I think what God asks sometimes is TOO MUCH. But His yoke is easy and His burden is light because He helps us with everything He asks of us. Which can seem too much, yes, because our ways are not God's ways. God's ways are best. See how that changes it? This is a way of believing that is completely outside type.

    Recently Dh and I made new couple friends. What a nice surprise,. Like a present. They are keepers. Husband is a LSE. I recognize my brother in him immediately. Only, this LSE REALLY practices his faith, a true, deep, admirable, longtime faith. Yet while being so much like my LSE brother! His presence, his posture, his busyness - so many things! My LSE brother, while he does not put down the Christian influence on his roots, he does not practice it; he is worldy. Its really neat to see the difference - to see what it looks like for a LSE to walk in faith.

    Christianity and religious faith or beliefs is a thing outside of type. Also so is culture, race, gender, and even psychological disorders (its interesting to compare my disordered ex with other healthy ESEs I know. So different, but the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    This isn't even about Kat anymore for me. I don't care if she is martian. I have said many times the descriptions are sexist and outdated. That is my opinion but I see it changing in American socionics descriptions. If I read the original Russian translations first I probably would have ran and missed out on all this.
    I don't think sexism changes it. Its a bit more work if you are a type more intensely feminine and you are a man, and visa versa. But you can rewrite articles changing "he" to "she". I have done that with some Duality articles, when I want to share them, since both types are written as "he" I change the "she" one to "she" and "her". Its just a bit more work filtering out what is sexist, what is cultural - the core is still there.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    My assumption is that you put your faith first therefore everything is seen through that lens. Maybe I am wrong and you consider yourself IEE first and Christian second. I don't want to misunderstand you.
    Well, I hope I explained it above. The LSE example might help. I don't "first, second" it. Its just two parts of who I am. I have in-common with Christians, and in-common with IEEs. I think that's why that spiritual -styles article appealed to me, because there are so many different Catholic spiritualities (ways of practicing your spirtuality), and yes, they suit different kinds of people. Hmm, what would you be, Aylen? Maybe Benedictine - spiritual battles. If I have characterized that correctly. Yes, you need a Benedictine Cross, Aylen. Keeps you safe. Here: st-benedict-medal1.jpg
    (I would be more than happy to send you a blessed one, if you want).

    Interesting that Benedict created order for the monastic orders, still practiced/lived to the letter the world over these 15 centuries - and I see you, like me, tending to be more the "sail needing a rudder". Benedict had a sturdy rudder. And he sailed - so high.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  19. #99
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    I watched it. Wow she is beautiful. As to her type, maybe, but I don't have a strong idea of her type. I would say maybe to the IEE (though its not my first thought, but, as to positive type-ID nothing strong and sure comes to me).

    But as the negatives come to me quicker, I can say for SURE not Kate Moss is not SEE, and of course I could list other types she definitely is not...

    But anyway, the way I like to type someone is to experience them naturally over time, not trying to analyze them, and sometimes early-on, and other times late-in to "knowing" them or experiencing their person, things will occur to me. This can also just be reading how they write and what they say on 16T. In fact I habitually always accept a person's self-type her on 16t, then I "experience" them as I read what they write and "the person that is" becomes so clear and so specific and unique that it shines through their writing, and then certain clear ideas come to me. And if that person is opposed to what they have self-typed, since I notice "nots" first, whatever their type - that often jumps out. (Like, "This person cannot be "x" type because "x" type does not__".)

    Back to Moss. While not being ready to type her (if I ever am), I say yes, she has that child-woman thing that also an IEE has - whether Moss' is the IEE brand of childlike or not, I can pin it. If I analyse my way of being childlike, I don't know, it gets too personal. I would have to think about how to explain it.. Hmm, see, my IEE way is to search for personal examples, and when I do all I get from me is a shocked: "I can't tell[I] that!"[/I] etc. It feels like I am telling my secrets! I dont' explain my way, I just "be" my way, and its nice.

