I'm obviously a
I'm obviously a
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Pa3s, yes you are LOL.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
constructivist, emotivists are the bane of my existence.
Are there specific ways in which a constructivist benefits from having an emotivist as a dual, and vice-versa? Since in theory one is wants communication to be straightforward, while the other wants to maintain a positive mood?
[constructivist chimes in]
In duality this is quite apparent IMO:
If the constructivist is also a negativists critique ensues towards positivist emotivist.
If the constructivist is also a positivist, the constructivist tries to offer alternative viewpoints/data/solution to cater negativist emotivist.
Everyone breaks those boundaries and tries become opposite. At least for me this is not natural way of being.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 07-14-2017 at 09:07 AM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
This L I T E R A L L Y dispels all the ESE-bad memes because they're Constructies, btw. How can you be coercively conformist if you give absolutely zero fucks about beating the emotional atmosphere into submission?
I seem to be constructivist. I basically listen to the same songs and/or parts of songs for hours. I'll usually come back and do this again a few weeks/months later when the song becomes interesting to me again. I also tend to listen to songs more when I have emotional issues on my mind, like a bad breakup.
When I was younger, I once watched this one movie 5 times in a row. My friend asked me to watch something else, and I didn't want to.
I have both emotivist and constructivist traits, too hard for me to decide which one I am, because for me they're about equal.
Reinin dichotomies aren't that good IMO, and they're modified by subtype.
I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by ClownsandEntropy