    Okay, lets go to "nots". I am comfortable with nots. I woudl say yes a childlike way is Moss' essence and no, she is definitely a SEE as she lacks sultry-sexy, she is not earthy, direct. Childlike way is coquettish and I cannot see describing a SEE that way. Yes, like "kittenish" vs. "here-I-am, come and get it". Yes, I can relate to Moss' "Me? Sexy? How embarrassing to talk about this. I wonder what exactly you mean. I am just - me!" Whereas a SEE is comfortable with her own sexuality, "Yes, I'm sexy" not "Who, me? Now I am embarrassed." Childlike hides passion - its there, waiting for you to uncover then its like a new surprise to her.(when I fell for my husband I could not make the passion go away and I wrote him blaming him, "You did this to me on purpose!" I suppose like a child, not responsible for her own passion). Its intriguing because she is feeling it, and wants to hide it, and the guy sees it, wants to uncover it, hmm, how long can she pretend, "I don't' know what you are talking about"... Sorry for the specific male/female but I can only speak from my own experience. Its a flirting game but all very subtle that an IEE might do, while hidden passions seethe, while a SEE more likely would just get it all out on the table. I think IEE can revel long in the romance heat while a SEE would get down to business....

    Yikes. This is either going to make no sense at all, or too much sense and I am going to want to come back and edit it out.

    But in the area of romantic attitudes, childlikes are going to be subtle and evasive, and like a child sensitive and very reactionary to subtle touch. While aggressive are confidently surely forward. And assertive. I can't exzplain that so much since I am not that. Really, if I could describe it as I sense it, it would be a good "tell" for the differences between SEE/IEE Lookalikes. Romantic approach between these two look-alikes just does NOT look alike at all!

    So I am struggling to explain this, but yes, Maritsa, you are right, that shy withholding confusion about sex would characterize IEE, and NOT the SEE. Now there you go, that's a tell. Good word choice, Maritsa. And Moss probably is a childlike in romance, and certainly not an aggressor. I am not really seeing victim, but, that could be it, too..

    So how do you think a victim-type would be about that same question? (Or would it be asked of one?) Maybe a more confident attitude, exuding, "Yes, I know I am sexy, I just can't help it?" "Or, "Yes, I'm sexy - catch me if you can"? Tell me what you think the outward attitude difference is.
    lol you are a negativist
    this is how the above went went

    maybe
    watch more... she's not this or that or that
    What is left is IEE
    Oh wow she could be IEE lol

    I'll have to find a victim type with similar type of topic
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  20. #100
    darya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    TIM
    EIE-Ni 3w4 sx
    Posts
    2,833
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    No. Read your own posted description above! Is that a calm, stuck up person? No!

    There is a widespread lack of acknowledging the actual meaning of words here. If you aren't going to see that, then you will mix up lookalikes. It doesn't take any special talent. You just have to read the words slowly and acknowledged their actual meanings.

    SLI does fine with SEE, but drama, which SEE brings more of, makes SLI tired. Requests for his actions are easy for him but the requests for his emotions - which SEE provokes more than IEE does - wear him out and stress him....

    I got this. Probably because I am an IEE, the psychologist, and so I just get this, as the Psychologist does. Consider that this might be the truth of it!

    Deltas have a sort of calmer blandness, which compared to Betas can seem a bit half dead.

    [cant look up Sarah S. now, but I assume she has a bit of that half-dead, boring calm to her? Just a shadow of it? And a tiny bit moralizing? Definitely serious? At least - earnest? That'd be Delta...even though, hmm, those things don't help the comedy. She plays the straight person, maybe? Okay, that's an important role.]
    LOOK...I'm not positive this Kat person is IEE, that was my guess. It's not about her, it's you typing your identicals based on your personal behaviour, which is wrong. There are thousands of different IEE's. You obviously hang out in very religious circles which skews your perception. Don't patronize me and tell me I will mix look-a-likes, I can tell Ne from Se when I see it in people I know well, tyvm.

    Btw, you haven't answered my question...how do you type Drew????



    These descriptions are MBTI, but I think they're pretty accurate for a big portion of IEE's and SEE's- it obviously can't be completely off, can it? And stop hanging on to semantics, I'm not a walking English vocabulary

    enfp.PNG

    esfp.PNG

  21. #101
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Example of a dual family. lol I am not sure about him and his wife but watch him with his daughter. It is adorable.


    The whole thing is cute but at 3:00 the interaction kills me.



    and it is so funny how he gets his wife laughing even though she seems so controlled emotionally. They seem perfect for each other.
    Last edited by Aylen; 04-04-2016 at 07:24 PM.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  22. #102
    Serious Left-Static Negativist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    3,671
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @darya, I don't mean to be patronizing to you over semantics etc.- I did not realize I was coming across that way but I see it now and I'm sorry. Your post sparked some real insight but I don't have time to write it - busy week. I will get back to this topic later.
    "A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
    ........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........


    "Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
    by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
    attitude acceptable to today's standards."
    - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"

    .
    .
    .


  23. #103
    darya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    TIM
    EIE-Ni 3w4 sx
    Posts
    2,833
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    @darya, I don't mean to be patronizing to you over semantics etc.- I did not realize I was coming across that way but I see it now and I'm sorry. Your post sparked some real insight but I don't have time to write it - busy week. I will get back to this topic later.
    S'all good. I've a depressingly unbusy week so I yap a bit much

  24. #104
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kate Moss - INTP

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I am not sure about him and his wife
    Jonathan Joly - ESFJ

  25. #105
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post

    Jonathan Joly - ESFJ
    We agree on something!

    That was my first impression within seconds of turning on the first video. He is a more hyped up version of my youngest sister (ESE). She is not so over the top but I swear every time I visit her we end going out and she makes me karaoke (after a lot of convincing and literally pulling me by the arm as I protest.) then when we get back to her house she will keep me up past sunrise singing to her home karaoke. It is fun to do once a year which is about how much I see her. She does it all the time.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  26. #106
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    @darya Drew is ESI
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  27. #107
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Since Kate Moss's temperament is obvious from the interview as fidgets a lot while seated she's Ep temperament hence IEE and FINAL
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  28. #108
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    Ethics, yes, and depending on where in Model A is those ethics express them differently. Here, below, is how SEE expresses their strong confident Fi:

    SEE magnificently manipulates people by their moods and desires. He loves to be the center of attention,to fascinate others with his ideas. He easily provokes quarrels but just as easily reconciles them, as if playing; pulling the strings. It is important for him to preserve the good opinion of other towards him, not to let himself fall, to stress his talent and exclusiveness. He’s a great actor and can manifest outstanding diplomatic inclinations, well cultured...

    ...The SEE – men with bright and intense emotional range – from angry indignation to noisy enthusiasm. He thus always finds himself included in the emotional situation, he is ready to act: to help, to sympathize, to fight, to condemn, - and no matter how he expresses his relation to that occurring he is always absolutely confident in the correctness of his sentence.


    "SEE magnificently manipulates people by their moods and desires" - yes, I sense this in Kat, and it makes me desire to draw back. Manipulation - I have a radar for that. Comes from experience. I need reason stay in the presence of the SEE doing this, and basically I have to like them. I have SEEs in my life who demonstrate this characteristic and because I like them its okay; I just enjoy them being them - the person I like.
    The full section of the -section of the IEE Filatova profile is as follows:
    All possibilities must be made aware to others so that they may act on them. IEE easily makes contact with others and rapidly becomes the soul of the company. Is able to connect with spectators and students, and is ready to play with their attention. Her behavior is noticeably impulsive, her mood frequently varies, but she tries to hide all of her negative experiences from others to avoid their judgments.

    IEE possesses the gift of inspiring those that surround her towards activities, which can be considered promising and revealing in the long-term. She finds it rather interesting to manipulate – literally to juggle with the moods of others. Here she is an experimenter, curiously observing the reactions of others to her emotional provocations. She wonderfully manages the emotional sphere, she gives compliments to others and is sincere for she is always ready to notice the positive traits inherent in others, but she may sometimes chaff, and attempt to tease a little… this is never done with actual spite but in a playful manner, as if it’s a game.

    Benevolence and optimism are generally inherent in people of this psycho-type. They are eager to offer aid, but one ought not to rely too heavily on their promises for they are often forgetful, and easily distracted by other people.

    By wonderfully understanding the moods of people IEE knows how to deftly avoid conflict, to extinguish such with a joke. But when the reason for conflict aligns with her inherent interests she may get caught up in the conflict, in such situations she acts actively and decisively.
    That is very similar in many respects to the SEE- section you quoted. The IEE is also describing as manipulating and toying with people...as though it was a game! They also have a great range of mood, and places great importance on remaining diplomatic while being inclined to act in disputes when their own principles are at stake.

  29. #109
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason View Post
    Its foreign to me because its not where i am right now. I do like to understand, though. Where I am is with Mother Theresa who refused to call a gay person "gay" or "homosexual". She would ONLY call them "Beloved of God". To me, that's right, that's correct, that's the truth. To be seen as who you are in the eyes of God is the ultimate truth. That is how I want to be seen. And the Golden Rule says, treats other how you want to be treated. So, I do not want to be seen as "Eliza, the Heterosexual", which would make me want to say, "No. Please don't talk about my sexuality; that's private, between me, my husband, and God." No, I want to be seen as who I am, beloved of God, and that's how I want to see Kat, and you, and everyone else. Because that, to me, is truth. And I want to follow Mother Teresa's lead on this because I think its right.
    If you are truly following Teresa of Calcutta's advice, does this mean you do not publicly express yourself as female, IEE, Christian etc., as well as your views on politics and other matters?

    I would prefer it if you did not mention that "horrible [wo]man". She is... "someone we all want to forget. So why remind us?"

  30. #110
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


    Andrey Pyzh (ENTJ), Tatyana Kulikova (ISFJ)
    Last edited by Sol; 05-19-2016 at 04:25 PM.

  31. #111
    both sides, now wacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canada
    TIM
    9w8
    Posts
    3,512
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post

    Andrey Pyzh (ENTJ), Tatyana Kulikova (ISFJ)
    Hey look everybody, Sol found a dual couple.

  32. #112
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sol only types Russians correctly
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  33. #113
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wacey View Post
    Hey look everybody, Sol found a dual couple.
    Technically they are not a couple, but only sit near and talk. Though, there is a potential for relations. Besides types, that girl has similar interests and should be physically in the taste of the guy (taking into account the look of his previous woman).

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Sol only types Russians correctly
    The magic is: as you understand those examples less, you more trust to external opinion and less use your fascinating typing skills.

  34. #114
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Technically they are not a couple, but only sit near and talk. Though, there is a potential for relations. Besides types, that girl has similar interests and should be physically in the taste of the guy (taking into account the look of his previous woman).



    The magic is: as you understand those examples less, you more trust to external opinion and less use your fascinating typing skills.
    Great method your lovely sol-ship
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  35. #115
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Great method your lovely sol-ship
    It was not about the method, but explanation of the situation rising your conformism. Objectively there is no difference, as I care not much about what public people say, but analyse their "fine" nonverbal behavior.

  36. #116
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    It was not about the method, but explanation of the situation rising your conformism. Objectively there is no difference, as I care not much about what public people say, but analyse their "fine" nonverbal behavior.
    Very good. He seems like an extraverted P type I would assume SEE (Andre). This is an LIE


    The guy on the Left, the one on the right is SEE


    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 05-25-2016 at 10:22 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  37. #117
    both sides, now wacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canada
    TIM
    9w8
    Posts
    3,512
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Technically they are not a couple, but only sit near and talk. Though, there is a potential for relations. Besides types, that girl has similar interests and should be physically in the taste of the guy (taking into account the look of his previous woman).



    The magic is: as you understand those examples less, you more trust to external opinion and less use your fascinating typing skills.
    Right she was the one from the other video? He is dating up which is nice to see. The other chick had a trailer trash thing going on.

  38. #118
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wacey View Post
    Right she was the one from the other video?
    That was my 1st post of her.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Very good. He seems like an extraverted P type I would assume SEE (Andre).
    If to think one correct your dichotomy is very good.

    Mike Wolfe - N type, and Frank Fritz not ENTJ for sure

  39. #119
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    probably. have some doubts about Middleton still

    William (ENTP), Kate Middleton (ISFP)

  40. #120
    &papu silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,077
    Mentioned
    456 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Catrific and Joey are probably SLI-Si + IEE-Ne dualz


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •